The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dmi4000b inverted fluorescence microscope

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany, Italy

The DMI4000B is an inverted fluorescence microscope manufactured by Leica. It is designed for scientific and research applications that require high-performance imaging capabilities. The DMI4000B features a robust and ergonomic design, providing users with a stable and comfortable platform for their work.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using dmi4000b inverted fluorescence microscope

1

Staining Methods for Callose and Dead Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The staining methods for callose and dead cells were based on Wang et al. [41 (link)] and were repeated three times. To observe callose deposition and dead cells, 20 freshly inoculated young leaves or JA + M. oryzae-infected 36 hpi and JA + M. oryzae-infected 48 hpi young leaves of each sample were studied. To analyze callose deposition, fresh leaves were cleared with 95% ethanol and incubated in an ethanol-emulsifiable solution (glycerol:phenol:water:ethanol:lactic acid = 1:1:1:8:1) at 65 °C until the removal of the green color. The leaves were then washed with 50% ethanol, followed by sterilized water. The number of deposited callose was counted in 20 fields of vision after staining the treated leaves with 0.1% aniline blue for 1 h. Observations and photographs were taken using a DMI4000B fluorescence inverted microscope (Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany).
To observe dead cells, fresh leaves were cleaned with sterile water and incubated in 100% ethanol until the complete removal of the green color. The leaves were then stained for 24 h in DAB (3,3-diaminobezidin, 1 mg/mL, pH 5.8). The number of dead cells was measured through photographic analysis of 20 separate visual fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Callose Staining for Magnaporthe Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Callose staining was performed as Zhang et al. [4 (link)] described. Briefly, 6 fresh leaf sheaths at 0, 16, 24 and 36 h after of Magnaporthe oryzae 95234I-1b inoculation, respectively. After cleaning with 95% ethanol, plant leaves were incubated in ethanol-emulsifiable solution (phenol: glycerol: lactic acid: water: ethanol = 1:1:1:1:8) at 65°C until the green color was completely removed, washed with 50% ethanol and sterilized water. After staining in 0.1% aniline blue for 1 h, callose was observed and photographed under DMI4000B fluorescence inverted microscope (Leica Camera AG, Wetzlar, Germany), and the number of callose was counted in each treatment according to 20 field of vision.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Muscle Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle sections (0.5 cm × 0.5 cm × 1 cm) were embedded in molds with Tissue-Tek® O.C.T. Compound (Sakaru, Tokyo, Japan), cooled with liquid nitrogen, and sliced into 4 μm sections with a freezing microtome (CM1950, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Prepared samples were placed on positively charged microscope slides for H&E and immunofluorescence analyses.
Specimens were stained with H&E and then visualized under an Olympus BX43 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Three fields of view (0.35 mm × 0.35 mm) were randomly selected from each sample to assess myofiber morphological characteristics.
For immunofluorescence staining, antigens were repaired with antigen retrieval solution (Beyotime, Nanjing, China), treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide, blocked in blocking buffer (5% goat serum, 2% bovine serum albumin, and 0.2% Triton X-100), and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Slides were rewarmed to approximately 20 °C under ambient conditions and incubated with immunofluorescent secondary antibodies for 2 h. Subsequently, the slides were stained with DAPI and covered with cover slides. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using a DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica). Antibody information is listed in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Neurogenesis in the Rodent RMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were soaked for at least 24hr in 30% sucrose after the completion of imaging, then embedded in OCT and cut using a cryostat (Leica, Frankfurt, Germany) into 30μm sagittal sections. Free floating sections were stained for doublecortin (DCX). First, sections were blocked in 2% normal goat serum for 1hr and then incubated for 24hr at 1:2,000 of the primary antibody, rabbit anti-DCX (ab18723, Abcam). Sections were washed three times in PBS (10 min/wash) and then transferred into the 1:500 secondary antibody solution, goat anti-rabbit (ab150077, Abcam), for 1hr. Sections were mounted onto gelatinized slides, allowed to dry for 10 min and immediately coverslipped with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (P36961, Life Technologies). Slides were allowed to cure at room temperature overnight and then stored at −20°C until microscopy.
Gross images of the RMS were acquired at 10× magnification for all samples using a Leica DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope. These images were used to determine the thickness of the RMS at the medial bend of the stream (Corona et al., 2016 (link)) with the FIJI software and the Measure tool. Images were additionally acquired at a higher magnification (20×) using a Nikon A1 Rsi confocal laser scanning microscope at three locations along the RMS: (1) posterior near the SVZ, (2) medial bend, and (3) anterior near the olfactory bulb.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fibroblast Wound Healing Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human
fibroblast cells and mouse 3T3 fibroblast cells were seeded
in DMEM containing 10% of fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.
Cells were used between 5 and 25 passages.
Both mouse 3T3 fibroblasts
cells and human fibroblasts were seeded at 100 000 cells per
well in 24 well plates, grown to confluency and scratched with a 100
μL pipette and washed with DPBS to remove detached cells. Fresh
serum-containing media was added, and cells were treated with (i)
FGF (0.3 μM); (ii) MitC (15 μM); and (iii) curcumin (24.4
μM) for 24 h. Cells were then washed once with PBS and fixed
with paraformaldehyde (4%) for 15 min at room temperature. Cell nuclei
were labeled with Hoechst 33258 (10 μM, 10 min), and fluorescent
images of the scratch area were acquired. Fluorescent images of cells
were acquired at 20× with a Leica DFC350FX monochrome digital
camera connected to a Leica DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope.
Cell migration was quantified using ImageJ and expressed as fold change
in the number of cells in the scratch area over the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal and Fluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal imaging was performed with Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. Light microscopy imaging was performed with Leica DM IL LED inverted microscope, and fluorescence images were collected with Leica DMI4000 B inverted fluorescence microscope. Image analysis was performed with ImageJ (v1.53o).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell sections were deparaffinized in xylene, and slides hydrated in 95% ethanol for 5 min, 85% ethanol for 5 min; slides were then hydrated in distilled water. Hematoxylin staining was performed for 3 min, and slides rinsed with distilled water for 2 min; 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol was used for 2 s to differentiate the stain. The sections were rinsed with tap water for 15 min followed by 1–2 s of distilled water. Slides were stained with eosin for 30 s. Differentiation was determined according to the color, and 80% ethanol was used to differentiate stains. Slides were further dehydrated with 85% ethanol for 5 min, followed by 95% ethanol for 5 min. Then, the slides were dehydrated with anhydrous ethanol for 10 min. After the run off was transparent, slides were sealed by adding a drop of neutral gum. Observation and photography were performed with a microscope (Dmi4000b inverted fluorescence microscope, Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing Pdr11p with GFP Tagging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were examined under a Leica DMI4000 B inverted fluorescence microscope using a 63x water objective. GFP was visualised with an excitation filter BP 470/40, beam splitter 500, and BP 525/50 barrier filter. Flow cytometry of cells expressing GFP-tagged Pdr11p was performed as described previously [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Staining of Muscle Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GCPMs and primary myotube cells (GCPMTs) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 0.5 h, followed by three washes with PBS for 5 min each time. The cells were then permeabilized with 0.5% triton X-100 at room temperature for 0.5 h and washed three times with PBS for 5 min each. Subsequently, the samples were blocked with 5% goat serum for 0.5 h and finally incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (Desmin diluted 1:100 and MYHC diluted 1:5). Following this, the cells were washed three times with PBS for 5 min each and incubated at room temperature for 1 h with a second antibody according to the type of secondary antibody (diluted at 1:1,000). Cells were finally stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 10 min at room temperature and covered with glass cover slides. Antibodies information is listed in Table S3. For the paraffin section of muscle tissue immunofluorescence staining, the 5 μmol/L slices were repaired with antigen repair solution (0.2 g citric acid + 1.5 g trisodium citrate diluted with 500 mL pure water), treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and then blocked. The blocking and subsequent steps consisted of the immune crown staining of cells. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using a DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica). The information on primary and secondary antibodies and DAPI is given in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EV Uptake Detection and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect EV uptake, EVs were first labeled with the lipophilic red fluorescent dioctadecyl (DiD) Vybrant stain (Invitrogen). A total of 100 μg of HEK293EVs and NK3.3EVs in 50 μL PBS were each labeled with 1 μL of 50 μM DiD stain for 20 min at 37 °C. After incubation, 450 μL PBS was added to the EVs, followed by 167 μL ExoQuick. Suspensions were mixed gently and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. Tubes were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, supernatants aspirated, and EV pellets resuspended in 50 μL PBS and applied to cells. Monolayer and mammosphere cells were seeded as described above. After EV treatment, cells and spheres were gently washed to remove non-internalized EVs. Control cells were incubated with DiD alone. HFF and MDA-MB-231 monolayer cells and MCF7 mammospheres were imaged in situ with a Leica DMI4000B inverted fluorescence microscope. MCF7 U-bottom spheres were imaged in situ with the Leica inverted fluorescence microscope, a Bio-Rad ZOE fluorescent cell imager, and inverted phase microscope.
EV-treated HEK293 and GFP+ MCF7 spheres were removed from wells, washed with PBS, fixed in 100 μL 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 30 min, and then transferred in PFA to covered glass chamber slides. Images were obtained by Leica spinning-disk or confocal fluorescence microscopes in the Research Microscopy and Histology Core, Saint Louis University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!