The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sigma 3 18ks

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany

The Sigma 3-18KS is a versatile laboratory centrifuge designed for a wide range of applications. It features a maximum speed of 18,000 rpm and a maximum relative centrifugal force (RCF) of 30,130 x g. The centrifuge accommodates a variety of rotor options, allowing users to customize the equipment to their specific needs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using sigma 3 18ks

1

Enzymatic Degradation of PMB-Loaded Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enzymatic
degradation of free PMB and PMB being incorporated into NPs was evaluated
with lipase. Lipase solution was prepared by dissolving 0.5 g of the
enzyme in 10 mL of digestion medium (2 mM Tris buffer with 5 mM CaCl2 and 150 mM NaCl). After homogenization for 10 min, the enzyme
mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm (Sigma 3-18KS, Austria) for
15 min at 4 °C.17 (link) Thereafter, 2 mL
of the supernatant liquid was added to 4 mL of 0.01% (m/v) PMB–PP
NPs suspension and incubated at 37 °C under constant shaking
using a ThermoMixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Aliquots of 100
μL were withdrawn at predetermined time points (0, 1, 2, 4,
6, 12, and 24 h) and transferred to a 96-well microplate (μClear
96-well plates, Greiner bio-one, Austria). PMB–PP NPs and PMB
suspension without lipase served as negative control and were incubated
under the same conditions. Absorbance was measured at a wavelength
of 210 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Infinite M200; Grödig,
Austria). The same settings were applied for PMB. The PMB concentration
was determined using a calibration curve with increasing concentrations
of PMB ranging from 0.78 to 50 μM.
Degradation was evaluated
by quantifying the % remaining amount of PMB by the following equation:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Citrate Synthase Activity in Paclitaxel-Treated Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain and spinal cord fragments from animals treated with paclitaxel, in the presence or absence of CAIs, were homogenized in isolation buffer (composition: sucrose 250 mM, Tris 5 mM, EGTA 1 mM, Triton X-100 0,02%; pH 7.4) using a GentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bologna, Italy). The homogenates obtained were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C (Sigma 3-18KS, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The supernatant was used to measure the activity of CS. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically (EnSpire, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) by the Bradford assay. The enzymatic reaction was performed in 10 μg/mL of protein (Trizma base 100 mM, 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic) acid 100 μM, acetylcoenzyme A 100 μM, and oxaloacetic acid 500 μM) as previously described [60 (link)]. The kinetics were evaluated spectrophotometrically at 412 nm every 30 s for 15 min. The isolated enzyme (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for the calibration line.
Data analysis. CS activity was evaluated on five brain and five spinal cord tissue samples per group. Enzymatic activity was expressed in mU/mL. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software. Student’s t-test was used for the statistical analysis (p < 0.05 was considered as the limit of statistical significance).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Silica Nanoparticle Surface Modification and Emulsification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Silica nanoparticles were modified prior to emulsification with either APTES or DTES precursors as follows: 1% w/v fumed silica nanoparticles were dispersed in 10 mL toluene (for DTES modification), or 10 mL ethanol (for APTES modification). 0.5 mL of the organosilane precursor were then added to the respective silica dispersion, out of a stock solution of 0.2 M reagent in the relevant solvent. The reaction vessel was then shaken by ELMI Intelli Mixer RM-2M at 70 rpm and 99° rotation for 1 h under ambient conditions. The modified silica nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation (9000 rpm for 10 min at 25 °C, using a Sigma 3-18KS centrifuge from Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Germany). The separated particles were then rinsed twice with the relevant solvent in order to remove unreacted and physically adsorbed species from product; after each rinsing the particles were separated from solution by centrifugation under the same conditions as specified before. The product, either SiO2–DTES or SiO2–APTES particles, was dried at 35 °C under vacuum for 3 h.
1% w/v SiO2–DTES or SiO2–APTES particles were dispersed in a 10 mL water and toluene 1 : 1 v/v mixture, which was emulsified by sonication for 30 min. The emulsions were then stored under ambient conditions prior to further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Purification of Exopolysaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cultivated bacterial liquid was placed in a 100°C water bath for 10 min to inactivate the enzymes. The bacterial solution was centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C and 8,000 rpm. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation, 12% trichloroacetic acid solution of half the volume of the supernatant was added, and the proteins were removed from the supernatant after stirring for 30 min. Following centrifugation at 4°C at 8,000 rpm for 15 min (Sigma 3-18KS, Harzberg am Harz, Germany), the supernatant was collected, mixed with 2–3 times its volumes of 95% ethanol solution, and precipitated overnight. Then, the solution was centrifuged at 4°C and 8,000 rpm for 15 min to obtain a precipitate containing EPSs, after which it was weighed [11 (link),17 (link)].
Based on the quality of the EPSs, the precipitate was diluted with sterile water to prepare EPS solutions with different concentrations. After preparation, the bacteria were removed using a 0.22 µm filter (Millipore, MA, USA) and used as a backup (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anaerobic Pore-Water Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cores were sectioned for pore-water collection in an anaerobic glove box (N2 atmosphere with 3–5% H2; Coy lab products, USA). Cores were sectioned at 0.5 cm resolution from 0 to 6 cm depth and 1 cm resolution between 6 and 12 cm depth. Sediment slices were collected in 50 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes (TPP, Switzerland) and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min (Sigma 3–18KS, Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Germany). Subsequently, the centrifuge tubes were opened in the anaerobic glove box, and overlying pore water was transferred into suitable sample containers after filtration through 0.45 μm cellulose filters (Millex-HA filter, Merck Millipore, USA). Pore-water samples were analyzed for dissolved iron and dissolved As. To prevent oxidation, the solid phase that remained after centrifugation was freeze-dried and sealed in an airtight aluminum bag inside the anaerobic glove box and stored anaerobically for later solid-phase analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Extraction from Brain Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After excision of the brain tissues, tissue sections (10 mg) were prepared, turned into small pieces using a grinder, and were transferred to the 1 mL YTzol Pure RNA solution (YEKTA TAJHIZ AZMA, Iran). RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly homogenized samples were incubated for 5 min at 15°C to 30°C. Then, 200 μL of chloroform was added to the sample tube and vigorously shook for 15 s. The sample tube was incubated at room temperature for 2–3 min. The specimens were centrifuged at 12000 × g for 10 min at 4°C (Sigma 3-18KS, Germany). The transparent supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 mL nuclease-free Eppendorf tube, and 500 μL isopropanol was added. The tubes were mixed well by inverting several times. The samples were incubated at 15°C–30°C for 10 min and centrifuged at 12000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Then, RNA washing was done using 1 mL of 75% ethanol (in nuclease-free water) (CinnaGen, Iran). The precipitant was dissolved in 20 μL of nuclease-free water, and the purity of the extracted RNA was determined through the A260/A280 ratio using the NanoDrop system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Emulsion Stability Evaluation of Botanical Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, a 4% sodium alginate solution was prepared from distilled water and alginic acid sodium salt. It was used throughout the experiment for emulsion preparation as the shell material. Emulsion with Trifolium pratense L. and Glycyrrhiza glabra L. extracts, and Myristica fragrans Houtt. essential oil were prepared as follows: solution with excipients (maltodextrin, inulin, and/ or gum Arabic) was mixed with sodium alginate solution (stirred for 15 min with a magnetic stirrer MSH-20A (Witeg, Wertheim, Germany)) and then extracts with essential oil were added. The solution was homogenised for 15 min at 5000 rpm using an IKA T18 homogeniser (IKA-Werke GmbH & Co., KG, Staufen, Germany).
The emulsion’s stability was tested using a centrifuge Sigma 3-18KS (Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The test was repeated three times using 23 °C temperature, 3000 rpm, and the duration was 5 min. The centrifugation index (CI) was calculated to evaluate emulsion stability.
CI(%)=VeVi·100
where Ve is the volume of the remaining emulsion after centrifugation and Vi is the volume of the initial emulsion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nutmeg Oil Emulsion Formulation and Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 4% sodium alginate solution was prepared from distilled water and alginic acid sodium salt. It was used throughout the experiment for emulsion preparation as the shell material. Emulsion with polysorbate 80 was prepared as follows: 4% sodium alginate solution (5 g, 10 g, and 15 g) was diluted with distilled water (10 mL, 5 mL, 0 mL), a surfactant (0.5 g, 1 g, 1.5 g) was added, everything was stirred with a magnetic stirrer MSH-20A (Witeg, Germany) for 10 min and then the nutmeg essential oil (0.5 g, 1 g, 1.5 g) was added. The emulsion was stirred for 15 min. The absorbent magnesium aluminometasilicate (0.2 g and 0.4 g) was used in several samples; this material was added before the essential oil.
The emulsion with Sisterna SP70 was prepared by three different methods (Figure 1).
The stability of each emulsion was tested using a centrifuge Sigma 3-18KS (Sigma Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The test was carried out in these conditions: 3000 rpm, temperature 23 °C, and duration 5 min. All samples were tested three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Blood Collection and Serum Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were anesthetized
using isoflurane, and blood samples (1 mL) were collected from the
lateral tail vein in 1.5 mL autocued plastic tubes between 9:00 am
and 12:00 pm (dark cycle). The samples were allowed to stand for 10
min before centrifuging (Sigma 3-18KS, Germany) at 3000 rpm (800g) for 10 min at 23 °C, after which serum was collected
into duplicate 0.5 mL autocued plastic tubes and stored at −80
°C until assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Egyptian Date Palm Pollen Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pollen of Egyptian date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) were harvested at the end of the March 2021 and 2022 seasons at the beginning of opening covers of the male species from Rashed city, Elbehyra Governorate, Egypt. The extract of pollen was prepared according to the authors of [95 (link)], with some modifications, as follows: to prepare the water pollen extract, 0.1 g of pollen grains was added to 10.0 mL of distilled water. After one hour, the mixture was sonicated using a VCX 750 ultrasonic probe (SONICS & MATERIALS, INC., Newtown, CT, USA) (frequency of 6 kHz), cut for 30 s, and then centrifuged (Sigma 3–18 KS, SIGMA Laborzentrifugen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany) at 5000 rpm for 10 m in at a temperature of 20 °C. The resulting supernatant was used as the water pollen extract in all the experiments. Then, the volume was completed with water to obtain the used concentrations (10 and 20 g/L) [56 ]. The tested bio-stimulant was applied as a foliar spray thrice. The 1st and 2nd sprays were carried out after transplanting at 32 and 62 days, respectively, and the third one was conducted 22 days after the first cut. For the NPs and DPPE, tween 80 was applied as a sticking agent in each spray. The spraying was carried out with a hand sprayer in the morning. The plants were sprayed till the spray ran off.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!