The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Sweden, Germany

The Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection Kit is a laboratory tool designed to facilitate the visualization and analysis of protein expression in biological samples. The kit provides the necessary reagents and materials to perform chemiluminescent detection, a sensitive technique used to detect and quantify target proteins in Western blot analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

189 protocols using enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit

1

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from the rat myocardial tissues and H9C2 cells using protein lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with a protease inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc). Protein concentration was measured by a BCA kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 40 μg of protein extracts were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Bucks, United Kingdom). After blocking with 5% BSA in 0.5% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C overnight, the membranes were incubated with anti-BRD4 polyclonal antibody (1:500; cat. no. ab75898; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (1:2000; cat. no. ab181602; Abcam), anti-phospho-p85 polyclonal antibody (1:500; cat. no. ab182651; Abcam), anti-P85 polyclonal antibody (1:500; cat. no. 4292; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), anti-AKT 1/2 monoclonal antibody (1:800; cat. no. ab182729; Abcam), anti-AKT (phospho S473) monoclonal antibody (1:400; cat. no. ab81283; Abcam), and anti-AKT (phospho T308) monoclonal antibody (1:400; cat. no. ab38449; Abcam) at 37°C for 2 hours. Membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with secondary antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP; 1:1000; cat. no. ab97051; Abcam) at 37°C for 1 hour, followed by an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was isolated from tissues or cells (48 h after transfection) using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. The protein was separated by the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Afterward, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, and then blocked with 5% skim milk powder at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the PVDF membrane was incubated with the corresponding diluted antibody overnight at 4°C. The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit antibodies to STC1 (1:1000, ab83065, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom); p-JNK (1:1000, ab124956, Abcam); JNK (1:2000, ab208035, Abcam); bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2; 1:1000, ab14933, Abcam). Osteocalcin (1:500, ab93876, Abcam). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; ab9485, 1:2500) was used as a normalization medium. The blot was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody (ab97051, 1:2000, Abcam) for 1 h. Protein bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (No. BB-3501, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Chicago, IL, United States) and Bio-Rad Image analysis system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, United States). Software Quantity One v4.6.2 was used for the further quantifying analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting of Mast Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-DNP IgE (50 ng/ml)–sensitized mBMMCs were pre-treated with or without G.M2 for 1 h and then challenged with DNP-HSA (100 ng/ml) for 5 min (Lyn, Fyn, and Syk) and 15 min (PI3K, PLCγ1, Akt, IKK α/β, IκBα, and p65 NF-κB). Total protein was extracted as described previously (Kim et al., 2018 (link)). Equal amounts of protein were electrophoresed using 7.5–10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was incubated with specific primary antibody followed by anti-IgG horse-radish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immunodetection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Tan I-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from Tan I-treated H28 cells using lysis buffer (Institute de Biologie Structurale-BR002) (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, and protease inhibitor cocktail). The proteins were separated on 10–12.5% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to Hybond ECL transfer nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare Bio-Science). After blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk, the membranes were incubated with the desired primary antibodies [p62 (5114S), LC3II (3868S), poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) (12061), CHOP (2898S), PERK (12185), ATF4 (11815S), ATG5 (FL-25), Beclin-1 (4445), IRE1 (3294), β-Actin (12262) (Cell signaling), and ATF6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc22799)], followed by a horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit (sc2313) or mouse IgG (sc10198). The immune-reactive bands were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular and Secreted Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the treatment, the cells or the medium were obtained. For cellular protein, the cells were lysed in 0.1 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM DTT, 50 mM sodium fluoride and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) for 30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were collected and the concentration of protein was quantified. For protein in the medium was precipitated by 20% TCA for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation for 20 min at 12,000 rpm, the pellets were washed twice by acetone. For Western blot analysis, 30 μg proteins were separated by electrophoresis in a 10% or 14% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane. After 1 h incubation at room temperature in PBS/5% non-fat milk, the membrane was washed with PBS/0.1% Tween 20 for another 1 h and overnight incubated with the indicated antibody at 4°C. After three washings with PBS/0.1% Tween 20, the anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (dilute 1:8000) was applied to the membranes for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed with PBS/0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h. The detection of signal was performed with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and the membranes were scanned using a ChemiDocTM MP Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in ice-cold buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1% triton X-100) containing protease/phosphotase inhibitor cocktails (Sigma-Aldrich). Protein concentration was quantified using the BCA protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with 5% fat-free milk at room temperature for 1 h to block nonspecific binding, and probed with the primary antibodies recognizing cyclin D1, FOXO3, and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA). After washing, the blots were incubated with peroxidase-labeled secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) and developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA). The intensities of the bands were quantified by densitometry using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein detection using chemiluminescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell extracts were prepared by the detergent lysis procedure as described elsewhere (Kim et al., 2009b (link)). Samples of protein (40 µg) were electrophoresed using Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris gel (Life Technolgies, USA), and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for 7 min in the iBlot dry blotting system (Life Technolgies, USA). Immunodetection was done using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction of proteins from mouse colonic mucosa and Western blot analysis were performed as previously described [40 (link),41 (link)]. The primary antibodies used were anti-LC3 (#L8918, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Louis, MO, USA), anti-phospho-H2AX (#2577, Cell Signaling) and anti-α-tubulin (#2144, Cell Signaling). The secondary antibody used was HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (#7074, Cell Signaling). Blots were detected using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection kit (RPN2108, Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) and revealed using the ChemiDocTM XRS System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted from tissues and cells using a modified RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP240, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and 50 mM Tris pH 7.4) in the presence of Complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Western blot analysis was performed after separation of 50 μg of proteins on a SDS/4%–20% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with conventional methods and an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA). After that, filters were probed with rabbit antihuman Paxillin antibody (1:500, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA) and rabbit antihuman GAPDH (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) plus horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated corresponding secondary antibodies at 1:1,000 (Cell Signaling Technologies). The densities of bands were measured using a computer-assisted image analysis system (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and were normalized against the expression level of GAPDH protein. All experiments were performed on three separate times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

VEGFR2 Western Blot Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was carried out for VEGFR2 using an anti-VEGFR2 antibody (Abcam Co.) as the primary antibody. The cells were collected and lysed by RIPA lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA). Total protein was extracted and stored at -80˚C. The extracts were then mixed with 6× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer and boiled for 4 minutes. Samples were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) skim milk in PBS that contained 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 hour at room temperature, washed with PBS, and probed with primary antibodies overnight at 4˚C. Membranes were washed again with PBS and incubated at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Abcam Co., UK) for 1 hour. Proteins were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Bioscience, Buckinghamshire, England). Actin (a goat polyclonal antibody) was used as the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!