The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using mouse macrophage nucleofector kit

1

Transfection of siRNAs for PU.1 and IRF Transcription Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small interfering RNAs for mouse PU.1 (Spi1-MSS247676), human PU.1 (Spi1-HSS186060), mouse IRF4 (MSS205501), and mouse IRF8 (MSS236848) and control siRNA (Stealth RNAi Negative Universal Control Lo GC, Med GC, and Hi GC (#12935–200, 300, and 400)) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). BMMCs of 2 × 106 (or 2 × 105) were transfected with 10 (or 1) μl of 20 μmol/L siRNA with a Neon 100 μl kit (or a Neon 10 μl kit) using a Neon transfection system (Invitrogen) set at Program #5. Introduction of siRNA into LAD2 cells and BMDCs was performed as previously described15 (link),24 (link). Briefly, a Neon transfection system was used for LAD2 cells15 (link), and a Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector kit and Nucleofector II (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) were used for BMDCs25 (link),26 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Activation of STAT6-Firefly Luciferase in BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were electroporated using mouse macrophage nucleofector kit (Lonza, Hopkinton, MA) and the Amaxa machine with STAT6-Firefly luciferase (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, plasmid #35554) along with Renilla–Luciferase plasmid as a transfection control. BMDMs were stimulated with or without 10 ng/ml IL-4 4 hr post electroporation for another 24 hr. Cell lysates were collected and analyzed using the Promega Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Macrophage Transfection and Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were transfected with empty vector control (pcDNA3.1-(empty)-TAG, Addgene 138209), constitutively active STAT3 (Stat3-C Flag pRc/CMV, Addgene 8722), or constitutively active IKK-2 (IKK-2 S177E S181E, Addgene 11105) using a mouse macrophage transfection system, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Lonza, VPA-1009; Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector Kit). Briefly, 1 × 106 cells were combined with 3 μg plasmid DNA individually, or 2.5 μg each together combined in a total volume of 100μL Nucleofector solution and transfected with the Nucleofector 2b Device (Lonza, AAB-1001) per macrophage-specified setting Y-001. Cells were then plated on a sterile 12-well plate and incubated for 12 hours at 37°C in 1 mL of fully supplemented RPMI 1640 and then polarized with LPS and IFN-γ for an additional 12 hours at 37°C. Conditioned media and BMDM lysate RNA were then harvested for ELISA and quantitative RT-PCR, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rab2a Depletion and Retroviral Transduction in Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rab2a depletion in BMMs was carried out using a Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector kit (Lonza) and Amaxa Nucleofector with On-Targetplus SMARTpool siRNAs (Dharmacon) directed against mouse and human Rab2a (L-040851-01-0005 and L-010533-00-0005) or small interfering nontargeting (siNT; J-001810) siRNA, as described previously (22 (link)). Knockdown efficiency was evaluated via densitometry in Western blotting using Bio-Rad ImageLab version 4.1 software on a Chemi-Doc gel imaging system (Bio-Rad), normalizing Rab2a expression to that of β-actin for each sample.
Retroviral supernatants were generated in HEK 293T cells transfected for 48 h h with pCLXSN derivatives and the ecotropic helper plasmid pCL-Eco (Retromax, Imgenex), as described previously (22 (link)). Retroviral supernatants were added to BMMs (2:5 [vol/vol] ratio) for 48 to 60 h prior to paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixation and 24 to 36 h prior to infection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytokine Profiling of Transfected BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were transiently transfected by electroporation using Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector Kit (Lonza). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, complete medium was replaced with 0.5% FBS containing medium. Twenty-four hours later, supernatants were collected, spun down, and subjected to ELISA cytokine analysis for TNF-α and IL-1β (R&D Systems). RNA was collected for RT-qPCR analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spred2 knockdown in MLE-12 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 1.0 × 106 MLE-12 cells were transfected with 2 µg of a mixture of Spred2-specific, or non-targeting control siRNAs (Thermo Scientific, Yokohama, Japan), using mouse macrophage nucleofector kit (Lonza, Cologne, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and plated in a 24-well plate (7 (link)). Cells were used at 24 hours post transfection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transfection and Genetic Manipulation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T, MC38, and MEF cells were transfected with plasmids using LIPO3000 (catalog L3000015; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. BMDMs were transfected with plasmids or siRNA using the Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector Kit (Lonza) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HEK293T cells were transfected with siRNA using INTERFERin (Polyplus) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mouse SHP2 or SIRPα knockdown (SHP2 KD MEFs and SIRPα KD BMDMs) was performed by lentiviral expression shRNA. The gRNA was used to generate SENP8-KO HEK293T cells. gRNA sequences were cloned into the LentiCRISPR, version 2, according to a standard protocol. gRNA/Cas9 expression plasmids were transfected, and then cells were selected with puromycin (2 μg/ml); the resulting single colonies were picked and expanded. Related sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generating CRISPR Knockdown Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LentiGuide plasmids with the correct gRNA insertion were used as templates to amplify hU6 promoter-gRNA fragments in a 50 µl × 8 PCR reaction system using NEB Phusion polymerase. The following primers were used: forward: 5′-ACC​CAG​AGA​GGG​CCT​ATT​TC-3′; reverse: 5′-CTG​TCC​CTG​TAA​TAA​ACC​CG-3′. The gRNA sequences used are negative control: 5′-GAA​CTC​GTT​AGG​CCG​TGA​AG-3′ (Sanjana et al., 2014 (link)); Atg16l1-a: 5′-ACC​GAA​CTG​CAC​AAG​AAG​CG-3′; and Atg16l1-b: 5′-GGG​TCT​GGT​TGG​CTA​CCT​CG-3′. If the intensity and purity of the PCR products were good, then the rest of the amplified DNA was purified using a Qiagen PCR purification kit and eluted with 200 µl double distilled H2O. 20 µl of 3 M NaAc (pH 5.2) followed by 500 µl ethanol was added to precipitate DNA at −80°C for at least 1 h. After centrifugation at 18,506 g at 4°C for 20 min, the DNA pellet was washed twice with 70% ethanol and allowed to air dry. DNA was then solubilized using 12 µl sterile double distilled H2O, and the concentration was checked using Nanodrop. The Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector Kit (Lonza) was used to electroporate 3 µg DNA into 2 × 107 freshly isolated bone marrow cells from Cas9-het mice on an Amaxa Nucleofector II machine following the manufacturer’s instructions. Electroporated cells were differentiated in 20% LCM-containing DMEM as above and harvested on day 7 for use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Macrophage Differentiation and Genetic Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 5 days of differentiation, BMMs were collected and 1 × 106 cells electroporated with 2–3 μM ON‐TARGETplus SMARTpool siRNAs (GE Dharmacon) directed against either mouse Arf6 (L‐043217‐01‐0005), mouse Rab8a (L‐040860‐01‐0005), mouse Rab6a/a′ (L‐040858‐01‐0005), mouse Stx6 (L‐059391‐01‐0005), or a non‐targeting (siNT; D‐001810‐10‐20) siRNA, in an AmaxaTM Nucleofector II using the Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector® Kit (Lonza). BMMs were immediately diluted in pre‐warmed medium, plated either onto coverslips in a 24‐well plate, or in a 6‐well plate, and incubated for 72 h prior to infection. Protein depletions were evaluated by Western blotting and densitometric analysis using β‐actin levels for normalization. Retroviral transductions of BMMs were performed using derivatives of pCLXSN and the ecotropic helper plasmid pCL‐Eco (Retromax, Imgenex). Retroviral supernatants were generated as follows: HEK 293T cells were seeded in 10 cm tissue culture dishes at 2.5 × 106 in 20 ml medium and transfected after 24 h with a mix of 800 µl DMEM, 8 µg pCL‐Eco, 8 µg pCLXSN derivative, and 48 µl FuGENE® 6 (Roche) following the manufacturer's protocol and incubated for 48 h prior to collection. Retroviral supernatants filtered through a 0.45 μm filter were added to BMMs (2:5 ratio v/v), and retroviral transduction proceeded for 24 h before BMM infections was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Silencing NR1D1 and NR1D2 in BMMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All siRNAs were purchased from Invitrogen (now Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Specific siRNAs against NR1D1 (stealthTM RNAi; Nr1d1MSS211361 [3_RNAI]) or NR1D2 (stealthTM RNAi: Nr1d2MSS221355 [3_RNAI]) were used.
Transfection of wild-type BMMCs were performed with Mouse Macrophage Nucleofector Kit (VPA-1009; Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). BMMCs were suspended in Nucleofector Solution to a final concentration of 2 × 106 cells/100μL. The cells were transfected with 500 nM negative control or 250 nM specific siRNA of NR1D1 and NR1D2, respectively, using the Nucleofector II (Amaxa Biosystems, now Lonza) program Y-001. Subsequently, the transferred cells were placed in a 20% FBS medium and cultured in a 24-well plate. After 24 h, the transfected BMMCs were stimulated with anti-mouse IgE antibody (1μg/mL), IL-33 (1 ng/mL), or LPS (1 μg/mL) in the absence or presence of 10 μM SR9009.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!