The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Compound microscope

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Leica compound microscope is a scientific instrument designed for detailed observation and analysis of microscopic specimens. It features multiple lenses that work together to magnify and sharpen the image of the sample, allowing for detailed examination and study.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using compound microscope

1

Determining Embryonic Origin of Hau-slit and Hau-robo1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the embryonic origin of the cells expressing specific Hau-slit and Hau-robo1, teloblasts or proteloblasts of embryos in stages 5 and 6 were injected with a fluorescently labeled, fixable dextran lineage tracer, fluorescein-conjugated dextran amine (FDA), as previously described [41 (link)]. Injected embryos were cultured in Helobdella triserialis saline (HTR) at 23 °C to the desired embryonic stage, then fixed, and processed by FWMISH as described above. After FWMISH, the embryos were dehydrated in ethanol and propylene oxide, followed by infiltration with plastic embedding medium (PolyBed, Polysciences, Inc.). Then embryos were sectioned by using a glass knife on a microtome (MT-2B; Sorvall, Newtown, CT, USA) or hand cut by razor blade into 0.1 mm sections. Sections were imaged on a Leica compound microscope to obtain combined fluorescence images (Leica, Wetzlar, HE, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intestinal Parasite Quantification and Histopathology in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following euthanasia, the abdomen of each fish was opened and the entire intestine was removed. Wet mounts were prepared from each intestine by placing the intestine on a glass slide with a 25 × 60 mm coverslip, and the entire intestine was examined with a compound microscope (Leica DMLB, Wetzlar, Germany) at × 200 to quantify the number of total live worms, mature female worms, and dead worms present. After examination, each intestine was preserved in Dietrich’s fixative, processed for histology, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin using our standard protocol [21 ].
Pathological changes were scored by a pathologist (M.K.) based on examination of tissues from each intestine. Following our previous study [22 (link)], two broad categories, inflammation and hyperplastic changes, were scored in zebrafish intestines. A total histopathology score, which is the sum of the inflammation and hyperplasia scores, was also calculated. A description of our scoring criteria follows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

3D Cell Culture and Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2 × 103 cells were placed inside wells containing the 3D culture matrix (Cultrex, USA). The plate was centrifuged at 200×g for 3 min in a swing bucket rotor centrifuge (Thermo Fisher, USA) at room temperature. The plate was incubated at 37 ºC, 5% CO2 for 72 h. Image were taken under a compound microscope (Leica, Germany) every subsequent 24 h for 7 days. ImageJ imaging software [32 ] was used to analyse the size and invasion projection.  
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Toxicity and Developmental Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure compound toxicity, animals were grown to the L4 stage and exposed to compounds as described above. After 12 hours, animals were scored for viability by assessing locomotion and observing pharyngeal pumping. For compounds displaying significant toxicity over the negative control, serial dilution was used to identify the LD50. LD50 values were calculated using Graphpad Prism software.
To measure developmental delay, animals grown and exposed to compounds as described above were viewed under a compound microscope (Leica) and scored for tail development and linker cell survival. Tails were scored as adult if they had shed the L4 cuticle and showed tail ray and fan development.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed Microscopic Examination of Slide-Mounted Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were dissected and mounted on slides by using Canada balsam. All measurements were taken from slide-mounted specimens at 65×, 100×, 250×, or 400× magnification with a Leica compound microscope fitted with an eyepiece reticle. Body length, in micrometers (μm), was measured from the transverse trabecula to the metasomal apex, excluding the exserted part of the ovipositor. The remaining measurements are given either in micrometers or as ratios. Photographs were taken from slide-mounted specimens using a Nikon Ni-E system, and images were processed by Adobe Photoshop.
Abbreviations used are as follows: F1–6 = antennal funicular 1–6; POL = the shortest distance between posterior ocelli; OOL = the shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye margin.
Terminology for morphological features follows Lin [6 (link)] and Rehmat and Anis [7 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Muscle Injury and Permeability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We injected Evans Blue Dye as 1% solution by animal body weight (1 mg EBD/100 µl PBS/10 g) 24 hr prior to sample collection (Hamer et al., 2002 (link)). As a positive control for EBD uptake, we create an injured muscle area by inserting a 21-gauge needle 2–3 times into the jerboa gastrocnemius muscle. Samples were fresh frozen in OCT and cryosection at 12 µm thickness. Slides were processed for MF20 fluorescence with primary antibody incubation for 1 hr at RT before secondary antibody incubation. Slides were mounted for analysis: EBD signal is detected using the Cy5 filter and imaged using the Olympus compound microscope or imaged using the Leica SP5 confocal laser 633 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ectoparasite Identification in Cultured Lutjanus erythropterus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment was carried out with 400 fish specimens of cultured Lutjanus erythropterus fish species from Jerejak Island, Penang, Peninsular Malaysia (5.320097 longitude, 100.3189185 latitude). The length (cm) of each fish was measured prior to parasite examination. Fresh water medium was used as anesthetics to reduce the stress as well as for easy handling. After the fish has been anaesthetized, presence of ectoparasite was examined via external fish body examination and direct observation under light microscope [24 ]. The site specificity of parasite was obtained from head, body, and both sides of inner operculum.
First morphological identification of parasite was done by first staining the parasite with a few drops of lactophenol solutions (200 mL lactic acid, 200 g/L phenol, 400 mL glycerol, and 200 mL deionized water). Upon staining, slides were observed under the compound microscope (Leica, USA). Parasite found was taken out carefully from the infected area, and then the number of parasites obtained from each fish was recorded, preserved with 70% ethanol solution in universal bottle for further examination. After the pictures of parasites had been taken, identification of parasites collected was done by morphological observation using identification keys as suggested by Kua et al. [25 , 26 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cross-section Microscopy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cross-section images of the samples were measured using a Leica compound microscope and a special sample holder for cross-section analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transgenic Drosophila for Targeted Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A transgenic Drosophila model based on the Gal4/UAS system was used to target gene expression in fly tissues. For specific expression in border cells, we generated flies containing UAS-hE-cad WT or UAS-hE-cad R749W together with UAS-mCherry, which were all expressed using GAL4 driven from a border cell-specific promoter (slbo-Gal4, BDSC #58435). For the genetic interaction analysis in the adult eye, we established fly lines carrying simultaneously hE-cad and one RNAi targeting βPS integrin (RNAi #1 obtained from BDSC #27735 and RNAi #2 obtained from BDSC #33642) or UAS-mCherry (BDSC #35787), as control for titration of the number of UAS lines in the organism. These lines were then crossed with the GMR-Gal4 line and the appropriate progeny was selected. Eye phenotypes of at least 200 progeny flies (per condition) from three independent experiments were evaluated under a Leica compound microscope. Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6. For further details, see Supplementary Materials and Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histological and Molecular Biomarker Scoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Original hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides used for clinical diagnosis collected pre- and post-NST for each patient (1-3 slides per patient) were independently reviewed and scored in a double blind manner by JSW and CFO. Slides stained for ER, PR, Ki67, or SIAH, were scored using the percentage of positive IHC staining within the tumor. Slides with a score discrepancy of greater than 10-percent were then dually re-evaluated by two pathologists together to reach a final consensus score. Slides stained for HER2 or EGFR were scored as 0 (no membrane staining), 1 + (partial membrane staining), 2 + (complete membrane staining in less than 30% of the tumor cells), or 3 + (complete membrane staining in more than 30% of the tumor cells). Slides stained for phospho-ERK were scored as the percentage of tumor cells with cytoplasmic staining. All histology images presented were captured at 400-fold magnification using a Leica compound microscope and Leica DC500 digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!