The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cell ranger pipeline

Manufactured by 10x Genomics
Sourced in United States

The Cell Ranger pipeline is a software suite developed by 10x Genomics for the analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data. It provides a comprehensive workflow for processing raw sequencing data, performing data normalization, and generating feature-barcode matrices that can be used for further downstream analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

92 protocols using cell ranger pipeline

1

Single-cell analysis of cellular transcriptomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell analysis and cluster identification was performed on 1,654 – 16,903 captured cells per sample using the 10X Chromium single cell system (10X Genomics Inc.) at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Campus Genomics Core Facility and sequenced each sample to a read depth of 95-164K reads/cell, yielding 85-92% sequence saturation. Read mapping and expression quantification were performed using a combination of the 10X Cell Ranger pipeline (10X Genomics Inc.) and custom Seurat analytic scripts (74 (link)). Briefly, single-cell reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCH38) and assigned to genes using the standard Cell Ranger pipeline. Normalized gene expression was then used to produce a UMAP plot that provided cell clusters based on similarity of gene expression. Once cells were assigned to a cluster, custom Seurat scripts were used to statistically derive the gene expression differences within and between cell clusters using t-tests in Seurat. Trajectory analysis was then conducted using Monocle (75 (link)). To be statistically similar across the study, the Monocle trajectories were used to guide specific trajectory specific t-tests within Seurat. From these, pathway analyses were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) on the differential transcriptional profiles seen in the cell clusters and trajectory groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA-seq and ATAC-seq Analysis of Mouse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Base calls were converted to fastq format and demultiplexed using Illumina’s bcl2fastq/2.16.0.10. Demultiplexed reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10) using Tophat v2.0.14 with default settings32 (link). For the RNA-seq data, aligned reads were quantified using Cuffquant v2.2.2, and then a normalized gene expression matrix was generated using Cuffnorm v2.2.228 (link),33 (link)–35 (link). For the ATAC-seq data, PCR duplicates were removed using Samtools v1.936 (link), and data from all alignment files were merged into a single file for peak calling using MACS v2.1.0 (parameters: --nomodel --keep-dup all --extsize 200 --shift -100 -B --SPMR --call-summits) to generate a master list of peaks observed in the experiment37 (link). A peak count matrix was calculated by using Bedtools v2.28.038 (link) to compute the intersection between each sample’s aligned reads and the master list of peaks. Expression matrices for the single cell data were generated using the 10X Cell Ranger pipeline (10X Genomics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-Cell Transcriptomics and Protein Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw 10x CITE-seq data were processed with using Cell Ranger 3.0.0 and was applied default setting of 10x cell ranger pipeline (10x Genomics, USA). Reads were aligned to the human reference sequence GRCh38. After used Cell Ranger multipipeline to analyze FASTQ data derived from Gene Expression data (GEX) that contains the sequence data from the clusters that pass filter on a flow cell and feature barcode (antibody) library from the same GEM Well. The pipeline cellranger aggr was performed for aggregating outputs from several runs of cellranger count or cellranger multiple pipeline. The cellranger aggr pipeline normalizes the individual gene expression and feature barcode (antibody) runs to the same sequencing depth, recomputes the feature-barcode matrices and performs analysis on the concatenated data. After concatenated sequencing data from four lymphoma samples, we used Loupe Browser (https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/downloads/latest%23loupe) to analyze the concatenated cloupe file. In Loupe, populations of interest were identified and subjected to comparative analysis by antibody features within the Loupe software, as outlined in the Results section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Zebrafish Genome Alignment and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw reads were aligned to version 11 of the zebrafish genome (GRCz11) using the standard Cell Ranger pipeline from 10X Genomics (version 3.1.0). Briefly, reads with low-quality barcodes and UMIs were filtered out and then mapped to the reference genome. Reads uniquely mapped to the transcriptome and intersecting an exon at least 50% were considered for UMI counting. Before quantification, the UMI sequences would be corrected for sequencing errors, and valid barcodes were identified on the basis of the EmptyDrops method (85 (link)). Resulting barcodes were used to generate a UMI matrix for further analysis. The scRNA-seq data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SRA database: PRJNA981358.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-Cell Autophagy Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reads were aligned and unique molecular identifier counts were obtained using the CellRanger pipeline (10x Genomics). Subsequent processing, integration, and downstream analysis were performed using R software (version 4.1.1) and Seurat software (version 4.1.0) [11 (link)]. Cells were filtered according to the numbers of genes and reads; genes with differential expression between samples were identified using the FindMarkers function. The autophagy score was calculated using the Seurat function AddModuleScore. Two autophagy databases, Human Autophagy Database (http://www.autophagy.lu/index.html) and HAMdb (http://hamdb.scbdd.com/)[12 (link)], were used for AddModuleScore analysis. For comparison of autophagy pathway activity among individual cells, autophagy pathway data were retrieved from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) [13 (link)], then subjected to assessments using the R package AUCell [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Single-cell Transcriptome Profiling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell capture and pre-amplification were conducted on a GemCode instrument (10× Genomics) according to the manufacturer’s ‘instructions (Chromium™ Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kit v2). The generated library was sequenced using the Illumina X10 platform and the generated sequencing reads were aligned and analyzed using the Cell Ranger Pipeline (10× Genomics). The raw count data of each single cell were deposited into the public database of the Genome Sequence Archive for Human (GSA-Human) under accession number HRA000928. Single-cell analysis was conducted using Seurat9 (link). The potential doublet of single-cell data was detected using DoubleFinder10 (link). A connectivity map was constructed according to a previous ligand-receptor dataset35 (link) using CellPhoneDB16 (link). GO analysis was conducted using http://geneontology.org. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was used to perform deconvolution analysis36 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Zebrafish Single-Cell RNA-Seq Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw reads were demultiplexed and aligned to version 10 of the zebrafish genome (GRCz10) using the Cell Ranger pipeline from 10X Genomics (version 1.3.1 for wild type and version 2.1.1 for fgf3-/- data sets). 1,666 cell barcodes were obtained for wild type embryos, 1932 for fgf3 siblings and 1459 for fgf3 mutants. These quantities were estimated using Cell Ranger’s barcode ranking algorithm, which estimates cell counts by obtaining barcodes that vary within one order of magnitude of the top 1 percent of barcodes by top UMI counts. The resulting barcodes (henceforth referred to as cells) were used to generate a UMI count matrix for downstream analyses. Data deposition: the BAM files and count matrices produced by Cell Ranger have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession no. GSE123241).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-cell RNA-seq with 10x Genomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Libraries prepared with Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits v2 (10x Genomics; Cat. #120237) were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Cell Ranger pipeline (10x Genomics) was used to convert BCL files into FASTQ files, perform STAR alignment,58 (link) filter, count UMIs, and generate gene-barcode matrices. Cell Ranger Aggr pipeline (10x Genomics; v. 3.0.0) was used to aggregate multiple samples, normalize outputs, and recompute gene-barcode matrices on combined data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Single-Cell Analysis of Whole PBMCs and Enriched B Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following BCL conversion, fastq files were processed through CellRanger Pipeline (10X Genomics). This allowed demultiplexing, alignment, filtering, barcode counting, and UMI counting, and generating of cell x barcode matrices. These matrices were then input into SPRING15 , which is a tool for visualizing and analyzing single-cell data16 (link). Using this, we were able to visualize single-cell data obtained from whole PBMCs and enriched B cells. Using the gene-finder tool, cells expressing gene of interested were highlighted and compared across groups. Differential gene expression analysis (DEG) was performed with the R package Seurat17 (link) (v3.0.0) with the FindMarkers function using the default settings. For BCR clonotype analysis, we used the CellRanger Pipeline. As per the definition by 10X Genomics: “Clonotypes are defined as a set of cells with the same CDR3 sequence in their V(D)J variable regions.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Aligning Genomic Sequencing Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reads from the ChIP-seq data and ATAC-seq experiments were aligned to the Drosophila melanogaster genome (dm6) using Bowtie (v 1.1.2)87 (link), allowing a maximum of two mismatches and including only uniquely aligned reads. Coverage files were created by extending the aligned reads to the estimated insert size or the actual size for the paired-end libraries. For the bulk mRNAseq samples, pseudo-alignment was performed using the Kallisto package (0.46.0)88 , to calculate the gene expression values. For the scRNA-seq samples, alignment and separations of reads from different cells and quantification of gene expression were done using the Cell Ranger pipeline (v 2.1.1) from 10× Genomics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!