The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bluehill v2

Manufactured by Instron
Sourced in United States

Bluehill V2.0 is a software application designed for materials testing and characterization. It provides a user interface for controlling and operating Instron's testing equipment. The software is capable of data acquisition, analysis, and report generation during materials testing procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

5 protocols using bluehill v2

1

Pelvic Floor Mechanical Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical properties of pelvic floor samples from wild type mice and Loxl1 knockout mice (n = 4 in each groups) were evaluated following the protocol reported by previous studies [22 (link)]. The compressive mechanical properties of the pelvic floor were tested with an Instron testing machine (model 5543; Instron) and software (Bluehill V2.0; Instron), using a 5 mm diameter cylindrical indenter fitted with a 10N maximum loading cell. The unconfined equilibrium modulus was determined by applying a step displacement (20% strain), and monitoring the compressive force over time until equilibrium was reached. The displacement of the cylindrical indenter was tested to estimate strain for applied deformations. The crosshead speed used was 10 mm/min. The ratio of equilibrium force to the cross-sectional area was divided by the applied strain to calculate the equilibrium modulus (in MPa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mechanical Characterization of 3D Gelatin Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mechanical stretch properties of the 3D gelatin scaffold and 3D gelatin scaffold with native or sulfonated SF were tested by using the Instron testing machine (model 5543; Instron, Canton, MA) and software (Bluehill V2.0; Instron). The unconfined equilibrium modulus was also determined by applying a step displacement (20% strain), monitoring the stress in relations with time until equilibrium was reached. Physical thickness of the scaffolds was measured, and the stress-strain relations were evaluated. The crosshead speed used was approximately 0.06 mm/min. The ratio of equilibrium force to cross-sectional area was divided by the applied strain to calculate the equilibrium modulus (in MPa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Hydrogel Compression Mechanical Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogels for mechanical testing were produced as described in section 2.4. After UV crosslinking, the hydrogels were rinsed with PBS and further maintained in PBS for 24 h. The hydrogels were punched using an eight mm biopsy punch prior to mechanical testing. The excess liquid from the hydrogel disks was removed using Kimwipes. Compression testing was carried out by applying a strain rate of 0.2 mm/min using an Instron testing machine (model 5543; Instron, Canton, MA, USA) and software (Bluehill V2.0; Instron). We determined the compressive modulus by taking the slope in the linear section of the stress-strain curve at 5%–10% strain area. Three replicates were used for each hydrogel composition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flexural Behavior Characterization of Polymer Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flexural test was conducted according to ASTM D790 utilizing three-point bending test with Instron Universal Testing Machine (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA, USA), Model No. 5567 (Figure 3). All test specimens were cut in accordance with the procedure specified, with 3 and 15 mm as the average depth and width, respectively, and 48 mm as the effective support span. The total length of the specimens was 110 mm, thereby allowing sufficient overhang on each end to avoid slipping through the supports.
All test specimens were tested at ambient temperature, with a cross-head motion of 12.8 mm/min to obtain 0.1 min−1 strain condition, considering that failure was not observed within 0.05 strain under 0.01 min−1 strain condition. The test was continued until the strain exceeded 0.1. Time, load, and deflection were measured using Blue Hill v2.5 software (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA, USA). The average of three measurements was used for each dimension. The modulus of elasticity, flexural stress, and strain at maximum stress were obtained as the average of five readings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Uniaxial Tensile Testing of Polyurethane Sheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The uniaxial tension test was performed on an Instron Universal Testing Machine (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA, USA), Model No. 5566 under quasi-static condition with displacement-controlled condition in accordance with ASTM D412. Dumbbell test specimens (3 mm thick) were obtained from precast PU sheets in the same direction of the sheet to minimize the influence of anisotropy or grain directionality caused by the flow’s direction during preparation and processing. All dumbbell test specimens (Figure 1) were cut using Die C in accordance with the procedure described in the ASTM specifications. The dimensions were measured by using a vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm, including the average of three measurements used for the dimensions of each specimen.
All test specimens were automatically clamped into the grip. A uniform rate of 50 mm/min was used for grip separation during the test (Figure 2). All test specimens were tested at ambient temperature, and data were measured using Blue Hill v2.5 software (Instron Corporation, Canton, MA, USA). The time, load, and extension data were recorded up to failure, and tensile characteristics were calculated by using obtained data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!