The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using tof sims 5 instrument

1

ToF-SIMS Imaging of Single Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ToF-SIMS imaging was carried out with a ToF-SIMS 5 instrument (ION-ToF GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a 30 keV liquid metal primary ion source. The high-lateral-resolution (ca. 200–300 nm) images of single cell were recorded using Bi3+ primary ion gun with an electron flood gun for charge neutralization. Imaging signal was collected with 256 × 256 pixels in negative mode after sputtering 5–15 cycles with 10 keV Ar-cluster ion beam to remove the cell membrane and other impurities on the cell surface. The sputter view was larger than the analytical scan view of which the size was the same as that of confocal imaging. Due to the difference among individual cell samples, the scan times of each sample varied from 1000 to 3000 to obtain high quality images. The mass images were collected and plotted with the Surface Lab software (version 6.4 ION-ToF GmbH). The mass were calibrated using the signals of C, CH, CH2, C2, C2H. Region of interest were created for desired cells. The image of cisplatin was constructed by sum of signals of [194PtCN], [195PtCN] and [196PtCN] ions and the image of PO3 was used to profile the shape of cells. Shift correction was applied by the software for all the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ToF-SIMS Surface Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ToF–SIMS measurements were performed using a TOF–SIMS.5 instrument (IONTOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a 30 keV Bi-cluster liquid metal primary ion gun (LMIG) and a 20 keV gas cluster ion beam (GCIB). The latter was used to apply a mild sputter erosion of the sample prior to analysis by applying Ar2000+ clusters at 5 kV with an ion dose density of 1e15/cm2 in a raster field of 200 × 200µm2. For charge compensation, a flood gun was used. In addition, a sample flooding with Ar (1.6e−6 mbar) was applied. All imaging analyses were carried out using Bi3+ primary ions at a cycle time of 100 µs. The field of view was set to approximately 100 × 100 µm2 and the analysis area was scanned in random mode at least 60 times with a pixel number of 256 × 256. Analyses were performed in delayed extraction mode (extraction delay 0.045 µs) resulting in a mass resolution of > 5000 at m/z 86. Data evaluation was performed using Surface.Lab.7.2 (IONTOF GmbH, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Time-of-Flight SIMS Analysis Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ToF-SIMS analyses were performed using a ToF-SIMS 5 instrument (ION-TOF, Münster, Germany) equipped with a bismuth liquid metal ion gun with a kinetic energy of 30 keV. The analyses were performed in an ultra-high vacuum of approximately 10−7 Pa. The SIMS spectra were measured by scanning a Bi3+ cluster ion beam with a diameter of 1 μm over a 100 × 100 μm2 analysis area. The positive secondary ion mass spectra were calibrated using CH2+, CH3+, and C2H5+, and the negative secondary ion mass spectra were calibrated using C, C2, and C3. An electron gun was used for charge compensation on the sample surfaces during the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Anodized Titanium Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological characterization of the
anodized titanium discs
was carried out in a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FSEM)
(Jeol JSM-7600F). The lengths of the nanotubes were estimated from
5 cross-section cuts of the nanotubes of each sample. The structure
of TiO2 films was characterized with X-ray diffraction
(D5000 Bruker AXS diffractometer with Cu–Kα radiation;
λ = 1.5406 Å) and the surface composition was analyzed
with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) on a PHI-TFA XPS spectrometer
(Physical Electronics Inc.) equipped with Al-monochromatic source
of X-rays. Additionally, surface composition was evaluated by time
of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF SIMS). Mass spectra
of positive and negative secondary ions emitted from the surface were
acquired by ToF SIMS 5 instrument (ION TOF) using Bi+ ion
beam of 30 keV for spectra excitation and Cs+ ion beam
at 2 keV for ion sputtering during depth profile analyses. SIMS spectra
were collected during depth profile analyses from the surface to the
depth of 250 nm. Integral of specific fragments in SIMS spectra (F, OH, TiO, O2) were calculated and compared.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry
(ToF-SIMS) was performed using a ToF–SIMS 5 instrument (ION-TOF,
Münster, Germany). A Bi3+ cluster ion
beam with a kinetic energy of 30 keV was used as an analytical beam.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ToF-SIMS Analysis of Surface Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ToF-SIMS analysis was performed using a TOF.SIMS 5 instrument (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany). The instrument is equipped with a 25 keV Bi3+ cluster ion gun as the primary ion source and a 10 keV C60+ ion source for sputtering and etching. The samples were analyzed using a pulsed primary ion beam (Bi3++, 0.34 pA at 50 keV) with a focus of approximately 2 μm at a field of view of 150 µm × 150 µm. The mass resolution using this setup was at least MM = 5000 full width at half maximum at m/z 500. All spectra were acquired and processed with the Surface Lab software (version 6.4, ION-TOF GmbH). Depth profile analysis was performed using a C60++ beam at 20 keV with a current of 0.2 nA in a non-interlaced mode with 1 s of analysis, 1 s of sputtering, and a pause of 1 s for each sputter cycle at 350 µm × 350 µm. The maximum ion dose density of Bi3++ was kept between 4 × 1012 and 7 × 1012 cm−2 over the whole depth profiling experiment, while the ion dose for C60++ ranged from 2 × 1014 to 4 × 1014 ions per cm2. Low-energy electrons were used for charge compensation during analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ToF-SIMS was performed on a TOF.SIMS5 instrument (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a Bi cluster primary ion source and a reflectron type time-of-flight analyzer. UHV base pressure was <5 × 10−9 mbar. For high mass resolution the Bi source was operated in the “high current bunched” mode providing short Bi3+ primary ion pulses at 25 keV energy, a lateral resolution of ~4 μm, and a target current of 0.2 pA at 5 kHz repetition rate. The short pulse length of 0.9 ns allowed for high mass resolution. For depth profiling a dual beam analysis was performed in full interlaced mode: The primary ion source was scanned area of 300 × 300 µm2 (128 × 128 data points) and a sputter gun operated with Ar1650+ cluster ions, 5 keV, scanned over a concentric field of 500 × 500 µm2, (target current 3 nA) was applied to erode the sample. Thereby, the sputter ion dose density was >5000 times higher than the Bi ion dose density. Spectra were calibrated on the omnipresent C, C2, C3, or on the C+, CH+, CH2+, and CH3+ peaks. Based on these datasets the chemical assignments for characteristic fragments were determined. For data visualization, secondary ion intensities were normalized to a maximum of 1.0, each, and plotted over sputter ion fluence [ions/cm2] as an indirect measure for erosion depth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Characterization of Battery Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM with a field emission gun (Schottky‐type) was performed to investigate the surface of the electrodes and the particle size and architecture. The measurements were carried out on multiple areas of the sample using an Auriga CrossBeam workstation from Zeiss (Germany). Cross‐sections were prepared by means of FIB milling using gallium ions generated from a liquid metal ion source. EDX was conducted to examine the elemental composition of the surface and cross‐section on multiple areas of the sample. The measurements were performed with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV using an Ultim® Extreme EDX detector and evaluated with the INCA software, both from Oxford Instruments (United Kingdom). ToF‐SIMS was performed using a TOF.SIMS 5 instrument from ION TOF GmbH (Germany). The nanoscale elemental mapping of the cross‐section was carried out with a liquid metal bismuth ion source (Bi+ 30 keV) in the imaging mode combined with delayed secondary ion extraction. The positive electrodes were analyzed by SEM, EDX, and ToF‐SIMS after washing with 1 mL EMC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

TOF-SIMS Analysis of Surface Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TOF-SIMS analysis was performed with a TOF.SIMS 5 instrument (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a 30 keV liquid metal ion gun. Bi3+ ion clusters were applied as the primary beam, and a low energy electron flood gun was used for charge compensation. For all measurements, the ion dose was kept below 1012 ion/cm2 to ensure static mode conditions, and a 0.5 pA current was applied. High mass resolution TOF-SIMS spectra and maps of positive ions were recorded from ten non-overlapping 100 μm × 100 μm areas of each sample with resolution of 128 × 128 points. Spectra mass calibration was performed based on peaks of H+, H2+, CH+, C2H2+ and C4H5+. The mass resolution (m/Δm) was above 8000 at C4H5+ for all measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Customized Electrochemical Setup for Batch Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A PalmSens2
potentiostat/galvanostat (Palm
Instruments BV, The Netherlands), controlled by PSTrace v.5.6 software,
was used for voltammetric measurements. The experimental setup also
includes a precise (1 rpm resolution) manually controlled stirrer
(Heidolph Schwabach, Germany) in the 0–2000 rpm range and a
Teflon-made customized cell for SPEs, model CFLWCL-CONIC, from Methrom-DropSens
(Oviedo, Spain). The capacity of this novel cell is up to 2.0 mL sample
solution for batch analysis, allowing convenient overhead stirring
and spiking of the solution to perform standard addition methods.
Methrom-DropSens provided disposable LT-SPGEs (ref. 220BT), consisting
of a working electrode (sputtered thin gold film of 4 mm diameter),
a counter electrode (same material as the working electrode), and
a silver pseudoreference electrode, printed on a ceramic surface.
The electrodes were firmly connected to the potentiostat through a
hand-modified crocodile-connector wire, in replacement of the original
sliding connector that we have observed to be very prone to unexpected
disconnections (Figure 1). For surface morphology characterization, we used a scanning electron
microscope FE-SEM Quanta 3D FEG (FEI Company, Oregon, EE.UU.). Qualitative
microanalysis of Au–Hg amalgam by time-of-flight secondary
ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) was carried out using a TOF-SIMS5 instrument (IONTOF, Munster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!