The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

57 protocols using discovery pet ct 690

1

PET/CT Imaging of [18F]FES and [18F]FDG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The production of [18F]FES was described previously [33 (link)]. PET/CT imaging was performed from the skull base to upper thigh using a Discovery PET/CT 690 or 710 scanner (GE Healthcare), 80–100 min after intravenous injection of 111–222 MBq (3–6 mCi) of [18F]FES [31 (link)]. PET/CT images were reconstructed using the manufacturer-provided iterative algorithm with 4 iterations and 18 subsets.
[18F]FDG PET/CT images were obtained from the skull base-to-upper thigh using one of several different PET/CT scanners (Biograph Sensation 16 or Biograph TruePoint 40, Siemens Healthineers; or Discovery PET/CT 690, 690 Elite, or 710, GE Healthcare), 50–70 min after intravenous injection of 5.2–7.4 MBq/kg (0.14–0.2 mCi/kg) of [18F]FDG as described in a previous report [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multi-Modal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI was performed with a 3 tesla Discovery MR 750 scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI), and PET data were acquired with a Discovery PET/CT 690 (General Electric) at both time points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized PET/CT Imaging Protocol for Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging was performed from the skull base to the upper thigh at 50–70 min after intravenous administration of 5.2–7.4 MBq/kg (0.14–0.2 mCi/kg) of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose22 (link). The median blood glucose level before 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose injection was 102 mg/dl (IQR 94–109). Two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to patient outcomes drew a volume of interest on the primary breast cancer or metastatic lymph nodes and assessed the maximum SUV of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. The maximum standardized uptake values were harmonized across various PET/CT scanners (Biograph Sensation 16 and Biograph TruePoint 40, Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA; Discovery STE 8, Discovery PET/CT 690, and Discovery PET/CT 710, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) without partial volume correction23 (link). The recovery coefficient profiles of variable-sized hot cylinders of the American College of Radiology-approved PET phantoms (i.e., Esser phantom) were matched24 (link),25 (link). Annual 18F water cylinder phantom-based cross-calibration between PET and dose calibrator assured the uniform standardized uptake value of 1.0 between PET scanners25 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PET/CT-MRI Multimodal Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the patients underwent a tri-modality PET/CT-MRI (full ring; time-of-flight Discovery PET/CT 690; 3T Discovery MR 750; GE Healthcare) comprising a sequential whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and a regular head and neck MRI. The patients were positioned on a dedicated shuttle board, facilitating their transport from the PET/CT to the MRI system without movement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

FDG-PET/CT and Dental Radiography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Detailed FDG-PET/CT acquisition protocols have been reported previously [14 (link), 15 (link)]. In brief, fasting patients with a blood glucose serum concentration below 12 mmol/l were injected with a standardised dose of 18F-FDG, according to our institution’s protocol. After the injection, the patients rested for one hour in supine position in a warm environment. Scanning was performed using integrated PET/CT systems (Discovery MI PET/CT or Discovery PET/CT 690, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA).
OPTs were generated in a standing position, with the head oriented to the Frankfurt plane, using a Cranex 3D (Soredex, KaVo, Biberach, Germany). Periapical radiographs were generated using a Heliodent DS (Dentsply-Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) intraoral X-ray, operating at 60 kV and 7 mA. The parallel technique was used with a focus-patient distance of approximately 21 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET/CT Acquisition Protocol for Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET/CT acquisitions were performed on a GE Discovery PET/CT 690. The time between injection and imaging was (64 ± 5) min. Images were acquired from head to mid-thigh, with acquisition time 3 min per bed position. Tomographic images were reconstructed with an in-plane matrix size of 192 × 192 and voxel size 3.65 × 3.65 × 3.27 mm3, using time-of-flight information and OS-EM with 3 iterations and 12 subsets, compensation for attenuation and scatter, three-dimensional point-spread function (PSF) modelling (referred to as VPFX-S on the camera system), a transaxial 5 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian post-filter, and an axial z-filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized PET/CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients fasted for at least 6 hours before PET/CT scanning. The plasma glucose level measured before 18F-FDG injection was <150 mg/dL in all patients. 18F-FDG was intravenously administered at a dose of 5.18 MBq/kg (range, 114.3–488.4 MBq); 1 hour after 18F-FDG administration, PET/CT scanning was performed with different systems (Discovery PET/CT 690, 690 Elite, 710; GE Healthcare; Biograph 40 TruePoint PET/CT; Siemens). First, low-dose CT acquisition was performed from the skull base to the upper thigh using the following parameters: 120 kVp, automatic mA, 40 mm collimation, and 3.75 mm thickness for the GE Healthcare machines; 120 kVp, CARE Dose 4D, 28.8 mm collimation, and 5.0 mm thickness for the Siemens machine. A PET scan of the same area was acquired after the CT scan in the 3-dimensional mode with 6 to 7 beds (2 and 2.5 minutes per bed position on the GE Healthcare and Siemens machines, respectively). Images were corrected for attenuation and reconstructed using the 3-dimensional ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) method with time-of-flight (TOF) and point-spread-function (PSF) algorithms (192 × 192 matrix, 4 iterations, 18 subsets, 4 mm postsmoothing on GE Healthcare; 168 × 168 matrix, 3 iterations, 21 subsets, 3 mm postsmoothing on Siemens).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each patient underwent a three-dimensional PET/CT scan from skull base to
mid-thigh approximately 60 min after injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of
18F-FDG. Images were obtained on a PET/CT scanner with
time-of-flight technology (Discovery PET/CT 690; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI,
USA). The PET images were acquired for 3 min per bed position (15-cm slice
thickness with a 3-cm overlap). The iterative technique with 24 subsets was used
for PET image reconstruction in all studies. For attenuation correction and
diagnostic purposes, we obtained non-contrast-enhanced CT transmission scans
using the following parameters: current, 125 mAs; voltage, 120 kVp; gantry
rotation, 0.5 s; pitch, 1.375; and axial slice thickness, 3.75 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

EANM PET/CT Image Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
[18F]FDG-PET/CT image acquisition was performed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines (Boellaard et al. 2014 (link)). Images were acquired 60 ± 5 min after [18F]FDG administration, in the fasting state using an integrated PET/CT scanner, either a Siemens Biograph LS 6 scanner (Siemens, Munich, Germany) equipped with LSO crystals and a six-slice CT scanner, or a GE Discovery PET/CT 690 equipped with LYSO crystals and a 64-slice CT scanner (General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Both scanners are EARL certified (http://www.eanm.org) and images were processed in order to minimize differences between semi-quantitative evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Autopsy-Derived Fontan Conduit Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens were collected at autopsy and consent was obtained to authorize the use of specimens for research purposes. We obtained all de-identified pathological specimens with an extracardiac Fontan PTFE conduit (GORE-TEX®) available within our institution (Nationwide Children’s Hospital; IRB STUDY00003038). These samples were not separately consented for this particular research. The majority of them were collected at the time of autopsy – not surgery. They were collected for non-human subjects research under a general autopsy consent, indicating the following: “I authorize the removal, examination, and retention of specimens including tissue, organs (including the brain), fluids, and devices (“Autopsy specimens”) for diagnostic, education, quality improvement, and or research purposes”. Patient demographics were obtained, gross pathological images were taken, and computed tomography (CT) scans of the entire pathological specimen were acquired with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm, at 450 mA, and 120 kVp using a commercially available clinical scanner (Discovery PET/CT 690, GE Healthcare). After scanning the pathological specimen, a section of the conduit was obtained and Von Kossa staining was carried out. Images were obtained using the Nikon AX R confocal imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!