The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Maxfilter

Manufactured by Elekta

MaxFilter is a laboratory equipment product that provides a physical filtration solution. It is designed to remove unwanted particles or contaminants from liquid or gas samples, enhancing the purity and quality of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using maxfilter

1

MEG Data Preprocessing for Neuroimaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.2; Elekta), MEG data from each participant were individually corrected for head movement and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu & Simola 2006 (link)). MEG data were then coregistered with structural T1-weighted MRI data using BESA MRI (V2.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MEG Data Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer MSR with active shielding engaged. With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors, including 102 magnetometers and 204 planar gradiometers (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.2.1; Elekta), MEG data from each subject were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu et al., 2005 ; Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link)). All analyses for this study were focused on the data collected by the 204 gradiometers. For motion correction, the position of the head throughout the recording was aligned to the individual’s head position when the recording was initiated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Magnetically-Shielded MEG Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer magnetically-shielded room (MSR)
with active shielding engaged. With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz,
neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta Neuromag system
with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.1.15; Elekta),
MEG data from each subject were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to
noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link); Taulu et al., 2005 ). For motion correction, the position of the head throughout
the recording was aligned to the individual’s head position when the recording was
initiated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MEG Signal Preprocessing and Gradiometer Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As a preliminary step, temporal Signal Space Separation (tSSS) was performed using MaxFilter (Elekta Neuromag) to remove environmental noise from MEG activity. All signals were downsampled to 250 Hz and segmented into trials. ICA was used to remove blink and heartbeat artifacts. An FFT of the data from each subject was inspected for line noise, although none was found in the frequency bands studied here. We note that the frequency of the line noise (50 Hz) was outside of our frequency bands of interest. In the present study, we restricted our analyses to gradiometer sensors. Gradiometers sample from a smaller area than magnetometers, which is important for ensuring a separability of nodes by network models [17 (link)]. Furthermore, gradiometers are typically less susceptible to noise than magnetometers [39 ]. We combined data from 204 planar gradiometers in the voltage domain using the ‘sum’ method from Fieldtrip’s ft_combine_planar() function, resulting in 102 gradiometers (http://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MEG Data Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were acquired using a 306‐channel Elekta Neuromag system located in the Center for Biomedical Technology (Madrid, Spain), using an online anti‐alias filter between 0.1 and 330 Hz and a 1000 Hz sampling rate. Environmental noise was reduced offline using the temporal extension of the signal space separation method,28 using the software Maxfilter (v 2.2 Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), and subject movements were compensated using the same algorithm. We used FieldTrip package29 in MatLab environment, for artifact inspection and removal. Finally, the acquired data were segmented into 4‐s epochs of artifact‐free data. The procedure is extensively detailed in the “supporting information materials and methods”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetoencephalography Data Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were conducted in a one-layer magnetically-shielded room with active shielding engaged. Neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz with an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330 Hz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (v2.2; Elekta), MEG data from each patient were individually corrected for head motion and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link), Taulu et al., 2005 ). Each participant's MEG data were coregistered with structural T1-weighted MRI data prior to source space analyses using BESA MRI (Version 2.0). Structural MRI data were aligned parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures and transformed into standardized space. After beamformer analysis, each subject's functional images were also transformed into standardized space using the transform applied to the structural MRI volume and spatially resampled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Neuromagnetic Response Recordings: A Detailed Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuromagnetic responses were recorded with the helmet-shaped 306-channel sensor array (“Vectorview,” Neuromag Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland). In this study, data from 204 planar gradiometers were used for analyses. Prior to the MEG recording, the positions of HPI coils were digitized together with fiducial points using the 3D digitizer “FASTRAK” (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, United States) and were used to assess a subject’s head position inside the MEG helmet every 4 ​ms. Later, offline position correction procedure was applied to the recorded data to compensate for a head movement.
The spatiotemporal signal space separation method (tSSS) implemented by “MaxFilter” (Elekta Neuromag Oy software) was used to suppress interference signals generated outside the brain. An electrooculogram (EOG) was recorded using four electrodes placed at the outer canthi of the eyes as well as above and below the left eye. The MEG signals were recorded with a band-pass filter of 0.1–330 ​Hz, digitized at 1000 ​Hz, and stored for offline analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Data Processing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With an acquisition bandwidth of 0.1–330.0 Hz, neuromagnetic responses were sampled continuously at 1 kHz using an Elekta MEG system with 306 magnetic sensors (Elekta, Helsinki, Finland). Using MaxFilter (Version 2.2; Elekta), MEG data from each participant were individually corrected for head movement, coregistered with structural MRI, and subjected to noise reduction using the signal space separation method with a temporal extension (tSSS; Taulu & Simola, 2006 (link); Taulu, Simola, & Kajola, 2005 ). Each participant's MEG data were coregistered with structural T1-weighted MRI data before source space analyses using BESA MRI (Version 2.0). Structural MRI data were aligned parallel to the anterior and posterior commissures and transformed into standardized space. After beamformer analysis, each participant's functional images were also transformed into standardized space using the transform previously applied to the structural MRI volume and spatially resampled.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Neuroimaging: Merging MEG and Head Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neuromagnetic activities were recorded with the helmet-shaped 306-channel detector array (“Vectorview,” Neuromag Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland). In this study, data from 204 planar gradiometers were used for analyses.
Prior to the MEG session, the positions of HPI coils were digitized together with fiducial points using the 3D digitizer “FASTRAK” (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, United States) and were used to assess a subject’s head position inside the MEG helmet every 4 ms. Later, offline position correction procedure was applied to the recorded data to compensate for a head movements. The mean change in the MEG sensor locations during the experiment ranged from 3 to 12 mm across subjects. The spatiotemporal signal space separation method (tSSS) implemented by “MaxFilter” (Elekta Neuromag Oy software) was used to suppress interference signals generated outside the brain. An electrooculogram (EOG) was recorded using four electrodes placed at the outer canthi of the eyes as well as above and below the left eye. The MEG signals were recorded with a band-pass filter of 0.1–330 Hz, digitized at 1000 Hz, and stored for offline analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Artifact Removal in MEG Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were pre-processed in two steps. First, magnetic interferences originating outside of the MEG helmet were suppressed by using Signal Space Separation (Taulu and Simola, 2006 (link)) provided by MaxFilter (Elekta-Neuromag Oy; Helsinki, Finland). The median head position of each participant over the three experimental runs was used as reference for the other two runs. In the majority of cases, the second run was the reference run. Second, PCA was performed to remove components accounting for ECG and EOG variance using Graph (Elekta-Neuromag Oy; Helsinki, Finland). The average cardiac and blink artifacts were computed on the basis of ECG and EOG recordings. Components were manually checked for each sensor type (gradiometers and magnetometers) and saved as separate matrices (for detailed procedure, see: Graph">http://www.unicog.org/pm/pmwiki.php/MEG/RemovingArtifactsWithPCAAndGraph).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!