The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using pmal c2

1

Bacterial Expression of MPB-FUS Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial expression constructs coding for MPB–FUS KG/KGG were generated by inserting a codon-optimized gBlock double-stranded gene fragment (IDT) replacing all codons for RG/RGG with codons for KG/KGG in the original pMal-Tev-Flag-FUS-Tev-His using Bsu36I and HindIII sites. pMal-Tev-Flag FUS (Δaa1-165)-Tev-His (ΔN) was a gift from Marc-David Ruepp. pMal-c2-MBP-EGFP was generated by PCR amplification of the coding sequence of EGFP and cloning into pMal-c2 (New England Biolabs) via EcoRI and HindIII.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

BoESP Isoforms Cloning and Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to the high sequence similarity of BoESP isoforms, cloning of specific full-length cDNA fragments from B. oleracea was not successful. Therefore, cDNAs were commercially synthesized (Eurofins Genomics Germany GmbH, Germany) and subsequently PCR amplified using the primers listed in Table S2. The resulting fragments were inserted into the pENTR-D/TOPO vector according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) and verified by sequencing. Subsequently, the individual ESP coding regions were recombined into the technique-specific destination vector, using L/R-Clonase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To generate constructs for A. thaliana transformation, the destination vector pRB-35S-3xmyc (Bartetzko et al., 2009 (link)) was used while E. coli expression constructs were based on a Gateway®-compatible version of pMal-C2 (New England Biolabs GmbH, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GAP Domain Protein Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Spin6 GAP domain fragment was cloned into the GST fusion vector pGEX-6p-1 (GE Healthcare). OsRac1 cDNA was cloned into the MBP vector pMAL-c2 (New England BioLabs). The proteins were expressed and purified according to the manufacturer’s protocols for GAP activity assay. OsRac1 protein at 1 μM was loaded with 10 μM mant-GTP (Molecular Probes, M12415) in the following buffer: 20 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. After 10 min at 25°C, the mant-GTP loaded OsRac1 was used for the GAP activity assay by adding 5 μM SPIN6GAP or GST (control) proteins in reaction buffer (200 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA). Samples were immediately placed into a Glo-MAX luminometer (Promega) for fluorescence detection (at 10 min intervals for 30 min) at 25°C. Each reaction was repeated three times, and means and standard errors are presented.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mapping Tctp22 and Brm Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MBP-tagged Tctp22 (link) and GST-tagged Brm fragments (GST::Brm 1-311, 304-747, 748-1638, Δ304-500, Δ574-648, Δ694-747, ΔHSA, ΔBRK, and ΔHSA, ΔBRK) were cloned into pMAL-c2 (NEB) and pGEX5X-1 (GE healthcare), respectively. In-Fusion system (Clontech) was used for cloning. Primer sets used for cloning were listed in Supplementary Table 2. GST-tagged and MBP-tagged proteins were expressed in E.coli Rosetta2 (Novagen, Germany). IPTG (0.1 mM) induction was performed in 14 °C shaking incubator at 250 r.p.m. for 4 h. The extracted proteins were dialysed in TBS buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.0), 150 mM NaCl) containing 20% glycerol and 1 mM DTT and stored at -20 °C before use.
Five micrograms of MBP fusion proteins were used as prey and the same amount of GST fusion proteins as baits. Protein complexes were formed in PDB (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT, proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin for 2–3 h at 4 °C. After washing three times in PDB at RT for 15 min, the samples were boiled in protein loading buffer at 94 °C for 5 min and loaded for western blotting. Primary antibodies were as follows: Ms anti-GST (1:4,000, SantaCruz sc-138) and Rb anti-MBP (1:10,000, NEB E8030S).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Examining TbPex3-TbPex19 Binding Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Binding between TbPex3 and TbPex19 was examined essentially as described (Knoblach et al, 2013 (link)). GST fusion to TbPex19 was constructed in pGEX4T-1 (GE Healthcare). MBP fusions to TbPex3 and to mutants TbPex3-F102A and TbPex3-L105A were constructed in pMAL-c2 (New England Biolabs). Recombinant proteins were expressed in the Escherichia coli strain BL21 (Invitrogen). GST alone or GST-TbPex19 was immobilized on glutathione-sepharose beads and incubated with E. coli lysates containing MBP-TbPex3 or MBP-TbPex3-F102A or MBP-TbPex3-L105A in binding buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% (vol/vol) Triton X-100). Unbound proteins were removed by washing five times in binding buffer. Immobilized proteins were eluted in sample buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 0.002% bromophenol blue, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) and subjected to SDS–PAGE and immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of MBP- and GST-tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasmids pMAL-C2-AtYchF1 and pGex-4T-1-AtGAP1 and their corresponding empty-vector control plasmids (pMAL-C2: New England Biolabs Inc., Beverly, MA, United States; pGex-4T-1: GE28-9545-49, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, England) were transformed into the E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain. Protein expression was induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) in the growth medium (LB) with 100 mg L−1 ampicillin with shaking at 20°C overnight. SpinCleanTM MBP Excellose® spin kit (Cat# 23020, Mbiotech, Haman, Korea) and MagneGST™ Protein Purification System (Cat# V8600, Promega, CA, United States) were then used to purify the expressed MBP- and GST-tagged proteins according to the user manuals, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Affinity Purification and DNA-Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ORF of GhHOX3 and GhHD1, in frame, was fused to the maltose-binding protein tag of the expression vector pMAL-C2 (New England Biolabs), and the recombinant proteins were affinity purified following the manufacturer’s manual. The ORF of GhSLR1 and the yellow fluorescence protein gene were in frame fused to the glutathione S-transferase tag of the expression vector pGEX-4T-1 (GE Healthcare), respectively, and the recombinant proteins were affinity-purified using Glutathione Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare) following the manufacturer’s manual. The 6 × promoter segments of GhRDL1 and GhEXPA1, containing the intact or mutated L1-box cis-element, were labelled with Cy5 on both ends. The assay was performed by incubation of the DNA fragment with the purified protein at 25 °C for 30 min, separated with 5% native PAGE in 0.5 × TBE (Tris/Borate/EDTA) buffer (10 V cm−1, 4 °C). Fluorescence was observed with an image scanner (FLA-9000, FUJIFILM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HsMar1 Excision and Transposase Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The whole HsMar1 excision cassette (Fig. 1a) and the HSMAR-RA ORF ([19 (link)]) were synthetized by Eurofins and cloned in pBluescript KS+. The plasmid containing the HsMar1 cassette is named pHsMar1. The mPB plasmid, expressing PiggyBac transposase, was obtained from the Welcome trust Sanger institute ([39 (link)]).
HSMAR-RA ORF was cloned in fusion with Maltose Binding Protein (MBP) in pMalc2 (New England Biolabs). The resulting fusion MBP-HSMAR-RA and HSMAR-RA were cloned in pCS2 plasmid. After PCR amplification, CRE ORF was cloned in pCS2.
All constructs were controlled by sequencing (Eurofins MWG Biotech). DNA preparations to be transfected were performed with Nucleobond Xtra EF kit (Macherey-Nagel).
Genomic DNAs needed for analyses were extracted and purified with Nucleospin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel).
PCR primers used in the study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 and were purchased by Eurofins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Recombinant Histidine-Tagged QPO Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A DNA fragment was synthesized to encode QPO with an N-terminal 6x-Histidine tag and 5ʹ EcoRI and 3ʹ BamHI restriction sites (Integrated DNA Technologies). The 6x-His QPO DNA fragment was cloned into the pCR2.1 cloning plasmid (Invitrogen), sequenced for accuracy (Iowa State University, Office of Biotechnology), and subsequently cloned into pMal-c2 (New England Biolabs) using EcoRI and BamHI. The resulting plasmid was transformed into T7 Express Competent E. coli (New England Biolabs). Transformants were cultured in LB + ampicillin (50 µg/mL) and induced for expression with 0.4 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), resulting in a Maltose Binding Protein (MBP)/6x-His QPO fusion protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Heterologous Expression and Purification of ChpG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 112–831 bp fragments containing the ChpG open reading frame minus its signal peptide‐coding region (predicted by SignalP‐5.0 Server; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) were amplified from pHN216:ChpG and pHN216:ChpGS231A, cloned into pMALc2× (NEB) and plasmids were introduced into E. coli Rosetta (Merck). Bacterial cultures were grown in an orbital shaker at 37°C to OD600 = 0.4–0.6, supplemented with 0.1 mM isopropyl β‐d‐1‐thiogalactopyranoside, and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Bacteria were pelleted and resuspended in ice‐cold buffer solution (20 mM Tris‐HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and lysed using a SONIC‐150W ultrasonic processor (MRC Labs). MBP‐fused proteins were purified from supernatants using amylose resin (NEB) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purified proteins were quantified by Bradford protein assay kit (Bio‐Rad) and validated by SDS‐PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue (Sambrook & Russell, 2006 ). Protein accumulation in total bacterial extracts and in the purified fractions was confirmed with western blot using anti‐MBP tag (8G1) mouse monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Figure S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!