The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lasercheck

Manufactured by Coherent Inc
Sourced in United States

LaserCheck is a precision laser power and energy meter designed for accurate measurement of continuous wave (CW) and pulsed laser power or energy. It features a large, high-resolution digital display and supports a variety of laser wavelengths. LaserCheck provides reliable performance for laser characterization and monitoring applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using lasercheck

1

Multimodal Stimulation of Cochlear Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were generated via a custom-made system based on NI-DAQ-Cards (NI PCI-6229; National Instruments; Austin, USA) controlled with custom-written MATLAB scripts (The MathWorks, Inc.; Natick, USA). Acoustic stimuli (sampling rate = 830 kHz) were presented open-field via a loudspeaker (Avisoft Inc., Germany) localized on the left side at ∼15 cm from the pinna. A 0.25-inch microphone and measurement amplifier (D4039; 2610; Brüel & Kjaer GmbH, Naerum, Denmark) were used to calibrate sound pressure levels. Optical stimuli were delivered at the cochlear round window via an optical fiber (200 μm diameter, 0.39 NA, Thorlabs GmbH, Germany) coupled to a blue laser (473 nm, MLLFN-473-100, 100 mW diode pumped solid state [DPSS]; Changchun New Industry Optoelectronics). The maximum light intensity (or radiant flux) was measured before every experiment (LaserCheck; Coherent Inc.) and later used for calibration. The round window was exposed as previously described [[13] , [14] , [15] (link),72 ]. Briefly, the round window was exposed by opening the temporal bone ventrally from the stylomastoid foramen and the exact location of the round window was determined by visually following the stapedial artery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Photobiomodulation Therapy on HaCaT Keratinocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photobiomodulation therapy was performed with an indium–gallium–aluminum phosphide semiconductor diode laser (DMC, São Carlos, Brazil), with a red wavelength of 660 nm and near-infrared wavelength of 808 nm, an output power of 20 mW, and a beam cross-sectional area (i.e., spot) of 0.028 cm2 (i.e., 0.6 mm in diameter). The power density was 0.71 W/cm2, while the energy density was 5 J/cm2 (7 s, 0.14 J). Prior to the laser's use, power stability was tested using an optical power meter (LaserCheck, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Irradiation on HaCaT lineage keratinocytes was performed by contact in the center of each well of the plate at two different times: after 18 h and 1 h of stimulation with peripheral blood mononuclear cells cytokines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optical Cochlear Potential Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical cochlear
potentials were obtained in response to blue light pulse delivered
by a 200 μm optical fiber coupled to a 473 nm laser (MLL-FN-473-100,
100 mW, diode pumped solid state [DPSS]; Changchun New Industry Optoelectronics).
Irradiance was calibrated with a laser power meter (LaserCheck; Coherent
Inc). The CAP was obtained by averaging the low-pass filtered (cut-off
frequency = 3.5 kHz) mass potential.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photostimulation of Optogenetically Engineered IHCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photostimulation of IHCs was achieved using a blue 473 nm laser (MBL 473, CNI Optoelectronics). Irradiance and duration of the light pulses were controlled using the EPC-9 amplifier via a custom controller unit, allowing the transformation of a particular voltage to a particular laser power (i.e. photostimulation during 5, 10, or 50 ms from 2 to 5 V with different increasing steps). A FITC filter set was used to direct the stimulating blue light to the sample. Radiant flux (mW) was measured before each experiment with a laser power meter (LaserCheck; Coherent Inc or Solo2 Gentec-eo) placed under the 40× objective lens. The diameter of the illumination spot was estimated using a green fluorescent slide and a stage micrometer, and it was used to calculate the irradiance in mW/mm2. Photocurrents were measured in voltage-clamp mode and the photodepolarization in current-clamp mode. Only the first series of evoked photocurrents and photodepolarizations were analyzed in order to rule out potential changes in the photoresponses due to inactivation of ChR2-H134R-EYFP (Lin et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Photobiomodulation therapy optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Photobiomodulation therapy was applied using a continuous-wave indium-gallium-aluminum-phosphide (InGaAlP) diode laser (660 nm; DMC, São Carlos, SP, Brazil) with a spot size of 0.028cm2. The following parameters were used in contact and punctual irradiation mode: 20 mW, 0.71 W/cm2, 3 J/cm2 (4 s) or 5 J/cm2 (7 s), and 0.08 J or 0.14 J, respectively. Irradiations were applied twice (6 and 12 h after seeding) underneath each well (for 96-well plates in the center and for 24-well plates in five equidistant points). The output power was checked with a power meter (LaserCheck, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, US) before and after the irradiations. The control groups were under the same conditions as the irradiated groups, but the laser equipment was kept off. The PBMT parameters were defined as previously described in the literature [5 (link), 7 (link), 14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Laser Phototherapy of Cell Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Laser phototherapy was performed using a continuous wave gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs, 780 nm) diode laser (Twin Flex II, MMOptics, São Carlos, Brazil) with a spot size of 0.04 cm2. The irradiations were performed in contact and punctual mode, with the following parameters: output power of 40 mW, power density of 1 W/cm2, energy of 0.4 J, and energy density of 10 J/cm2. In order to avoid indirect light exposure wells adjacent to the test well were empty. Each well was irradiated once in a central point for 10 s. Laser parameters were chosen based on a previous study [4 (link)]. The output power was checked with a power meter (Lasercheck, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, USA), before and after the irradiations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimized Photobiomodulation Protocol for Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBM was performed by using an indium–gallium–aluminum–phosphide (InGaAlP) customized diode laser, in continuous operation and punctual and contact modes. The dosimetry parameters were as follows: 660 nm, 20 mW, 0.028 cm2 spot area, 0.71 W/cm2, 7 s, 5 J/cm2, 0.14 J total energy per point5 (link). The photoactivation was performed transoperatively and every day up to 7 days (Sup. Fig. S1). Noteworthy, unless wound measurements needed to be done, animals were only manually restrained for the photoactivations. PBM exposure was avoided in the control wound by using a black cardboard paper over it. The output power was checked with a power meter (Lasercheck, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, California, USA) before all photoactivations. A double microporous tape (Nexcare, 3 M, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA) was then applied on the silicon splint as an occlusive patch and replaced every day to minimize wound dehydration in both groups. Each mouse was individually caged to prevent stitches biting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Raman spectra were measured by a Renishaw in Via Raman spectrometer (controlled by WiRE 3.4 software, Renishaw, UK) connected to a Leica microscope (Leica DMLM, Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), equipped with a 785 nm near-IR laser that was focused through a 63 × NA = 0.90 water immersion objective (Leica Microsystems, USA). The laser intensity before and after travelling through the 50× objective was 110 mW and 29.4 mW, respectively (measured with LaserCheck, Coherent Inc., Portland, OR, USA). The standard calibration peak for the spectrometer with silicon mode at a static spectrum was 520.5 ± 0.1 cm-1. Cells cultured with blank media, or media with G-CSF for 10 days and 7 weeks were seeded on MgF2 (United Crystals Co., Port Washington, NY, USA) for 24h prior to Raman spectra collection. The exposure time was 10 s for one accumulation at 100% laser power for all of the cell samples. A total of 50 spectra (randomly 5 spots for 5 spectra per cell) were acquired for each group in the fingerprint region (600 −1800 cm−1) which has been proven effective in evaluation of molecular changes of cancer cells 13 (link), 21 (link)–24 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Raman and IR Spectroscopy of Spinning Quartz Cell

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RR measurements were carried out as previously described.1 (link) Briefly, the 413.1 nm excitation from a Kr ion laser (Spectra-Physics, Mountain View, CA) was focused to an ~30 μm spot on the spinning quartz cell rotating at ~1000 rpm. The scattered light, collected at a right angle to the incident laser beam, was focused on the 100 μm wide entrance slit of a 1.25 m Spex spectrometer equipped with a 1200 grooves/mm grating (Bausch & Lomb, Analytical Systems Division, Rochester, NY), where it was dispersed and then detected by a liquid nitrogen-cooled CCD detector (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, NJ). A holographic notch filter (Kaiser Optical Systems, Ann Arbor, MI) was used to remove the laser line. The Raman shifts were calibrated with indene. The laser power was adjusted by neutral density filters, and the power at the sample point was measured by a handheld laser power meter (LaserCheck, Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA).
The IR spectra were recorded at 4 cm−1 resolution on an FTIR instrument (Magna-IR 560, Nicolet, Madison, MI) with a CaF2 IR cell (200 μm path). For the IR dark–light experiments, the 413.1 nm laser beam was introduced into one end of an optical fiber, and the IR cell surface (~1 cm diameter) was illuminated by the laser beam dispersed from the other end of the optical fiber.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!