The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using total dietary fiber assay kit

1

Standardized Quantification of Food Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard solutions of minerals were purchased from Quimlab Química & Metrologia® (São Paulo, Brazil). Ion exchange column AG® 1-X8 was purchased from BIO RAD (Hercules, CA, USA). Kjeldahl catalyst was purchased from Vetec (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Suprapur® sodium acetate, EMSURE anhydrous magnesium sulphate and formic acid were obtained from MERCK® (Darmstadt, Germany). Anthocyanin and non-anthocyanin standards were purchased respectively from Indofine Chemical Co. (Hillsborough, NJ, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA and Milwaukee, WI, USA). The reference materials for pesticides were purchased from AccuStandard (New Haven, CT, USA) and Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Augsburg, Germany). Phytic acid was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit was purchase from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All solvents were High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade from Tedia (Fairfield, OH, USA) or MERCK® (Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC grade water (Milli-Q System, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used throughout the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dietary Fiber Analysis of Ingredients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The insoluble and soluble fiber in the ingredients, the mixtures and the extruded products were determined with the total dietary fiber assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to method 991.43 of AOAC [19 ]. The analyses were carried out in triplicate for each treatment, and the results were expressed in g/100 g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dietary Phytate and Nutrient Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dietary phytate was calculated relative to total phosphorus released from diet and flour samples by phytase and alkaline phosphatase enzymes according to manufacturer’s instructions (K-PHYT 11/15. Megazyme International. Bray, Ireland). Total dietary carbon (%) and nitrogen (%) was measured via Dumas combustion using a TruMac® CN (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA) with total protein (%) for wheat diet samples equal to 5.7 × total nitrogen (%). Total dietary fiber was measured via enzymatic digestion using heat-resistant amylase, protease and amyloglucosidase according to manufacturer’s instructions (Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Quantification of NA and DMA in diet and flour samples was performed as described in25 (link). Briefly, sequential MeOH (100%) and 18MΩ H2O sample were derivatized by 9-fluorenylmethoxycarboxyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) and quantified via RP LC-MS on a 1290 Infinity II and 6490 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Dietary Fiber Using Enzymatic Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dietary fiber was determined through a combination of enzymatic and gravimetric methods. Dietary fiber content was determined using the total dietary fiber assay kit (Sigma‐Aldrich Co., USA) based on the AOAC 985.26 method. Defatted samples were weighed into beakers (0.5 g) and gelatinized using α‐amylase. Then, they were enzymatically digested with 5 mg of protease and 0.1 mL of amyloglucosidase to remove the protein and starch present in the sample. Ethanol (200 mL) was then added to precipitate the soluble dietary fiber. The residue was then filtered and washed with ethanol and acetone. After drying in a vacuum oven at 70°C, the residue was weighed. Half of the samples were analyzed for protein and the others were ashed. Total dietary fiber is the weight of the residue minus the weight of the protein and ash.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nitrogen and Fiber Analysis of Cooked Beans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total nitrogen concentrations were measured in a 500 mg sample of cooked beans by the Dumas combustion method at A&L Great Lakes Laboratories (Fort Wayne, IN, USA) in accordance with AOAC method 968.06 [34 ]. The percentage of crude protein was estimated by multiplying the dry weight total nitrogen concentration by a factor of 6.25 [35 ]. Insoluble, soluble and total fiber concentrations were determined by the enzymatic-gravimetric AOAC method 985.29 [36 ], using enzymatic hydrolysis with heat-resistant amylase, protease, and amyloglucosidase (Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit, Sigma Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Anti-Inflammatory and Metabolic Effects of U. prolifera

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U. prolifera was obtained from East Green Biotech, Inc. (Taitung, Taiwan). IL-6 and TNF-α) uncoated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA). ACC, anti-AMPK, anti-pAMPK, HSL, anti-pHSL, and anti-β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Anti-adiponectin, anti-CPT1A, anti-PPARα, and anti-PPARγ were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-IL-1β was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). Total dietary fiber assay kit was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). InnuPREP Stool DNA kit was purchased form Analytic Jena (Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Jussara Fruit Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples of jussara before and after the fermentation process were evaluated in triplicate according to the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists methodology (AOAC, 2005 ). The fat contents were determined by the Rose–Gottlieb method. Total solids contents were determined by drying the sample in a vacuum oven at 70°C for 24 h. Protein analyzes were performed based on the determination of nitrogen by the micro-Kjeldahl method. The protein content was calculated by multiplying the nitrogen value by 6.25. The incineration of the sample determined the ashes in muffle at 550°C. The carbohydrate content was calculated by the difference between the total solids and the sum of the fat, protein, moisture, and ash contents. The enzymatic–gravimetric method 991.43 (AOAC, 2005 ) was used for fiber determination, which was performed in quadruplicate and using Sigma-Aldrich reagents and Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit (Megazyme brand). The pH values were measured using a digital potentiometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Determination of Antioxidant Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kjeldahl tablets (without addition of Se and Hg) were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The standards of chlorogenic acids (5-, 4-, and 3-caffeoylquinic acids), caffeine, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, sodium nitrite, epicatechin, ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, and trolox, as well as 2,2 diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), ferric chloride, aluminum chloride, 2,4,6 tripyridyl-S-triazine (TPTZ), sodium acetate, and total dietary fiber assay kit were all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Absolute ethanol (≥99.8%) and HPLC-grade methanol were obtained from Honeywell Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany). Glacial acetic acid was from VWR Chemicals (Fontenay-sou-Bois, France). A Seralpur PRO 60 CN and Seradest LFM 20 water purification system was used to obtain ultrapure water. All other chemicals were of analytical grade from several suppliers: Panreac (Barcelona, Spain), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and Carlo Erba (Emmendingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Nutrient Profile Analysis of CBS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Moisture content of CBS was determined using a variation of AOAC method 927.05 by drying for 18 h at 70 °C in vacuum oven. Total fat content of blended CBS was determined using a modified AOAC method 945.16. In this last method, Soxhlet extraction of CBS (1 g with 150 mL) was carried out using petroleum ether as solvent for 6 h. Ash content was measured by AOAC method 942.05, charring 2 g of blended CBS for 30 min, followed by incineration in a muffle furnace (5 h at 525 °C). Crude protein content was determined on 0.1 g of blended CBS by Dumas method [24 (link)] with a FP 628 analyser (LECO Corporation, St Joseph, MI, USA). Carbohydrate content (% dry weight) of blended CBS will be determined as: 100(crude fat+ash+crude protein)
Dietary fiber content was determined on 1 g of blended CBS using the total dietary fiber assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MI, USA) and a modified AOAC method 985.29 [25 ], in which α-amylase, protease and amyloglucosidase activities were used to digest the starting material. The remaining fiber was precipitated with ethanol, washed with ethanol and acetone, filtered, and, once dry, its protein and ash content were determined and subtracted from the dry weight. All analyses were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Dietary Fiber and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins and soluble and insoluble fibers were determined by the gravimetric-enzymatic method, AOAC International, using a total dietary fiber assay kit, Sigma®, San Luis, MO, USA [55 ]. More specifically, the analysis of protein content was performed in three repetitions and determined by the micro-Kjeldhal method, while total dietary fiber was performed in two repetitions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!