The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rotaflex ru 200

Manufactured by Rigaku
Sourced in Japan

The Rotaflex RU-200 is a versatile X-ray diffractometer designed for materials analysis. It features a rotating anode X-ray source that provides high-intensity X-ray beams for precise diffraction measurements. The instrument is capable of performing a range of analytical techniques, including powder diffraction, thin-film analysis, and single-crystal diffraction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using rotaflex ru 200

1

Polymer Film X-ray Diffraction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diffraction patterns of the polymer films were obtained on a Rigaku Rotaflex RU-200 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a rotating copper anode (characteristic radiation wavelength 0.1542 nm). Flat films were fixed in 6 layers on an aluminum frame. The exposure was carried out in the “transmission” geometry in the angular range of 2.5–50 degrees in 2θ according to the Bragg–Brentano scheme. Then the resulting diffraction patterns were processed using the Fityk program; after subtracting the background line, they were presented as a sum of several Gaussian peaks. The angular position of these peaks was recalculated into the interplanar distances using the Bragg equation. The peak areas were used to calculate the specific intensities of the maxima (from the ratio of the total intensity of all observed peaks), and the sizes of their characteristic coherent scattering regions (CSRs) were estimated from their integral widths using the Scherrer equation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polymer Diffraction Pattern Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diffraction patterns of the polymer samples were obtained using a Rigaku Rotaflex RU-200 X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a rotating copper anode (characteristic radiation wavelength 0.1542 nm). The flat films were fixed in 6 layers on an aluminum frame, and the shooting was carried out in the “transmission” geometry in the angular range of 2.5–50 degrees in 2θ according to the Bragg–Brentano scheme. Next, the resulting diffraction patterns were processed using the Fityk program; after subtracting the background line, they were presented as a sum of several Gauss peaks. The positions of these peaks were recalculated into the interplanar spacing using the Wulf–Bragg formula.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Membrane Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffraction spectra were obtained using a Rigaku Rotaflex RU-200 (Tokyo, Japan) with a rotating copper anode (Cu Kα, emission; Ni, filter) at apparatus operating conditions 30 kV–100 mA. X-ray photography was performed using a horizontal wide-angle goniometer, the Rigaku D/MAX-RC (Tokyo, Japan), using the Bragg–Brentano scheme in θ–2θ geometry. Scanning was carried out at a 5–55° angle range at 2θ, with a speed of 2°/min and 0.04° increment. A scintillation counter was used as a detector of the diffracted X-ray emission. Measurements were taken at 20 °C and at −190 °C. A specialized low-temperature attachment was used to obtain a diffraction pattern of the specimen, cooled down to liquid nitrogen temperature (−196 °C). Membrane specimens with a thickness of 500 μm were mounted to a vertical copper table. The diffraction patterns that were obtained were processed using the Fityk program (by Marcin Wojdyr, Poland): background noise was subtracted, and diffraction patterns were approximated using the deconvolution technique by the sum of several Gaussian peaks [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of ACC-DOX-SF NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of ACC-DOX-SF NPs was observed using a TEM (JEM-1200, JEOL, Japan) and FESEM (Hitachi SU8010, Japan). DLS measurements were performed using a Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, USA). The UV-Vis-NIR spectrum of NPs were detected using a UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Japan). The polymorphs of different NPs were measured by XRD (Rotaflex RU-200, Rigaku, Japan) and FTIR (Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer). TG analyses of the NP powders were conducted by a STA-449C (Netzsch Co.) machine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Crystalline Structure Analysis of CS/ND Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the crystalline structure of the CS/ND nanocomposites, a Rigaku (Rotaflex Ru-200) X-ray diffractometer with a Co Kα line radiation resource was used. CS/ND nanocomposites were collected and mounted on the stage and analyzed in the scanning range from 5° to 70° in increments of 0.05° at a step size of 2 sec/step. The operation voltage and current of the X-ray source was 35 kV and 30 mA, respectively.
Detailed crystallinity is determined under the assumption that the areas are proportional to the scattering intensities of crystalline and amorphous phases [35 (link)]. Thus, the diffraction profile is separated into 2 parts: peaks are related to diffraction of crystallites, broad alone is related to scattering of amorphous, and the degree of crystallinity Xc is measured as the ratio of crystalline area to total area.
Xc=AcrAcr+KAam
where Xc = degree of crystallinity; Acr = Area of crystalline phase; Aam = Area of amorphous phase K = a constant related to the different scattering factors of crystalline and amorphous phases. For relative measures, K = 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Crystallite Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction analysis was performed at room temperature using a Rigaku (Oume, Japan) Rotaflex RU-200. Cr-Kα radiation with Bragg–Brentano focusing was used. The particle size of the active phase was calculated according to the Scherrer equation. The average crystallite sizes were calculated using the Debye–Scherrer formula:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Hybrid Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and ζ-potential of nanoparticles were determined with a Zetasizer (Nano ZS90; Malvern, UK). The morphology of nanoparticles was observed using TEM (JEM-1200; JEOL, Japan). The structural formation of hybrid nanoparticles was verified by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; FT/IR-4100; Jasco, Japan). The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) spectrum of hybrid nanoparticles was recorded using a Rotaflex RU-200 (Rigaku, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!