The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 well plate

Manufactured by Techno Plastic Products
Sourced in Switzerland

The 12-well plates are a type of laboratory equipment used for various cell culture and assay applications. Each plate contains 12 individual wells, providing a convenient platform for multiple experiments or sample processing. The plates are made of durable plastic materials and are designed to be reusable or disposable, depending on the specific requirements of the application.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using 12 well plate

1

In Vitro Co-Culture of Keratinocytes and Endothelial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human HaCaT keratinocytes and HSVECs (Provitro, Berlin, Germany) were co-cultured in vitro using cell culture inserts. A total of 7000 HaCaT cells were seeded onto the NF membranes in 0.5 mL of DMEM with 2% FBS and, after the 3 h required for cell adhesion, the membranes were placed in cell culture inserts with a pore size of 0.4 μm (Cat. No. 140652, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). In addition, 20,000 HSVECs were seeded on 12-well plate (Techno Plastic Products, Trasadingen, Switzerland). The inserts bearing the NF membranes with keratinocytes were then placed on top of the wells with the HSVECs, as illustrated in Figure 2. At the beginning of the co-culturing process, 0.5 mL of the medium used for the HaCaT cells was added to the inserts and 1 mL of the HSVECs medium was added to the wells. The cells were co-cultured for 7 and 14 days. Both media were replaced twice, i.e., after 7 and 11 days, in the case of the 14-day experiment. The HaCaT cells were cultured in DMEM with 2% FBS. Low-supplemented EGM-2 containing FBS, heparin, ascorbic acid and hydrocortisone was used for the HSVECs. In parallel, monocultures of each of the cell types were established in the same culture setting and the same growth medium (Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wound Healing Assay for ES2 and CAFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ES2 cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells/well in a 12-well plate (Techno Plastic Products) and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 overnight. A vertical scratch was made on the ES2 monolayer cells using a toothpick. Cells were rinsed with PBS to remove dislodged cells and 24 h conditioned media from CAFs was added to the ES2 cells. The plate was then incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h. Time zero and 24 h pictures were taken using a microscope at 4×. Migration area was determined using the wound healing size tool plugin in ImageJ. Percent migration was calculated as the percent change in wound healing area over 24 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of TLR3/TLR9 Expression in HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells were seeded onto 12-well plates (Techno Plastic Products) at 2.2×105 cells/well. After 24 h, at 50% confluence, they were transfected with TLR3, TLR9, TLR3-TLR9 chimeric constructs and control vector pcDNA3 (900 ng DNA/well). 48 h after transfection, the cells were lysed using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% DOC) with Complete Mini protease inhibitors (Roche), sonicated and centrifuged. The protein-containing supernatants were harvested and the total protein amount was quantified using the BCA protein assay (Sigma-Aldrich). The cell extracts (30 μg of total proteins) were incubated at 65°C for 5 min in sample buffer (SDS with 2-mercaptoethanol) and loaded onto a 12% SDS-PAGE gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes Hybond-ECL (GE Healthcare) and detected with following primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-TLR3 (IMG-315A, Imgenex), rabbit anti-HA (H6908, Sigma-Aldrich), mouse anti-β-actin (3700, Cell Signaling). Used secondary antibodies were: goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (sc-2005, Santa Cruz) and goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (ab6721, Abcam). The blots were developed using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce). Membranes were recorded with G:BOX Chemi using GeneSnap software (Syngene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Janthinobacterium sp. SLB01 Biofilm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We estimated the biofilm formation of the Janthinobacterium sp. SLB01 strain grown in 12-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) in LB broth at temperatures of 3, 22, and 30 °C. The biofilm amount was determined at regular time intervals according to a previously described method [11 (link)]. The wells of the plate were carefully emptied and washed twice with sterile 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) every 24 h. Then, 5 mL of an aqueous solution of 0.1% safranin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The dye was removed with 0.01 M PBS buffer. Then, the plates were inverted onto filter paper (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and dried for 3 h. Safranin was extracted with a mixture of ethanol 96% and acetone (80:20 v/v). The biofilm formation was quantified by measuring the optical density (OD484) of each sample using a spectrophotometer (GBC Scientific Equipment Ltd.—Cintra 20, Melbourne, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Violacein Production in Janthinobacterium sp. SLB01

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Janthinobacterium sp. SLB01 strain was grown in 12-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) with LB broth at temperatures of 3, 22, and 30 °C to assess the accumulation of violacein. Violacein was extracted according to the previously described technique [11 (link)]. Bacterial cells from a single well were harvested by centrifugation at 16,000× g for 15 min every 24 h. The cells were lysed with 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (v/v) (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany), and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Then, water-saturated butanol (1:2) was added and shaken. The upper phase, containing violacein, was separated from the aqueous phase by centrifugation at 16,000× g for 10 min. The extracted violacein was quantified using a spectrophotometer (OD585) (GBC Scientific Equipment Ltd.—Cintra 20, Melbourne, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating ZIKV-Induced Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluation of cell migration was performed as previously described by Valster et al (22 (link)). U-251, U-138 and Vero cells were seeded in 12-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG) and cultured until they reached 80% confluence, as observed using the EVOS microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were subjected to a progressive reduction in FBS concentration from 10 to 5%, and then to the final FBS concentration of 0.5%; cells were incubated with each concentration of FBS for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were exposed to ZIKV at a range of MOIs for 2 h. Cells were washed with DPBS and a scratch wound were created on the cell monolayers using a P200 pipette tip. DPBS was removed and cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS. Images were captured at 0, 12 and 24 h. The images were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software (version 7; Media Cybernetics, Inc.) and the cell migration distance was determined as follows: (Initial width of the wound ×0.5)-(width of the wound/2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Megakaryocyte Differentiation from Whole Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For MK and platelet experiments, 15–25 ml of whole blood was collected by venipuncture from two healthy controls, P3, P4 and P5 in the presence of 1.6 mg/ml EDTA. As access to patient blood was limited, these experiments were performed once (n = 1), with all samples processed in parallel. MKs were differentiated from whole blood samples using a protocol adapted from Balduini et al.66 (link) Briefly, PBMCs were isolated from using Lymphosep (C C Pro, Oberdorla, Germany). Up to 2 × 106 PBMCs were seeded per well in 12-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) with StemSpan ACF medium (StemCell, Vancouver, Canada) supplemented with 10 ng/ml TPO, FLT3-L, IL-6, and IL-11 (all cytokines from Peprotech, Hamburg, Germany). On day 4, APEL2 medium (StemCell) supplemented with 5% Protein-free Hybridoma Medium II (PFHMII, Gibco by Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) and the same cytokine composition was used. On days 1 or 2, 7, 10, and 14, cell morphology was assessed by microscopy and phenotype was analyzed by flow cytometry. For flow cytometry, cells were blocked with FcR-blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and stained with CD42a-PE (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), CD41-APC/Cy7, and CD61-APC (both Biolegend, San Diego, USA). Analysis was performed using a FACS Canto II and FACSDiva software v8.0.1 (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody Array-Based Profiling of Angiogenesis and Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to investigate the regulation of the proteins involved in angiogenesis and inflammation processes, specific antibody arrays were performed using RayBiotech®® C-Series Human Angiogenesis Array C1000 (code: AAH-ANG-1000, RayBiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA) and RayBiotech®® C-Series Human Inflammation Array C3 (code: AAH-INF-3, RayBiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA, USA). For this aim, PC3, DU145 and HUVEC cell lines (3.8 × 105 cells) were seeded in 12-well plates (TPP Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland) and kept overnight for attachment. For the detection of proteins, PC3 and DU145 cells were treated for 24 h at a concentration of Dt of 44.1 pM, while HUVEC cells were pre-treated for 1 h with tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) at a concentration of 10 ng mL−1 before the treatment with 44.1 pM of Dt for 24 h.
After incubation, cell medium was collected. Protein concentration and purity were assessed using the NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For each condition tested, 1 mL of sample was used to perform specific antibody array, according to manufacturer’s protocol. Blots were analyzed using ImageLab software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and results shown in terms of relative expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transient Transfection of HEK293T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells (2 × 105) were seeded in 12-well plates (Techno Plastic Products). The next
day, at a confluence of 50–70%, the cells were transiently
transfected with a mixture of DNA and PEI (8 μL PEI/1000 ng
DNA). Forty-eight hours post-transfection, the cells were washed with
1 mL PBS and lysed in 100 μL 1 × Passive lysis buffer (Promega).
The cells were lysed for 20 min on ice and centrifuged for 15 min
at 14 000 rpm to remove cell debris. The total protein concentration
in the supernatant was determined using the BCA assay.
Proteins
from the supernatant were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels (200 V, 45
min) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (350 mA, 60 min).
Membrane blocking, antibody binding, and membrane washing were performed
using an iBind Flex Western device (ThermoFisher) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. The primary antibodies were mouse-anti
Myc (Cell Signaling Technology 2276; diluted 1:2000). The secondary
antibodies were HRP-conjugated goat antimouse IgG, diluted 1:3000
(Jackson ImmunoResearch 115-035-003). The secondary antibodies were
detected with an ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Super Signal
West Femto; ThermoFisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!