The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using hq silver

1

Pre-embedding Immuno-EM of GLAST Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For pre-embedding immuno-electron microscopy, GLAST-mGC3 and GLAST-mGC3;IP3R2−/− mice (16–17 weeks old) were transcardially perfused with 4 % paraformaldehyde/0.1 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) under deep pentobarbital anesthesia. Brains, still within the skull, were postfixed in the same fixative solution for 4 h at 4° C. After post-fixation, brains were isolated and stored in 0.1 M PB with 0.05 % sodium azide at 4° C until further processed. After blocking with 5 % normal donkey serum in PBS, coronal sections (60 μm in thickness) were incubated overnight with rabbit anti-EGFP IgG (Frontier Institute) and then with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to 1.4 nm gold particles (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following silver enhancement (HQ silver, Nanoprobes), sections were osmificated, dehydrated and embedded in Epon 812 resin. Ultrathin sections (70 nm in thickness) were prepared with an ultramicrotome (Leica Ultracut UCT) and stained with 2 % uranyl acetate and 1 % lead citrate. Electron micrographs were taken with an H-7600 electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Fixation and Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals were purchased from EMSdiasum (Hatfield, PA, USA): 32% (v/v) paraformaldehyde (formaldehyde) aqueous solution (# 15714-S); glutaraldehyde (#16210), osmium tetroxide (OsO4; #19100), epoxy resins (#14120 Embed 812, an Epon substitute), UranyLess™ staining solution (#22409), uranyl acetate (UA; #22400; note: uranyl compounds are radioactive, thus, subject to specific safety regulations as to purchase, handling, disposal); from Sigma-Aldrich: periodic acid (PA; #10450-60-9), thiosemicarbazide (TCH; #79-19-6), silver proteinate (SP; #9008-42-8), lead citrate (#15326), methyl cellulose (#M7027), paraformaldehyde powder (#158127), phosphate buffer solution (0.1 M; #5244); or from other sources (i.e., gelatin, sucrose both from food store), HQ-Silver® (#2012, from Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunodetection of VGLUT3 in Hippocampus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VGLUT3 was detected with an electron microscope with a post-embedding immunogold method as previously described (Gras et al., 2002 (link), 2008 (link)). Sagittal brain sections of the hippocampus were incubated with guinea pig anti-VGLUT3 antiserum (1:1000). Immunolabeling was detected with goat anti-guinea pig IgGs conjugated to gold particles (1.4 nm in diameter; Nanoprobes, NY, USA, 1:100). After post-fixation (1% glutaraldehyde), the immunogold signal was enhanced with a silver enhancement kit (HQ silver, Nanoprobes; NY, USA). Ultrathin sections were examined with a transmission electron microscope (EM 912 OMEGA, ZEISS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Labeling of M1 Receptor and KCNQ Channels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoperoxidase labeling, sections were incubated for 72 h at 4˚C with the M1 receptor antibody or KCNQ5 antibody in TBS with 1% NGS, and transferred for 2 h at room temperature to species-specific biotinylated F(ab’)2 fragments in TBS, and finally to avidin-biotinylated peroxidase (1:200 in TBS; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, United States of America) for 2 h at room temperature. Peroxidase activity was visualized in 0.025% diaminobenzidine (DAB) in TB with the addition of 0.005% hydrogen peroxide for 8–12 min. The omission of the primary antibody or substitution with non-immune serum abolished all reactivity.
For immunogold labeling, KCNQ2, KCNQ3 and KCNQ5 antibodies were diluted in TBS with 2% NGS (N-TBS), and applied for 36 h at 4°C. Sections were washed in N-TBS supplemented with 0.07% Tween 20 and 0.1% BSA-c gold-buffer, and incubated for 2 h at RT with species-specific Fab’ conjugated to 1.4 nm gold cluster (1:200; Nanoprobes). Following fixation in buffered glutaraldehyde in PB, gold was enhanced under a mercury-vapor safelight for 8–10 min on ice with a silver autometallographic developer (HQ Silver; Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY, United States of America). The peroxidase and gold immunoprocedures have been described in detail previously (Jin et al., 2017 (link); Paspalas et al., 2018 (link); Paspalas et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pre-embedding Immunogold Labeling of BDNF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty micro meter vibratome sections from WT and Bsn-mutants were processed for pre-embedding immunogold labeling as previously described (Dieni et al., 2012 (link)). Briefly, sections were snap frozen to increase antigenicity, blocked in 3% M.O.M. and incubated in anti-BDNF (20 μg/ml) for three nights at 4°C. After thorough washing with 50 mM TBS, sections were treated overnight at 4°C with 1.4 nm gold-conjugated mouse IgG (1:100). Bound gold particles were enhanced using a silver intensification kit (HQ Silver; Nanoprobes) and sections were then fixed for 10 min in 1% GA solution. Sections underwent osmification (0.5% OsO4 and 6.86% sucrose in 0.1 M PB) for 40 min, were treated with 1% uranyl acetate in 70% ethanol (EtOH) for 35 min, and dehydrated in increasing grades of EtOH. After washing in propylene oxide, the tissue was embedded in Durcupan (Fluka). Ultrathin sections (60 nm) of CA3 were cut and mounted on formvar-coated copper grids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exosome Immunogold Labeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 overnight and 20 µl of suspended exosome preparation was applied to a carbon-formvar coated 200 mesh nickel grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and allowed to stand 30 min. Excess sample was wicked off onto Whatman filter paper. Grids were then floated exosome side down on 20 µl drops of 1 M ammonium chloride for 30 min to quench aldehyde groups from the fixation step, followed by flotation on drops of blocking buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 1 h. After three rinses in PBS, grids were incubated for 1 h on drops of 1.4 nm anti-rabbit nanogold (Nanoprobes, Inc.) diluted 1:1000 in blocking buffer, then washed in PBS three times, for 5 min each wash, followed by three washes in deionized H2O. Nanogold was enhanced for 8 min in HQ Silver, (Nanoprobes, Inc.) and rinsed in ice cold deionized H2O to terminate enhancement. Grids were then negatively stained in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and allowed to air dry before being imaged in a JEM 1400Flash transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA Inc.) at 120 kV with a Gatan One View Digital Camera (Gatan Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunogold Labeling of Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunogold labelling was performed as described15 (link) with some modifications. PA chromosomes were dropped onto an aluminum foil substrates and treated with 0.5% triton X-100 in XBE2 (10 mM HEPES pH 7.7, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2) for 10 min. Chromosomes were then blocked in 1% BSA in XBE2 for 30 min and incubated with Topo IIα antibody (1:50; Topogen) or hCAP-E (1:100) for 1 h. After washing, chromosomes were incubated with anti-mouse FluoroNanogold®or anti-rabbit FluoroNanogold® (1:200; Nanoprobes) for 1 h. The chromosomes were post-fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in XBE5 (10 mM HEPES pH 7.7, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2). After washing, samples were silver-enhanced (HQ silver, Nanoprobes). The immunogold-labelled chromosomes were then treated with 2% osmium tetroxide and extensively washed with ultrapure water. Sample dehydration was carried out using an ethanol series (70%, 100% and 100%) and then treatment with 3-methylbutyl acetate and critical point drying, after which osmium coating was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Plant Root Tips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ultrastructural analysis, root tips were high-pressure frozen (Bal-Tec HPM010; Balzers) in hexadecene (Merck Sharp and Dohme, Haar, Germany), freeze-substituted in acetone containing 2.5% osmium tetroxide, washed at 0°C with acetone, and embedded in Epon. For immunogold labeling of ultrathin thawed cryosections, root tips were fixed with 8% formaldehyde (2 hr), embedded in gelatin, and infiltrated with 2.1 M sucrose in PBS as previously described (Dettmer et al., 2006 (link)). Thawed ultrathin sections were labeled with rabbit anti-GFP antibodies (1:300; Abcam) and silver-enhanced (HQ Silver, 8 min; Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY, USA) goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Nanogold (no. 2004; Nanoprobes). Antibodies and markers were diluted in blocking buffer (PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 1% milk powder).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Chlamydia CPAF Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were seeded in 24 well plates onto coverslips and infected with C. trachomatis L2 for 30 h. The cells were fixed in 4% PFA/0, 1% glutaraldehyde (EM grade, Roth) for 20 minutes and stained over night with the mouse anti-CPAF antibody (1∶50) in 50 mM TBS/2% normal goat serum, washed with 50 mM TBS and stained over night with a gold-coupled anti-mouse antibody (1∶100, Nanoprobes). After silver intensification (HQ silver, Nanoprobes) and counterstain with 0.1% osmium tetroxide (Roth), samples were embedded in Durcupan (Fluka), subjected to ultra-thin-sectioning and analyzed with a Zeiss Leo TEM. Quantification of immunogold labeling was performed using ITEM software (Olympus, Germany). Briefly, pictures of infected cells were randomly taken, the regions of interest (inclusions or cytoplasm) were outlined and the number of gold particles was counted within these regions. Non infected, stained cells of the same culture dishes were taken as negative control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunolocalization of APPL1 in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells in 3 cm dishes were fixed in PBS containing 1% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde and 0.01% digitonin for 15 min at RT and then with 1% PFA in PBS for further 15 min. They were then washed and incubated with 50 mM glycine in PBS for 5 min and then with blocking solution (1% BSA, 0.1% digitonin, and 50 mM glycine in PBS) before incubation with rabbit anti-APPL1 diluted 1:100 in 0.2% BSA, 0.1% fish skin gelatin for 60 min at RT. After washing (6 × 10 min with PBS) cells were incubated with 1.4 nm goat anti-rabbit Nanogold (Nanoprobes) for 2 h at RT. After fixation for 5 min with 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, cells were washed sequentially with PBS and then distilled water (3 × 5 min) before silver enhancement for 3 min at RT in the dark according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanoprobes HQ Silver). Cells were further processed following standard procedures and flat embedded in epon resin. Sections were cut parallel to the culture substratum and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before viewing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!