The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using cd3 efluor450

1

Hcp1 Binding Assay for PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from peripheral blood by Ficoll gradient. U937, RAW 264.7 cells or PBMCs were incubated with Hcp1 (10 μg of protein per 5 × 105 cells) for an hour or overnight with rotation at 37°C. Coated cells were washed in PBS and stained with anti-Hcp antibody (clone 56-1) at the dilution of 1:100, followed by goat anti-mouse AF647 at the dilution of 1:200. PBMCs were further stained with antibodies against either CD19-PE/CD20-FITC, CD14-PE, CD16-PE/CD56-APC, or CD3-eFluor®450 (eBioscience)/CD4-PE/CD8-FITC. Stainings were done at 4°C for 30 min, and cells were fixed with 1% PFA. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry on a BD Fortessa FACS Scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analyses of Cell Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric analyses were performed using either fluorescently labeled or unlabeled mAbs followed by species-specific PE conjugates. Murine anti-human CD133 mAbs 293C3, AC133 and W6B3C1 were purchased from Miltenyi Biotec (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). CD69-PE and CD107a-PE were from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA), CD56-APC and CD14-PE/Cy7 from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA) and CD3-eFluor450 from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). The goat anti-mouse PE conjugate was obtained from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark), the donkey anti-human PE conjugate was from Jackson ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA, USA). The corresponding isotype controls were from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). Dead cells were excluded from analysis by 7-AAD (BioLegend; San Diego, CA, USA). Analysis was conducted using a FACS Canto II or FACS Fortessa (both BD Biosciences; Heidelberg, Germany). Specific fluorescence intensity (SFI) levels were calculated by dividing mean fluorescences obtained with a specific mAb by mean fluorescences obtained with the respective isotype control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Splenocyte Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Splenocytes were isolated from naïve mice, and from mice that had received Balb/c allografts from 4 groups; 1. B6 recipient, no treatment, 2. B6 recipient, treatment with 3mg/kg/day CsA, 3. B6 recipient, treatment with CR2-Crry, and 4. B6 recipient, treatment with CR2-Crry + 3mg/kg/day CsA. Spleens were isolated 7 days posttransplant. Isolated spleens were mechanical disrupted, suspensions passed through a series of nylon mesh strainers, and frozen in freezing media (Invitrogen) for later analysis. Splenocytes were thawed and stained for cell surface markers (CD3 eFluor450, CXCR3 FITC; eBioscience; CD4 APC Cy7, CD8 APC, CD44 PerCP Cy5.5, CD62L FITC, FoxP3 PE, BD Biosciences) and incubated in FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FBS) in the dark for 20 minutes at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice in FACS buffer and incubated in Fixation Buffer (BioLegend) for 10 minutes. After washing with FACS buffer, cells were run on a BDVerse (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Analysis of Skin-Resident Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1cm2 skin pieces from unmanipulated or tape stripped mice, were obtained. Skin pieces were finely chopped using scissors after fat removal and digested for 90 minutes in the media containing Liberase (0.2mg/mlRoche) and DNAse II (Sigma), with continuous shaking at 37° C. Digested skin homogenates were filtered, washed and resuspended in PBS and used for flow cytometry. Cells were preincubated with FcγR-specific blocking mAb (2.4G2) and washed before staining with the following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): APC-anti-CD45, BV605-anti-CD11b (Biolegend), FITC-anti-Gr1 (Biolegend), Percpcy5.5 γδ TCR (ebioscience), CD3 efluor-450 (ebioscience). Cells were analyzed on LSR Fortessa (BD Biosciences), and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Lymphocyte Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For children a 100 μl volume of whole blood for each donor was stained with antibodies to the following surface markers: CD3 PE, CD4 PErCP, (BD Biosciences), CD8 efluor450 and CD27 APCalexafluor750 (Ebioscience) for 30 min at 4°C. Red blood cells were then lysed using 1:10 FACS Lysing Solution (BD Biosciences) and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice in FACS buffer (PBS, 5% BSA, 5% EDTA) and re-suspended in Cytofix (BD, Biosciences). Samples were acquired on a Cyan ADP flow cytometer using Summit software (Beckman Coulter) at MRC Gambia.
Lymphocyte subsets from AIM patients were identified by staining with antibodies specific to: CD19 FITC, CD4 PE (Biolegend), CD27 APC elfluor 780, CD3 efluor 450 (eBioscience) and CD8 qDot 655 (Invitrogen). Samples were stained for 30 min on ice, washed and analysed immediately on an LSR-II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data was analysed using Flow-Jo software (Treestar Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

OVA-specific T cell expansion quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two days prior to mRNA immunization, 2 × 106 OT-I or OT-II cells were purified and labeled with 5 µM of CFSE (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) and subsequently adoptively transferred via i.v. injection into mice that had been s.c. inoculated with B16 cells. Four days after the mRNA treatment, draining lymph nodes were isolated and OT-I or OT-II cell division was analyzed by flow cytometry. Cells were stained with anti-CD16/CD32 (500× dilution) (BD Biosciences) to block Fc receptors followed by staining with Fixable Viability Dye (1000× dilution) (BD Biosciences), CD8 PE-Cy7 (200× dilution) (eBiosciences), CD3 efluor450 (200× dilution) (eBioscience), anti-CD19 allophycocyanin (APC; 200× dilution) (BD Biosciences), and MHC-I dextramer H-2 Kb/SINFEKL-PE (500× dilution) (Immundex). The experiments were performed on a triple-laser (B-V-R) LSR-II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Treestar, OR). Single cells were gated based on FSC and SSC. Living cells were selected and T cells gated for CD3+ CD19 T cells. Within the CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells, OVA-specificity was gated by labeling with MHC-I SINFEKL-PE dextramer. See Supplementary Fig. 4 for the gating strategy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation of Muscle Stem Cells and Progenitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hind limb muscles from C57/BL6 wild type mice (Charles River Laboratories) were minced and digested in PBS (Sigma) containing 0.1% BSA, 300 µg/ml Collagenase A (Roche), 0.24 U/ml Dispase I (Roche), 2 μg/ml DNase I (Roche), 50 μM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 for 60 min at 37 °C under constant agitation. For fluorescence-activated cell sorting, digested muscle cells were stained with primary antibodies (1:50) CD3-eFluor450 (eBioscience), CD45-eFluor450 (eBioscience), Ter119-eFluor450 (eBioscience), Sca-1-FITC (BD Pharmingen), and α7integrin-APC (AbLab) for 30 min at RT. Cells were finally washed and resuspended in Running Buffer (PBS, 0.1% Sodium Azide, 0.2% FBS). Flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting were performed on a DAKO-Cytomation MoFlo High Speed Sorter.
Muscle satellite cells (SCs) were isolated as Ter119−/CD45−/CD31−/α7-integrin+/Sca-1− cells. Fibro-adipogenic progenitors (FAPs cells) were isolated as Ter119−/CD45−/CD31−/α7-integrin−/Sca-1+ cells, as previously described44 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Immunoprofiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following anti-mouse mAbs were used for surface staining during flow cytometry: CD3-eFluor 450, CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD11b-AlexaFluor 700, CD11b-eFluor 450, CD14-FITC, CD25-APC, CD25-eFluor 450, CD45.1-APC, Ly6C-APC-eFluor 780, I-A/E-FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), CD45.1-eFluor 450, CD45R-Horizont V500, CD3-Horizont V500, CD4-Horizont V500, CD4-PerCP, CD8-Horizont V500, Ly6G-AlexaFluor 700, Siglec F-PE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA) and TLR4-APC (BioLegend, San Diego, Ca, USA). For intracellular staining, the following anti-mouse mAbs were used: TNFα-PE, Foxp3- and IFNγ-PE (eBioscience; San Diego, California, USA). Fc-block (anti-CD16/CD32 mAbs; eBioscience, San Diego, California, USA) was used both in surface and intracellular staining. For ELISA, matched anti-mouse capture mAb and biotinylated detection mAb against TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12 and IL-6 were used (R&D System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA). Blocking anti-mouse CD25 (PC61.5), CD4 (GK1.5) and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2) mAbs, as well as anti-mIL-2 mAbs for preparing IL-2 complexes (S4B6, JES6-1A12), were obtained from BioXcell (Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Immune Profiling of CT26 Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT26 tumors were digested using a gentleMACS dissociator and a murine tumor dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Absolute viable cell counts were determined by propidium iodide staining and analysed on the MACSQuant analyzer. Cells from CT26 tumors and splenocytes were stained with fixable LIVE/DEAD blue (Life Technologies) and incubated with anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (eBioscience) prior to addition of anti-mouse: CD8-Pe-Cy7 (clone 53–6.7); CD3-eFluor 450 (clone 17A2); CD11c-PE (clone N418); CD86-FITC (clone GL1); PDCA1-APC (clone 129c) (eBioscience); PD-L1-BV421 (clone 10F.9G2); I-A/I-E (MHCII) (clone M5/114.15.2); B220-BV605 (clone RA3-6B2) (Biolegend); CD45-BV785 (clone 30F11); CD4-BUV395 (clone GK1.5); CD11b-BUV395 (clone M1/70); Ly6G-APC-Cy7 (clone 1A8); Ly6C-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone AL-21) (BD Biosciences). For intracellular staining, cells were permeabilized using Foxp3 / Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) and incubated with anti-mouse Foxp3-PE (clone FJK-16S) and Ki67-eFluor 660 (clone SolA15) (eBioscience). Stained cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde and analyzed using a BD LSRFortessa (BD Bioscience). Data analysis was performed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC). 8 mice per treatment group were included in all flow cytometry analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Gut Immune Responses in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains (5 × 108 CFU/day/mice) were administered by intragastric gavage to WT conventional BALB/c mice for 5 days. Colon samples were removed at sacrifice and stored in RNAlater® storage solution (Ambion, Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) at − 80 °C until qRT-PCR analysis. MLN and intestine were harvested and immediately processed for flow cytometry. Cell suspensions of MLN and intestine (3–5 × 106 cells, in RPMI1640 supplemented by 10% FCS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 2 mM HEPES, 40 mg/ml gentamycine) were stimulated using the Leukocyte Activation Cocktail containing BD GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences) (1 μl/ml of cell suspension) for 5 h. Cells were stained by mAbs anti-mouse CD11c eFluor450, CD11b eFluor 450, B220 eFluor 450, CD3 eFluor 450, CD117 Alexa Fluor 700, NK1.1 PerCP-Cy5.5, NKp46 FITC (provided by eBioscience), CD4 APC-H7, CD90.2 BV 500; CD45RB BV 605, MHCII BV 650 (provided by BD Bioscience, san Jose, CA, USA). Subsequently, cells were permeabilized and fixed using the Transcription Factor Buffer Set (BD Bioscience), and intracellular staining was performed using mAbs anti-IL-17A eFluor450, anti-FOXP3 PE-Cy7, anti-IL-22 PE and RORgt APC (eBioscience). Flow cytometry data were analyzed using software FlowJo. Gating strategy and representative dot plots for control and BIO5768 treated mice are presented in Figs. S1 and S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!