The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti cd20 apc clone 2h7

1

Immunophenotyping of Leukemia Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 1000 DB, Daudi, or a 1:1 mixture of cells were diluted into 1 mL of artificial cerebrospinal perfusion fluid (aCSF; Harvard Apparatus) which closely matched the fluidic properties (viscosity, salt concentrations) of CSF. Samples were introduced to the device at the flow rate of 2 mL/hr. Following the cell capture, fix/perm buffer was perfused over the cells for 10 min, followed by permSB for 5 min, and PBS containing 2% FBS and 1% BSA for 5 min, all at a flow rate of 1 mL/hr. A cocktail of antibodies containing 1 µL of anti-Ki-67, anti-CD19, and anti-CD20, and 2 µL of anti-κ light chain and anti-λ light chain was perfused over the cells at 1 mL/hr for 5 min. Lastly, to reduce background signal from antibodies binding to the channel surface, washing buffer (PBS with 2% FBS and 1% BSA) was perfused at 1 mL/hr for 5 min. Alternatively, cells were exposed to Ibrutinib-BFL, followed by staining with Hoechst 33342 and anti-CD20-APC (clone 2H7; BioLegend). Images were captured on a Nikon Eclipse TE2000S inverted microscope (Nikon) equipped with four filter sets (#31000v2, #41001, #41002b, #41024; Chroma Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tracking Donor Chimerism Using SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We identified SNPs that distinguished the donor and recipient MCMs using a panel of 12 SNPs (see Additional file 3:Table S2) and the rhAMP SNP Genotyping System (Integrated DNA Technologies) as described previously38 (link),75 (link), giving preference to homozygous/homozygous mismatches. We performed the rhAMP assays in triplicate using a LightCycler 96 Instrument (Roche Molecular Systems) in the endpoint analysis mode.
We quantified donor chimerism in whole PBMCs or immune subsets by sequencing the diagnostic SNPs with an Illumina MiSeq using previously described primer sets, PCR conditions, and analysis pipeline (see also Additional file 4:Table S3 and Additional file 5:Table S4)38 (link). To isolate specific immune subsets, we stained PBMCs with anti-CD3 FITC (clone SP34; BD Pharmingen), anti-CD14 PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone M5E2; BioLegend), anti-CD20 APC (clone 2H7; BioLegend), anti-CD45 PE (clone D058-1283; BD Pharmingen), and Live/Dead Fixable Near-IR vital dye (ThermoFisher Scientific) and sorted into monocyte (singlets, live, lymphocytes, CD45mid, CD14+ cells), T lymphocyte (singlets, live, lymphocytes, CD14, CD45hi, CD3+), or B lymphocyte (singlets, live, lymphocytes, CD14, CD45hi, CD20+) populations using a BD FACSJazz cell sorter. We used between 179 and 61,251 cells for gDNA extraction and sequencing for each sorted population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Profiling of Ramos Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ramos cells were analysed by flow cytometry using the following antibodies: anti-CD20-APC (clone 2H7, Biolegend), anti-CD2-APC (clone REA972, Mitenyi Biotech), anti-CD47 (clone B6.H12, BioXCell), and anti-Calreticulin-DyLight-488 (FMC 75, Enzo Life Sciences), and with Annexin-V FITC (A13199, Thermo Fisher), or with biotinylated Maackia amurensis lectin II (MAL-II) (B-1265, VectorLabs) followed by streptavidin-APC (Thermo Fisher). Sialidase (neuraminidase from Vibrio cholerae, Sigma 11080725001) treatment was performed by incubating cells with 30 nM enzyme in dPBS at a cell concentration of 1 × 106 ml−1 for 1 h at 37 °C. In Extended Data Fig. 6j, single-cell suspensions were prepared from diced tumours and fixed in paraformaldehyde as described previously. Cells were stained with Zombie-NIR viability dye (BioLegend), anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, BioLegend), anti-F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend) and anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend) and analysed using an Acea Novocyte Quanteon flow cytometer and FlowJo software (version 10.6.1). Live CD45+ cells were counted using gates that separated the CD45 and CD45+ populations, and macrophages were counted using a single gate applied equally to all samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!