The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 mm tungsten bead

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States

3 mm tungsten beads are a laboratory equipment product used for mechanical disruption and homogenization of samples. They are made of tungsten, a hard and dense metal, with a diameter of 3 millimeters. The beads are designed for use in high-speed bead mills or other sample preparation techniques that require physical agitation to break down and mix materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using 3 mm tungsten bead

1

Tick DNA Isolation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ticks were washed in 70% ethanol followed by 2 × 5 min in sterile water. We added 75 μl of incubation buffer (D920), 75 μl of lysis buffer (MC501) and 3 mm tungsten beads (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and homogenized the ticks in a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was subsequently isolated using the Maxwell 16 LEV Blood DNA kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions with a few modifications (samples were incubated at 56 °C overnight).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tick Sample Preparation and Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to testing, ticks were washed with 70% ethanol and then rinsed with Schneider's Drosophila Medium (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) containing 200 IU/ml penicillin, 200 μg/ml streptomycin and 0.5 μg/ml amphotericin B. Ticks were then cut into small pieces and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for 5 min before the samples were mixed with 500 μl of Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) The samples were then lysed using a Qiagen Tissue Lyser with 3 mm Tungsten beads at 25 Hz for 2 × 30 s. A further 500 μl of DMEM was added to the samples, followed by centrifugation at 600 × g for 5 min at room temperature and then supernatant was collected. One half of the supernatant was used for PCR; DNA was extracted using a previously-described DNA extraction method (Tuppurainen et al., 2011 ) followed by conventional PCR (Tuppurainen et al., 2011 ) or the real-time PCR (Bowden et al., 2008; Stubbs et al., 2012 ) as described below for testing the cell culture samples. In the real-time PCR, cycle threshold (Ct) values over 39 were considered negative. The other half of the supernatant of each sample was used for virus isolation (Lubinga et al., 2014c (link)). Tick samples collected from Egypt in 2006 did not contain sufficient material for virus isolation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Nosema Spores in Bee Midguts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We quantified the number of Nosema spores in the midgut of bees using three randomly selected workers per treatment and colony that had survived until the end of the experiment. To do this we, dissected their midguts into a single Eppendorf tube containing 1 mL of deionized water and a single 3 mm tungsten bead (Qiagen, USA). We homogenized the sample using a mixer mill (Retsch MM301) at 25 Hz for 30 s, layered 500 µl of the homogenate onto 1.5 ml of 100% Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 2 mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged the sample for 90 min at 20,000 × g and 4 °C. We discarded the supernatant and resuspended the pellet in 1 mL double distilled water for 10 minutes at 28,000 × g and 4 °C. This process was repeated 4 times before we resuspended the final pellet in 50 µl DDI water. We used a 10 μl subsample to quantify spores’ numbers using a Neubauer chamber and a Leica light microscope at 400× magnification. Total spore number per sample was calculated by multiplying spores counts by 50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of Nosema apis Spores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To collect N. apis spores, we sampled 20 foraging workers from five different N. apis infected honey bee colonies housed at the University of Western Australia and froze all the 100 bees we sampled for 2hrs at -20 °C. We dissected out their midguts, pooled them in an Eppendorf tube containing 1 mL of DDI water and a 3 mm tungsten bead (Qiagen, Australia), and homogenized them in a mixer mill (Retsch MM301, Australia) for 30 s at 25 Hz. Next, we layered 0.5 mL of the homogenate onto 1.5 mL of 100% Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich, Australia) in a 2 mL Eppendorf tube, and centrifuged it at 18,000 x g for 60 min at 4 °C, discarding the supernatant. The pellet containing the N. apis spores was resuspended using 1.5 mL DDI water. The sample was briefly vortexed and centrifuged again at 20,700 x g for 5 min. We repeated this procedure three times before resuspending the final pellet in 0.5 mL of DDI water to store at -80 °C. Prior to infecting drones, we thawed the sample and diluted it with sugar syrup to a final concentration of 10,000 spores/μL. Our previous work showed that collecting N. apis spores as described above minimizes the effect on their viability25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!