The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1200ex electron microscope

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan, United States, United Kingdom

The JEOL 1200EX is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of materials at the nanoscale. It provides a maximum accelerating voltage of 120 kV and features a range of capabilities for advanced microscopy applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

114 protocols using 1200ex electron microscope

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of ALV-J Interaction with TPPPS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DF-1 cell monolayers were infected with 104.75 TCID50 of ALV-J with or without TPPPS (50 μg/mL). The monolayers were scraped at 4 h post-infection and then successively fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide at 4 °C. The samples were dehydrated in a graded acetone series prior to infiltration and embedding. Ultrathin (50 nm, LKB-V) longitudinal sections were prepared after the location in semi-thin section, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and then examined under a JEOL-1200EX electron microscope (JEOL, Japan).
The ALV-J solution was concentrated through sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The isovolumetric virus solution (0.55 mg/mL) and TPPPS (50 μg/mL) were mixed and then incubated for 1 h. The mixture was subsequently placed on carbon-coated grids and then negatively stained with 0.01 mL of 2% phosphotungstic acid for 1 min. After washing and drying, the samples were examined under a JEOL-1200EX electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing MDCK-PR8 Virus Interaction with APS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MDCK cell monolayers were infected with PR8 virus suspension (MOI = 1) containing APS (40 μg/mL). The monolayers were scraped at 4 h post-infection and successively fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide at 4°C. The cell samples were dehydrated in a graded acetone series prior to infiltration and embedding. Ultrathin (50 nm, LKB-V) longitudinal sections were prepared after the samples were located in the semithin section, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined under a JEOL-1200EX electron microscope (JEOL, Japan). The infected cells without APS treatment serve as the control. Additionally, the PR8 virus suspension was concentrated through sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The isovolumetric virus suspension (0.55 mg/mL) and APS (40 μg/mL) were mixed and incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The mixture was subsequently placed on carbon-coated grids and negatively stained with 0.01 mL of 2% phosphotungstic acid for 1 min. The samples were washed, dried, and examined under a JEOL-1200EX electron microscope. The isovolumetric mixture containing the virus and the STE buffer solution was used as the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of HUVECs by SEM and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to compare the ultrastructures of HUVECs from the control and treatment groups. After 48 h, cells were prepared for imaging and analyzed under a JSM-6330F scanning electron microscope.
For TEM, HUVECs were cultured and treated as described for the ATO treatment and miR-126 mimic transfection experiments. Following a 48-h incubation in complete medium, monolayers were washed three times in PBS and detached from the plastic surface with trypsin. The cell slurry was then immediately centrifuged for 4 min at 15,000 x g. The cell pellet were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and 0.1 M sucrose (pH 7.4) overnight, then washed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and postfixed in osmium tetraoxide (1.0%), stained en bloc with uranyl acetate (0.25%), dehydrated in graded ethanol solutions, and embedded in Epon. Thin sections were stained with lead citrate and then examed using 1200EX electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan)
For SEM, HUVECs were incubated on glass coverslips in 6-well plates and grown for 48 h. Then, the cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and prepared for observation with a scanning electron microscope (JSM-6330F; JEOL) [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Recombinant α-Synuclein Fibrils Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant human and mouse wild-type α-synuclein and fibrils were prepared as described previously [33 , 57 (link)]. Briefly, purified α-synuclein (7 – 10 mg/ml) was incubated at 37 °C in a shaking incubator at 200 rpm in 30 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, containing 0.1% NaN3, for 72 h. α-Synuclein fibrils were pelleted by spinning the assembly mixtures at 113,000 xg for 20 min, resuspended in 30 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.5), and sonicated for 3 min (Biomic 7040 Ultrasonic Processor, Seiko). The protein concentrations were determined by HPLC. Samples were run on gradient 12% polyacrylamide gels and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB), or electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membranes. For immunoblotting, membranes were incubated with 3% gelatin (Wako) for 10 min at 37 °C, followed by overnight incubation at room temperature with primary antibodies. Next, the membranes were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature with biotinylated anti-rabbit or mouse IgG (Vector Lab), then incubated for 30 min with avidin-horseradish peroxidase (Vector Lab), and the reaction product was visualized by using 0.1% 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and 0.2 mg/ml NiCl2 as the chromogen. For electron microscopy, samples were placed on collodion-coated 300-mesh copper grids, stained with 2% (v/v) phosphotungstate, and examined with a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Basal Complex Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For basal complex development stage analysis, HFF infected cells were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and processed for routine electron microscopy (Ferguson et al., 1999 (link)). Briefly, cells were post-fixed in osmium tetroxide and treated with uranyl acetate prior to dehydration in ethanol, treatment with propylene oxide, and embedding in Spurr’s epoxy resin. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate prior to examination with a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope.
Basal complex mutant infected cells were prepared for ultrastructural observations by fixation in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mM sodium cacodylate (EMS) and processed as described (Coppens and Joiner, 2003 (link)). Ultrathin sections were stained before examination with a Philips CM120 EM (Eindhoven, the Netherlands) under 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extracellular Parasite Fixation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracellular parasites (±Tf-LPA/NGP, see NGP uptake above) were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, after the indicated incubation. Samples were processed for routine electron microscopy as described previously [69 (link)] and examined in a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of LV Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small pieces of tissue from the LV free wall were fixed by sequential immersion in triple aldehyde-DMSO, ferrocyanide-reduced osmium tetroxide, and acidified uranyl acetate; dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol; passed through propylene oxide; and embedded in Poly/Bed resin (Polysciences Inc., 21844-1). Thin sections were sequentially stained with acidified uranyl acetate, followed by a modification of Sato’s triple lead stain, and examined with a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dictyostelium Spore and Cyst Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dictyostelium species were grown in association with Klebsiella aerogenes on 1/5th SM agar for robust species and either LP, 1/3rd LP or non-nutrient agar plates with charcoal for delicate or very delicate species, respectively8 (link), and left to develop into fruiting bodies after bacteria were cleared. Mature spores were harvested from 4 day-old fruiting bodies. Cysts were induced by incubating cells, freshly harvested from growth plates, for 3–5 days in darkness submerged in PB or 250 mM sorbitol in PB, depending on the species8 (link). Cysts were harvested when fully encysted, as established by Calcofluor staining of the cellulose wall. Spores and cysts were pelleted and fixed by submersion in 0.83% glutaraldehyde, 0.67% OsO4, 2.5% sucrose in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 7.4 as described previously25 (link). Dehydration, embedding, and sectioning used conventional techniques. Images were captured on Ditabis imaging plates or a SIS Megaview III camera using a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope. For each species, 10 images of complete spore- and cyst sections where collected at magnifications between 10 and 20 K, as well as close-ups of regions of the cell wall at 60 K. Sections were selected that were not obviously oblique, included a fair-sized nucleus and went through spores longitudinally, to ensure that they passed approximately through the centre of the cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transmission Electron Microscopy of HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) of HUVECs was carried out as previously described40 (link) on cellular pellets obtained after centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min. Cell pellets were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 40 min. After three washes with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 30 min. Following three rinses, samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol. Samples were subsequently embedded in Epon 812 resin. Thin sections (65 nm) were cut by using a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, then examined using a JEOL 1200EX electron microscope (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Macrophage Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophage cells were cultured for 3 days in 75-cm2 flasks prior to be incubated for 24 h with native oocysts at ratio 1:1. Then, cells were washed twice with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and gently detached with a cell scrapper. Following centrifugation (400 g, 10 min), cells were resuspended and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The samples were post-fixed in osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in ethanol, treated with propylene oxide and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin. Thin sections were cut and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate prior to examination in a Jeol 1200EX electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!