The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lcquan software

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

LCquan software is a data analysis tool designed for use with liquid chromatography (LC) systems. The software's core function is to provide efficient and accurate quantification of analytes in complex samples, enabling researchers to obtain reliable results from their LC-based experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using lcquan software

1

UHPLC Analysis of Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical composition was determined using Ultra High Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) modified as previously described [31 (link),43 ]. UHPLC analysis was performed using a Thermo Scientific UHPLC UltiMate 3000 (Waltham, MA, USA) with a Hypersil GOLD™ a Q column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.9 µm, Thermo Scientific™) and results were analyzed with Thermo Scientific™ LCQUAN™ software. Crude extracts of Al and Gg and standard solutions (oxyresveratrol, resveratrol, gallic acid and glabridin) were dissolved in methanol at concentrations of 1 and 10 mg/mL. Samples were filtered (0.20 mm, Millipore) and 1 μL was directly injected. Solvents for HPLC analysis were formic acid (0.1% v/v) in water as solvent A and formic acid (0.1% v/v) in methanol as solvent B, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. These experiments used the following gradient: 30% B linear (0–4 min), 30–50% B linear (4–5 min), 50–70% B linear (5–8 min), 70–100% B linear (8–12 min), 100% B (12–15 min), and 30% B linear (15–18 min). An equilibrium period of 5 min was performed prior to the injection of subsequent samples. Chromatograms were recorded at 280 nm (glabridin and gallic acid), 305 nm (resveratrol), and 326 nm (oxyresveratrol), using the photodiode detector. Quantitative determination of compounds was performed using peak area with an external standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolomic Analysis of PDT-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SK-ChA-1 cells were seeded in 6-wells plates and cultured until confluence. Cells were treated using the PDT protocol as described in “PDT protocol” (n = 3 per group). After 90 min, the cells were washed with 1 mL cold PBS and the cells were lysed in 1 mL lysis buffer (40% acetonitrile, 40% methanol, 20% water). The cells were scraped and transferred to 2-mL centrifuge tubes that were shaken for 10 min at 4 °C. Next, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 20,000×g (4 °C), after which the supernatant was aspirated and stored at −80 °C. LC-MS analysis was performed on an Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 autosampler and pump (Thermo Scientific). The MS operated in polarity-switching mode with spray voltages of 4.5  and −3.5  kV. Metabolites were separated using a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column [2.1 × 150 mm, 5 µm, guard column 2.1 × 20 mm, 5 µm (Merck)] using a linear gradient of acetonitrile and eluent A (20 mM (NH4)2CO3, 0.1% NH4OH in ULC/MS grade water [Biosolve, Valkenswaard, the Netherlands)]. The flow rate was set to 150 µL/min. Metabolites were identified and quantified using LCquan software (Thermo Scientific) on the basis of exact mass within 5 ppm and further validated in accordance with the retention times of standards. Peak intensities were normalized based on total ion count.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Bile Acids by HPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bile acids were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with mass spectrometry (MS). Calibration standards were prepared for individual deuterated bile acids at concentrations of 0.005–40 μM. Samples were prepared as previously described.[50 (link)] HPLC–MS was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 HPLC system coupled with a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Breda, the Netherlands) and an Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands) at 40°C. The ratio of mobile phase A (1 mM ammonium formate in water [pH 4.4]) to mobile phase B (acetonitrile:water [95:5 v/v] containing 1 mM ammonium formate) was varied over 14 minutes, with a flow rate of 600 μL/minute. The injection volume was 3 μL and the autosampler temperature was 20°C. The mass spectrometer, equipped with a heated electrospray ionization source, was operated in negative mode and full-scan spectra were recorded. The spray voltage was 3 kV, and capillary and probe heater temperatures were 350°C and 320°C, respectively. Nitrogen was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas, set at 60 and 20 (arbitrary units), respectively. The resolution was 100,000 at m/z 200. The data were analyzed using LCQUAN software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Orotate in Hippocampus of AD Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For determining orotate concentration in the hippocampus of WT and APP/PS1 mice, mice were anesthetized by 1.5% isoflurane and hippocampi were dissected and then homogenized by Bullet Blender homogenizer (Next Advance) at 4°C with methanol: acetonitrile: water (5:3:2 ratio) solution at 40 mg/ml concentration. Homogenized samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C at 16,000 x g. The supernatants were transferred to glass HPLC vials and stored at −80°C. Metabolic profiling was done using an Ultimate3000 UHPLC system (Dionex, Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Metabolite separation was done using a 49 min gradient of buffer A (95% acetonitrile) and buffer B (50 mM ammonium carbonate, pH 10, 5% acetonitrile) using SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC column (Merck; 150 3 2.1 mm, 5 mm) coupled to a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC guard column (Merck; 20 3 2.1 mm, 5 mm) with flow rate of 0.1 ml/min. Data were acquired by switching between negative and positive polarity modes using full MS scans. Identification of orotate was done using LCquan software (Thermo Scientific) based on external standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CiPTEC cells were washed with ice cold PBS, and metabolites were extracted in 1 ml lysis buffer containing methanol/acetonitrile/dH2O (2:2:1). Samples were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4°C, and supernatants were collected for LC‐MS analysis.
LC‐MS analysis was performed on an Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 autosampler and pump (Thermo Scientific). The MS operated in polarity‐switching mode with spray voltages of 4.5 kV and −3.5 kV. Metabolites were separated using a Sequant ZIC‐pHILIC column (2.1 × 150 mm, 5 μm, guard column 2.1 × 20 mm, 5 μm; Merck) with elution buffers acetonitrile (A) and eluent B (20 mM (NH4)2CO3, 0.1% NH4OH in ULC/MS grade water (Biosolve)). Gradient ran from 20% eluent B to 60% eluent B in 20 min, followed by a wash step at 80% and equilibration at 20%, with a flow rate of 150 μl/min. Analysis was performed using LCquan software (Thermo Scientific). Metabolites were identified and quantified on the basis of exact mass within 5 ppm and further validated by concordance with retention times of standards. Peak intensities were normalized based on total peak intensities, and data were analysed using MetaboAnalyst (Chong et al, 2019).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed with lysis buffer composed of methanol/acetonitrile/H2O (2:2:1). The lysates were collected and centrifuged at 16,000g (4 °C) for 15 min and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube for liquid–chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis. For media samples, 10 µl of medium was mixed with 1 ml lysis buffer and processed as above.
LC–MS analysis was performed on an Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 autosampler and pump (Thermo Scientific). Metabolites were separated using a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column (2.1 × 150 mm, 5 µm, guard column 2.1 × 20 mm, 5 µm; Merck) using a linear gradient of acetonitrile (A) and eluent B (20 mM (NH4)2CO3, 0.1% NH4OH in ULC/MS grade water (Biosolve), with a flow rate of 150 µl min−1. The mass spectrometer was operated in polarity-switching mode with spray voltages of 4.5 kV and −3.5 kV. Metabolites were identified on the basis of exact mass within 5 ppm and further validated by concordance with retention times of standards. Quantification was based on peak area using LCquan software (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Milk Triacylglycerol Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted lipids
from the three brands of milk were separated by a Luna Omega C18 column
(150 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 μm, Phenomenex) on the same Vanquish
UHPLC system. The column compartment was maintained at 55 °C
and the sample tray at 15 °C. The mobile phase is composed of
water/acetonitrile (40:60, v/v) containing 10 mM ammonium formate
(A) and acetonitrile/isopropanol (10:90, v/v) containing 10 mM ammonium
formate (B). The gradient elution was performed by a linear increase
of mobile phase B from 5 to 100% over 25 min with a flowrate of 0.25
mL/min. The injection volume was 5 μL.
The detection of
milk TAG was also by Q Exactive Plus MS operated in full scan (120–1800 m/z) positive ion mode using the same instrument
settings as for TAG identification. The raw data acquired were imported
into Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for TAG group identification
based on accurate mass of parent ions as well as MS2 information.
Quantification of TAG groups was performed with LCquan software (Thermo
Fisher Scientific) as well as external calibration curves of TAG standards.
Finally, TAG concentrations were converted into μmoles, and
the mean values of the three brands of milk samples are presented.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Metabolomic Analysis by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC–MS analysis was performed as described in [30 (link), 49 (link)]. Metabolites were extracted from supernatant media before and after treatment and by lysing cells in ice-cold methanol/acetonitrile/H2O (50:30:20). Samples were shaken at 4 °C for 10 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 16,000 g, and the supernatant was collected and analyzed by LC–MS. Analytes were separated using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC column (2.1 3 150 mm, 5 mm) (Merck) and detected with high-resolution, accurate-mass mass spectrometry using an Orbitrap Exactive in line with an Accela autosampler and an Accela 600 pump (Thermo Scientific). The elution buffers were acetonitrile for buffer A and 20 mM (NH4)2CO3 and 0.1% NH4OH in H2O for buffer B. A linear gradient was programmed starting from 80% buffer A and ending at 20% buffer A after 20 min, followed by wash (20% buffer A) and re-equilibration (80% buffer A) steps with a flow rate of 100 ml/min. The mass spectrometer was fitted with an electrospray-ionization probe and operated in full-scan and polar-switching mode with the positive voltage at 4.5 kV and negative voltage at 3.5 kV. Metabolite identification and data analysis were carried out using LCQUAN software (Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Metabolite Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peak areas (= measured intensity) of different metabolites were determined using LCquan software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) where metabolites were identified by the exact mass of the singly charged ion and by known retention time on the HPLC column. Commercial standards of all metabolites detected had been analyzed previously on the same LC-MS system. The 13C labeling patterns were determined by measuring peak areas for the accurate mass of each isotopolog of many metabolites. The measure intensities of the intracellular metabolites were normalized to the amount of unlabeled intracellular arginine and phenylalanine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Tofacitinib

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on a TSQ Vantage triple quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled with an Accela UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). Chromatographic separation was performed using a Thermo Scientific™ Hypersil GOLD™ HPLC column with a particle size 1.9 μm, 100 mm length and 2.1 mm diameter maintained at 25 °C. 10 μl of sample was injected onto the column. The mobile phase consisted of ACN with 0.1% formic acid as the organic component (B) and water with 0.1% formic acid as the aqueous phase (A). The system was maintained in 8% buffer B at a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1. Samples were maintained at 4 °C prior to analysis.
Tofacitinib and tofacitinib-d3 were detected using heated electrospray ionisation in positive ion mode using the following selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions: 313.0 > 173.06 for tofacitinib and 316.3 > 176.1 for tofacitinib-d3. The mass spectrometer settings were optimised as follows: spray voltage 5000 V, capillary temperature 369 °C, vaporiser temperature 353 °C and collision energy 29 eV. Argon was used as collision gas. Quantitation was calculated using the peak-area ratio of the analyte to internal standard using LCQuan software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!