The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using sputter coater

1

Phase Analysis of Sintered Ceramics by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase analysis of sintered specimens using X-ray Diffraction (Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray Diffractometer, Malvern, UK) 2.2 kW X-ray source of Cu anode operated at 40 kV Voltage and 40 mA current at 1.6 kW power with a step size of 0.026°) was carried out to determine major and minor phases. The specimens were polished with silicon carbide papers (SiC) under water cooling. Polishing was conducted on the top surfaces using 0.5 µm diamond paste and colloidal silica to obtain an acceptable optical surface for viewing under SEM. The sintered SPS-FMZ specimens were etched using 12% hydrofluoric acid for 3 min. Etched specimens were gold-coated using a sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, UK) for 30 s with 40 mA. SEM (Schottky Field Emission, Gemini Column, Oberkochen, Germany) with energy dispersive spectroscopy was used for microstructural analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electron Microscopy of Airway Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tracheae were taken from the AAV5‐CON305 and AAV5‐CTNNAL1‐RNAi mice groups. Subsequently, the tissues were fixed in cold (4℃) 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). After 1 h fixation, the samples were trimmed and then transferred to the fresh fixative at 4℃ for another 3 h. The samples were washed in cold (4℃) dilute buffer (equal volume of 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and distilled water); dehydrated in cold condition (4℃) with graded ethyl alcohol in ascending concentrations, ethyl alcohol and acetone in the ratios 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3 and with anhydrous acetone and dried using Critical Point Dryer (E3000 series; Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, UK) with liquid carbon dioxide as the transitional fluid. The tissues were then attached to stubs, coated with gold using Sputter Coater (SC7620; Quorum Technologies) and were examined with a Scanning Electron Microscope (EVO LS 10; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy was performed using TESCAN Vega3 LMU (VEGA TC), using an ETD detector and SE mode after gold coating with a sputter coater from Quorum Technologies. SEM images were acquired using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV with a beam intensity of 4 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surface Characterization by SEM-EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, the surface of the sample was coated with chromium using a sputter coater (Quorum, Oxford, UK). Images up to 12,000× magnification were taken using a SEM microscope (Quantafeg 650, Oxford, UK). Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) was performed using the detection microanalysis system (Oxford Instruments PLC, Bucks, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde and 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) in PBS overnight at 4 °C. 8 μL samples spotted onto a silicon disc coated with 0.01% (w/v) poly-l-lysine. Discs were washed twice with PBS and dehydrated with a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 100% ethanol (v/v), for 2 h each at 4 °C and 100% EtOH, for overnight). Following dehydration, samples were immersed for 5 min in pure hexamethyldisilazane (HDMS) and air dried. All specimens were mounted on aluminium stubs using double-sided carbon tape and then were sputter coated with 15 nm gold in a sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, East Sussex, UK) and observed under a Zeiss Sigma 300 Field-Emission scanning electron microscope (ZEISS). Materials are listed in Supplementary Table 13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microstructural Analysis of Flours

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microstructure of flours was studied using a scanning electron microscope (Merlin, Carl Zeiss, Germany). Flours were adhered to stubs using a double-sided carbon tape and viewed at 5 kV and 1400X after being coated with gold using a sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Nanoparticles by DLS, SEM, and FTIR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 0.1% solution of prepared NPs was made by diluting 0.001 g of NPs in 1 mL of Milli-Q® water. The prepared 0.1% solution was further diluted to 104 by serial dilution. Finally, the obtained NP solution was mixed well, and the particle size was analyzed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using Malvern Mastersizer. Lyophilized NPs were gently placed and distributed on a carbon tube, which was placed on an aluminum-based scanning electron microscopy (SEM) stub. The samples were then gold coated in a sputter coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Laughton, UK) for 60 seconds to avoid charging of the samples. SEM was performed for all the NPs using a Supra™ 55 variable pressure electron microscope. NP samples were crushed finely in an agate mortar and pestle, were mixed with potassium bromide (KBr), and were finely ground. Finally, the mixture was placed into a pelletizer to form the KBr disc containing the sample. The KBr disc was then analyzed using a Bruker Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) Vertex 70 spectrophotometer and Opus version 5.5 software (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, CA, USA; Bruker Optics Inc, Billerica, MA, USA; Opus, Inc, Houston, TX, USA) in the wave number range of 400 to 4,000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sample Preparation for Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were secured to an aluminium sample holder with carbon tape and carbon paste, which was then coated with 5 nm carbon (Quorum Technologies Turbo-Pumped Thermal Evaporators model K975X) and 5 nm chromium in a Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Sputter Coater model K575X).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Collagen Membrane Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface porosity and collagen fibril characteristics of all collagen membrane brands were observed under scanning electron microscope (JSM-6610 series, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, a layer of palladium was coated on the collagen membrane samples using a sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, United Kingdom) at a thickness of about 10 nm. SEM photography was performed at 5 to 10 kV using 100X and 500X magnifications at the smooth outer (tissue) surface and the rough inner (bone) surface of all collagen membrane squares.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Visualizing Stretched DNA Molecules

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The labeled DNA was bound to a magnetic bead of 2.8 or 5 μm in diameter and to anti-digoxigenin-coated glass. The glass was kept horizontal and the liquid sample was held on it by surface tension. The DNAs were stretched by the magnetic field. The sample was then stained with 0.25 mg mL−1 cytochrome C and 50% formamide, followed by gentle washing with pure water. The magnetic field was rotated by 90 degrees and kept steady to align the DNA molecules along the surface of the glass (Fig. 1A).
Rosette samples were prepared as described for light microscopy experiments. The cover glass was kept horizontal. A permanent magnet was placed at the side of the sample and was used to pull the cell parallel to the surface of the glass. The samples were rinsed with pure water twice. Samples were then fixed with 8% glutaraldehyde and washed gently with pure water, as described in our previous report.28 (link)The samples were dried in a desiccator. A Sputter Coater (Quorum) was used to coat a platinum film onto the glass surfaces for 60 s in the vacuum. SEM images were obtained for fine structures after stretching, using a Zeiss Merlin field-emission SEM operated at a 5 kV accelerating voltage. The images were measured using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!