The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

86 protocols using uh5300

1

Analytical Techniques for Compound Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on
a Rudolph Autopol IV polarimeter (Hackettstown). Ultraviolet (UV)
spectra were obtained using a double beam spectrophotometer (UH5300,
Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Infrared (IR) spectra were
obtained on a Shimadzu Fourier transform infrared spectrometer using
KBr pellets. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra
(HRESIMS) were measured on an Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer
with a HESI ion source (ThermoFisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded with a Bruker
Avance III 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with
tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. Circular dichroism
(CD) spectra were measured with an Applied Photophysics spectrometer
(Chirascan, New Haven). Silica gel (200–300 mesh), Sephadex
LH-20 (GE Healthcare), and reverse phase (RP)-18 gel (20–45
μm, FuJi) were used for column chromatography. Preparative or
semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was
performed on an Agilent 1260 liquid chromatography system equipped
with Zorbax SB-C18 columns (5 μm, 9.4 mm × 150 mm or 21.2
mm × 150 mm). Chiral separation was carried out on a Chiralpak
AD-H chiral column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm, Daicel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Natural Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IR spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu Fourier transform infrared spectrometer using KBr pellets. UV spectra were obtained by using a double beam spectrophotometer UH5300 (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). Optical rotations were measured on a Rudolph Autopol IV polarimeter (Hackettstown, NJ, USA). High resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra (HRESIMS) were recorded on an Agilent 6200 Q-TOF MS system or a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Orbitrap MS system. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were measured with an Applied Photophysics spectrometer (Chirascan, New Haven, CT, USA). NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), Silica gel (200–300 mesh), and RP-18 gel (20–45 μM, FuJi) were used for column chromatography (CC). HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1260 liquid chromatography system equipped with Zorbax SB-C18 columns (5 μM, 9.4 mm × 150 mm, or 21.2 mm × 150 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Antioxidant Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method of Bougatef et al. (14 (link)) with slight modifications was used to measure DPPH⦁ scavenging activity. In a test tube, 2.5 mL of SCSP, SCSP-I, SCSP-II, or SCSP-III sample solution of different concentrations was added, followed by adding 2.5 mL of DPPH solution (0.1 mmol/L) prepared in absolute ethanol. The mixture was shaken for 10 s and then left to react in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. Next, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 517 nm with an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (UH5300, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Japan). The blank control had 2.5 mL of distilled water. The DPPH radical scavenging rate of the sample solution was calculated according to Equation (4):
where A0 represents the absorbance of the DPPH ethanol solution without sample and A represents the absorbance of the DPPH ethanol solution in the measured sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of HA Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The functional groups of HA fractions were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS 5, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, USA) in the wave number range of 4000 to 400 cm−1. The light absorption properties of HA fractions were characterized using UV-vis spectrophotometry (Hitachi UH5300, Ibaraki, Japan). Fluorescence spectra of the HA fractions were obtained using a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Japan). The emission spectrum between 380 and 650 nm with excitation at 360 nm was recorded, and excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectra were obtained by continuous scanning of the emission (Em) wavelength from 220 to 600 nm by increasing the excitation (Ex) wavelength from 200 to 450 nm. TOC was measured using a TOC analyzer (LiquiTOCII, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chlorophyll Quantification in Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shoot tissue was sampled in 1.5 ml tubes and fresh weight was determined. 80% (v/v) of cold acetone solution was added and left overnight at 4 °C in dark. Samples were then centrifuged at 4 °C, 15,000 rpm for 15 minutes, and absorbance of the supernatant solution was measured at 646 nm, 663 nm, and 750 nm with a double-beam spectrophotometer (HITACHI UH5300). The amount of chlorophyll in the aboveground tissue was determined from the concentration of chlorophyll in the solution, which was calculated from the following formula using the measured values.
Chla+bμM=19.54×A646-A750+8.29×A663-A750
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Plant Soluble Sugar and Starch

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction and measurement of soluble sugar and starch content were performed as reported previously [20] . For the measurement of seed soluble sugar, 80–100 mg seeds were collected and added into 25 mL ddH2O, heating at 95 °C for 30 min. 50 μL of supernatant was added to 400 μL 2 mg/ml anthrone sulfuric acid, followed by heating at 95 °C for 5 min. The mix of heated supernatant and anthrone sulfuric acid was measured by spectrophotometer (HITACHI, UH5300) at wavelength of 625 nm. The concentration of soluble sugar was calculated according to the glucose standard curve. Content of soluble sugar (mg/g) = concentration × volume ÷ dry weight (DW).
The residue were dried and ground into powder under liquid nitrogen, which was ground into a homogenate after adding 5 mL 0.2 M KOH. Then the samples were transferred it to a tube heated in 95 °C for 30 min, and added 1 mL 1 M acetic acid, followed by centrifuge at 12000 rpm for 5 min. Finally, 50 μL of supernatant was used to perform the remaining steps as the measurement for soluble sugar. The concentration of hydrolysis product glucose was calculated according to the glucose standard curve. Content of starch (mg/g) = 0.9 × concentration × volume ÷ DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of NCTD Hydrogel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zeta potential was detected by Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS (Zetasizer Nano ZS 90, Malvern Instrument, UK) at 25 °C. The morphological of hydrogel was recorded by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS-SUPRA55, Germany). Rheology tests were performed on the rheometer (MCR 302, Aaton paar, Austria) to investigate mechanical properties and stability of NCTD Gel. In order to explore self-assembly mechanism of NCTD Gel, thermodynamic mechanism was recorded on a NANO ITC (TA, USA). UV–vis spectra were recorded on a UV–vis spectrophotometer (HITACHI UH5300, Japan) with the range of 200–400 nm. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (NicoletiS10, Thermo, USA) with the range of 4000-400 cm−1. CD spectra were obtained by using Chirascan V100 (Applied Photophysics, UK) with the range of 200–400 nm. 1H-NMR (Avance IIIHD 400 MHz spectrometer, Bruker, America) spectra were used to ensure the formation mechanism between GA and NCTD. MD simulation was performed by GROMACS 2019.6 software to reveal the self-assembly mechanism of NCTD Gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimization of Dye Removal Efficiencies by Adsorbents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The affecting factors of dose (5–30 g/L), contact time (3–18 h), temperature (20–50 °C), pH (3–11), and concentration (30–90 mg/L) with the control condition of initial DR28 dye concentration of 50 mg/L, a sample volume of 100 mL, and a shaking speed of 150 rpm by using an incubator shaker (New Brunswick, Innova 42, USA)8 (link),9 (link),20 (link) on DR28 dye removal efficiencies of SBB, SBBT, SBBM, SBBA, and SBBZ were investigated through a series of batch experiments which referred from the previous study of Praipipat et al.18 (link) Their optimum conditions were chosen from the lowest dose or contact time or temperature or pH or concentration with obtaining the highest DR28 dye removal efficiencies9 (link). UV–VIS Spectrophotometer (UH5300, Hitachi, Japan) with a wavelength of 497 nm was used for analyzing dye concentrations, and the triplicate experiments were investigated to verify the results and report the average value. Dye removal efficiency in the percentage and dye adsorption capacity is calculated following Eqs. (1)–(2): Dye removal efficiency%=C0-Ce/C0×100 Dye adsorption capacityqe=(C0-Ce)V/m where Ce is the dye concentration at equilibrium (mg/L), C0 is the initial dye concentration (mg/L), qe is the capacity of dye adsorption on adsorbent material at equilibrium (mg/g), V is the sample volume (L), and m is the amount of adsorbent material (g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Characterization of Green-Synthesized AuNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPR of the green-synthesized AuNPs was evaluated using an UV–Vis spectroscopy (UH-5300, Hitachi, Japan) device in the scanning range 400–800 nm. The AuNPs were also analyzed using a dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zetasizer Nano S90, Malvern) apparatus to determine their size distribution profile and zeta potential values. The participation of biological molecules to the synthesis of AuNPs was analyzed using a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR; FTS 7000, Varian, Australia) spectroscopy in the scanning range 500–4000 nm. The size and shape of the green-synthesized AuNPs were analyzed using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-3010, JEOL, Japan) instrument. Furthermore, the elemental composition of the AuNPs was examined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Biosynthesized Palladium Nanoclusters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biosynthesized PdNCs were characterized by ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy (UH-5300, Hitachi, Japan) in the scanning range of 300–800 nm. The size distribution profile of the PdNCs was analyzed via dynamic light scattering (DLS; Zetasizer Nano S90, Malvern). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (FTS 7000, Varian, Australia) was performed to elucidate the role of biological molecules in the synthesis of nanoclusters. The morphology, size, d-spacing (inter-atomic spacing), and crystalline nature of the PdNCs were characterized via transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-3010, JEOL, Japan). Meanwhile, the elemental composition of the nanoclusters was identified via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The X-ray diffraction patterns were determined with an X-ray Diffractometer (X’Pert PRO, PANanalytical, Netherland) with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5417 Å). The freeze-dried nanoclusters were further analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Zeiss, EVO 18, Germany). The oxidation state of the PdNCs was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Thermo Scientific, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!