Thermo finnigan ltq linear iontrap mass spectrometer

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed as described earlier [77 (link)]. Dried peptide extracts were dissolved in 100 µL of 0.1% formic acid and analyzed on a nano-HPLC system (LC-20nano, Shimadzu; Vienna, Austria). Then, 50 µL samples were injected and concentrated on the loading column (LC Packings C18 Pep- Map™, 5 µm, 100 Å, 300 µm inner diameter × 1 mm) for 5 min using 0.1% formic acid as isocratic solvent at a flow rate of 20 µL/min. The column was then switched into the nanoflow circuit, and the sample was loaded on the nanocolumn (LC-Packings C18 PepMap™, 75 µm inner diameter × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min and separated using the following gradient: solvent A: water, 0.3% formic acid, solvent B: acetonitrile/water (80/20, v/v), 0.3% formic acid; 0 to 5 min: 4% B, after 40 min 55% B, then for 5 min 90% B and 47 min reequilibration at 4% B. The sample was ionized in a Finnigan nano-ESI source equipped with NanoSpray tips (PicoTip™ Emitter, New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA) and analyzed in a Thermo-Finnigan LTQ linear iontrap mass-spectrometer (Thermo, San Jose, CA, USA). MS/MS data were analyzed by searching the SwissProt public database with SpectrumMill Rev. B.04.01.141 (Agilent, Darmstadt, Germany) software. Acceptance was a protein score of >20 and individual peptide scores >7.5.

Protein-containing bands were excised from gels and digested with trypsin according to the method by Shevchenko et al. (22 (link)). Peptide extracts were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid and separated on a nano-HPLC system (Ultimate 3000™, LC Packings, Amsterdam, Netherlands). 70 μl samples were injected and concentrated on the loading column (LC Packings C18 Pep- Map™, 5 μm, 100 Å, 300 μm inner diameter × 1 mm) for 5 min using 0.1% formic acid as isocratic solvent at a flow rate of 20 μl/min. The column was then switched into the nanoflow circuit, and the sample was loaded on the nanocolumn (LC-Packings C18 PepMap™, 75 μm inner diameter × 150 mm) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min and separated using the following gradient: solvent A: water, 0.3% formic acid, solvent B: acetonitrile/water 80/20 (v/v), 0.3% formic acid; 0–5 min: 4% B, after 40 min 55% B, then for 5 min 90% B and 47 min re-equilibration at 4% B. The sample was ionized in a Finnigan nano-ESI source equipped with NanoSpray tips (PicoTip™ Emitter, New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA) and analyzed in a Thermo-Finnigan LTQ linear ion-trap mass-spectrometer (Thermo, San Jose, CA, USA). The MS/MS data were analyzed by searching the SwissProt public database with SpectrumMill Rev. 03.03.078 (Agilent, Darmstadt, GER) software.