The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sunfiretm c18 column

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The SunFireTM C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. The column features a silica-based stationary phase with C18 functionality, providing effective retention and separation of both polar and non-polar analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

24 protocols using sunfiretm c18 column

1

Comprehensive HPLC and HSCCC Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of HPLC products was carried out on a Waters 2695 coupled with a Waters 2998 Diode array detector, analysis SunFireTMC18 Column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, id 5 μm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) and Sigma 1–14 centrifuge (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) with ultramembrane filters (Microcon YM-30; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A semi−preparative HPLC was performed using a 2545 Quaternary Gradient Module pump, a Fraction Collector III, a Waters 2489 UV/Vis detector, and a semi−prep SunFireTMC18 Column (100 × 19 mm, ID 5 μm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). HSCCC was performed on a DE Spectrum HSCCC (Dynamic Extractions, Slough, UK). The kinetics of enzymatic reactions were managed using a High Performance Capillary Electrophoresis apparatus (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

NMR Spectroscopy and Chromatographic Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 500 MHz spectrometer operating at 500.13 MHz for 1H. A 1-mm TXI microprobe with a z-gradient was used for 1H-detected experiments. Spectra were analyzed using Bruker Topspin 3.0 software. CDCl3 for NMR were purchased from Armar Chemicals. Solvents used for extraction, column chromatography and HPLC were of technical grade and were purified by distillation. Silica gel (70–230 mesh) was used for column chromatography and percolated silica gel F254 (20*20 cm) plates for TLC (both Merck). Detection was at 254 and 366 nm or by spraying with phosphor molybdic acid reagent and subsequently heating (120°C for 5 min). Analytical RP-HPLC using a SunFireTM C18 column (3.5 μM, 10 mm × 150 mm; Waters) equipped with a pre-column (3 × 10 mm) was used for analytical evaluations. Semi preparative RP-HPLC using a SunFireTM C18 column (5.0 μM, 10 mm × 150 mm; Waters) equipped with a pre-column (5.0 × 10 mm) was also used for the isolation process. Antifungal compounds were purchased from HiMedia (Mombay, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise described, all commercial reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All reactions were performed under N2 atmosphere in flame-dried glassware. Reactions were monitored by TLC with 0.25 mm E. Merck precoated silica gel plates (60 F254). Reaction progress was monitored by TLC analysis using a UV lamp, ninhydrin, or p-anisaldehyde stain for detection purposes. All solvents were purified by standard techniques. Purification of reaction products was carried out by silica gel column chromatography using Kieselgel 60 Art. 9385 (230 − 400 mesh). The purities of all compounds were shown to be over 95% by using Waters LCMS system (Waters 2998 photodiode array detector, a Waters 3100 mass detector, a Waters SFO system fluidics organiser, a Water 2545 binary gradient module, a Waters reagent manager and a Waters 2767 sample manager) using a SunFireTM C18 column (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 5 µm particle size): solvent gradient = 60% (or 95%) A at 0 min, 1% A at 5 min. Solvent A = 0.035% TFA in H2O; solvent B = 0.035% TFA in MeOH; flow rate 3.0 (or 2.5) mL/min. 1H and 13 C NMR spectra were obtained by using a Bruker 400 MHz FT-NMR (400 MHz for 1H, and 100 MHz for 13 C) spectrometer. Standard abbreviations are used for denoting the signal multiplicities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system was comprised of a Waters e2695 HPLC system equipped with a Waters SunFireTM C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) as well as a Diode Array Detector (DAD, Waters 2998, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution (v/v, solution A) and acetonitrile solution (solution B) in the gradient elution at 0.8 mL/min with time-course increasing of solution B to 15% B for 0–5 min, 15–20% B for 5–10 min, 20–25% B for 10–20 min, 25–35% B for 20–30 min, 35–50% B for 30–40 min, 80% B for 40–50 min, and 15% B for 50–55 min. The column temperature was set at 30 °C. The detected wavelength was set at 280 nm. Before HPLC analysis, the samples were filtered through a 0.25-μm membrane filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Accurate amounts of standard phenolics were added to GL extracts after enzymatic hydrolysis, and they were extracted as described in Section 4.3, Section 4.4 and Section 4.5. As calculated according to the amount found and amount added, the recovery rate of these phenolics ranged from 95.31% to 101.07% (Table 3). The contents of individual phenolics were expressed as milligram per 100 g DM of GL samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis was performed using an Alliance e2695 system (Waters, Milford, MA, United States) equipped with an autosampler and photodiode array detector (DAD, Waters 2998) and a SunfireTM C18 column, 5 μm (4.6 × 150 mm) (Waters®) attached to a guard column (SunfireTM C18, 5 μm, 4.6 × 20 mm, Waters®). The mobile phase consisted of a gradient of H2O (A):CH3CN (B) with a flux rate of 2 mL/min for 60 min (5%–100% B) and a UV detection wavelength of 210–600 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 900 µL aliquot from the elicited culture medium was extracted with an equal amount of ethyl acetate in a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube by vortexing for 30 s. Then, 500 µL of the upper organic phase was removed, transferred to an amber HPLC vial, and dried under a nitrogen stream using a Reacti-Vap III apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). HPLC analyses were performed in an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extract was resuspended in 500 µL of MeOH and analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC. Briefly, the chromatography was performed in a SunFireTM C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm, UV detection at 340 nm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The mobile phase was composed of MeOH (A) and 0.5% HCO2H (v/v) (B). The column was initially calibrated with B for 1 min. Then, a linear gradient was performed using the following program: 60% A to 65% A for 1–20 min, 65% A and 35% B to 100% B for 20–25 min, and 100% B for 25–30 min. Calibration curves for reference compounds were established previously [36 (link)]. Similarly, re-elicited culture medium was extracted and analyzed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Nucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh-frozen tissues were washed once with PBS, and homogenized in 10% Trichloroacetic Acid (T6399, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubating on ice for 10 min, the mixtures were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the nucleotide containing supernatant was washed 4 times with water-saturated diethyl ether. Then the supernatant was froze at −80 °C, and freeze-dried at −20 °C overnight use FreeZone Freeze Dry Systems (LABCONCO, Inc., MO, USA). The extracted nucleotides were dissolved in 100 μL ultrapure water and centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 5 min. Supernatant was filtered with 0.45 μm filter and then analyzed by HPLC on a Agilent 1260 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., CA, USA) equipped with a Waters SunFireTM C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and detected by UV-VIS absorbance at 260 nm. The nucleotides were eluted with isocratic elution (flow rate: 0.75 ml/min, Column temperature: 25 °C) using a mixture of 10% acetonitrile and 90% water (0. 01 mol/L Tetrabutylammonium bromide, 0.05 mol/L Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4, pH6.4). The amount of each nucleotide was determined by external standard method. The following standards were used: ATP (A2383), ADP (A2754), AMP (01930), IMP (57510), GMP (G8377), GDP(G7127), GTP(G8877) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prunasin Quantification in Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were conducted with Separations Module 2695 (Waters, USA), using the UV/Visible 2489 detector (Waters). Determination of prunasin was performed isocratically using the SunFireTM C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) together with the pre-column Waters (4.6 × 20 mm). The temperature of the column was stabilized at 40 °C. The methanol: water (15: 85 v/v) solution was used as eluent at 1.5 ml/min flow rate, and UV detection was set at 218 nm.
The concentration of prunasin in extracts was calculated from the calibration curve obtained using commercially available chromatographically purified prunasin (ABCR GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) as a standard. Prunasin concentration was first expressed as mg g−1 root fresh mass, and it was recalculated using fresh weight to dry weight root ratio and expressed as mg g−1 DM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis of Hydrozinecarboximidamide-HNK Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Compounds 1d3d and 1e3e were used as intermediates for the synthesis of hydrozinecarboximidamide-HNK derivatives. In brief, the compounds 1d3d (0.05–0.28 mmol) and acetic acid/aminoguanidine carbonate (0.18–0.39 mmol) in ethanol were stirred for 3–4 h at 65 °C, and then detected by TLC analysis, respectively. The reaction was quenched with water and extracted twice with ethyl acetate. The combined extract was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Finally, the residue was purified by a 2535Q semi-prep HPLC system (Waters, USA) using a SunFireTM C18 column (250 × 10 mm) with 35–55%% acetonitrile to afford 1f–3f and 1g–3g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Anthocyanin in Cranberry Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CE was prepared by mixing it with water (Burdick & Jackson, USA) and methanol (Burdick & Jackson) at a ratio of 30:70 (v/v) to 500 mg/L, followed by stepwise dilution to 1 mg/L. Anthocyanin was also diluted to 500 mg/L with the same solvent and used as a standard stock solution. For quantitative analysis of the anthocyanin content in CE, a standard curve was generated by diluting the anthocyanin to 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/L, and the analysis was repeated three times. All substances were analyzed by an injection of 10 µL of the sample into Shimadzu HPLC i-Series LC-2030 LT (SHIMADZU, Japan) and separation at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min through a SunFireTM C-18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Waters, Germany). In addition, mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) added to water, and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid added to acetonitrile (Burdick & Jackson) (v/v). The change in the ratio of the mobile phases is shown in Table 1, and the absorbance at 520 nm was detected using deuterium (D2) lamps (SHIMADZU) over a 35-min period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!