The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dna analyzer

Manufactured by LI COR
Sourced in United Kingdom

The DNA analyzer is a laboratory instrument used for the analysis and detection of DNA samples. It is designed to measure and quantify the presence and characteristics of DNA molecules within a sample. The device utilizes advanced optical detection methods to provide accurate and reliable data on the DNA content, without making any interpretations or assumptions about the intended use of the analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using dna analyzer

1

EMS-Induced Mutations in SlFOLK Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mutations in SlFOLK were identified by screening an EMS-mutagenized tomato population (Just et al., 2013 ) essentially as described in Okabe et al. (2011) (link). TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions In Genomes) unlabeled external primers and internal primers 5′ labeled with IRDye 700 and IRDye 800 dye are listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. Induced point mutations were identified using the mismatch-specific endonuclease ENDO 1. Digested DNA fragments were separated on a Li-Cor DNA analyzer (LI-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). The mutation analysis was performed using PARSESNP (Taylor and Greene, 2003 (link)) and SIFT (Ng and Henikoff, 2003 (link)) software. Homozygous mutant plants were identified by sequencing of the tilled M3 family. Phenotypic characterization was performed in M4 plants homozygous for the folk-1 allele using the corresponding segregating individuals homozygous for the FOLK wild-type allele as control genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AFLP Analyses of Large Plant Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFLP analyses were carried out with the IRDye fluorescent AFLP kit for large plant genome analysis (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). We analyzed 64 AFLP selective primer combinations: EcoRI + AX1X2/MseI + CX3X2 (X1 = A or C; X2 = A, C, G or T; X3 = A or T). The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis through 6% (w v−1) denaturing acrylamide gels in a LI-COR DNA analyzer (LI-COR), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

AFLP Analysis Protocol with Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AFLP analysis was performed as described previously (Vos et al., 1995 (link)), with minor modifications according to Klie et al. (2013) (link). For each sample, 100 ng of DNA was digested with 9 U HindIII (Fisher Scientific – Germany GmbH, Schwerte, D) and 3.5 U MseI (Fisher Scientific - Germany GmbH, Schwerte, D). The preamplification reactions were performed with specific primers that had an A as a selective base at the 3′ end [HindIII (5′-AGACTGCGTACCAGCTT-A-3′) and MseI (5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAGTAA-A-3′)]. HindIII (5′-AGACTGCGTACCAGCTT-ANN-3′) primers with two extra selective bases and MseI (5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAGTAA-ANNN-3′) primers with three extra selective bases were used for the final amplification. The HindIII primers were end-labeled with an infrared dye (either IRD 700 or IRD 800; Eurofins MWG, Ebersberg, D). In a single PCR reaction, labeled primers were used either as single primers or in combinations of two differently labeled primers (IRD 700 and IRD 800). In total, 21 selective primer combinations were analyzed (Table 1). The fragments were separated on 6 % polyacrylamide gels (Sequagel XR, Hessle, UK) using a DNA analyzer (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) and automatically processed using the e-Seq-Software (V3.0, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radish Genotyping Using CEL I Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 180 wild-type radish (‘Comet’) seeds were grown in soil in small pots, and genomic DNA was extracted from the bulked four plants as described above. Each genomic DNA sample was mixed with control wild-type (‘Comet’) genomic DNA and used as template DNA to amplify the PCR products of six target DNAs with specific primers (Supplemental Table 1). After digesting the PCR products with CEL 1, DNA fragments were visualized using a LI-COR DNA Analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microsatellite Marker Development for Chrysanthemum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence information for 7009 ESTs from Chrysanthemum morifolium was downloaded from NCBI (November 2010). These ESTs were screened for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and hepta-nucleotide motifs of microsatellites with a copy number of at least four repeats using the tandem repeat finder (Benson, 1999 (link)). For the 21 SSR-containing ESTs, primer pairs were designed using the Primer3Plus software (Untergasser et al., 2007 (link)) with the default settings. Each forward primer was extended by a universal M13 sequence tag (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) at the 5′ end for IRD-labeling of the PCR fragments (Schuelke, 2000 (link)). The three EST-SSR markers (Table 3) were used on the entire population using the PCR conditions as described previously. The PCR products were separated on 6% polyacrylamide gels (Sequagel XR, Hessle, UK) using a DNA Analyzer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and automatically documented using e-Seq-Software (V3.0, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identifying TOMJPE8986 Alleles via TILLING

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 9,216 EMS-mutagenized lines were screened to identify additional alleles of TOMJPE8986. The screening was performed by TILLING using a LI-COR DNA analyzer according to the procedure described by Okabe et al. (2011) (link). A 1,831 bp region was amplified by PCR using fluorescent DY-681- and DY-781-labelled primers (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!