The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chicken eggs

Manufactured by Charles River Laboratories
Sourced in United States

Chicken eggs are a natural product commonly used in laboratory settings. They serve as a basic biological material for various research and testing purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using chicken eggs

1

Chicken Embryo NCC Differentiation and Grafting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken eggs were purchased from Charles River and incubated at 39 °C until they reached the desired Hamburger and Hamilton stage. For chicken NCC cultures, dorsal neural tubes from cranial or trunk regions of HH8 embryos were dissected using a Gastromaster and cultured on matrigel-coated tissue culture dishes with NCC culture medium12 (link) for 24 h. The neural ectoderm was scrapped off the plates with a tungsten needle after NCCs migrated out from the neural tube explants. The NCCs that remained on the plates were then treated with 4 ng/ml FGF4 or 2 μM RA for 48 h. For NCCs injection, GFP-labeled human PSC-derived NCCs were collected and injected intersomitically into HH10-12 chicken embryos. The embryos were harvested around HH23 for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chick Embryo Tumor Growth Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A CAM assay was performed to assess growth of tumor cells in fertilized chicken eggs (Charles River Laboratories, North Franklin, CT), as described previously [15 (link),59 (link)]. Briefly, eggs were incubated for 10 days in a rotary incubator at 37 °C and 58–60% humidity. CRC cells (1 × 106), stably exhibiting NT shRNA or stably inhibiting PAICS by shRNA1, were applied to the CAM in 50 µL of culture medium. On the 18th day of embryonic growth, the tumors were harvested and weighed. Of the 10 eggs per group, two from each group were non-viable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Propagation and Intranasal Infection of Influenza A Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Influenza A virus (IAV) strain A/HKx31 (HKx31; H3N2) was propagated according to previously described methods (25 (link), 35 ). Briefly, fertilized chicken eggs (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) were inoculated with 0.05 hemagglutinating units (HAU) influenza virus in 100 μL of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), containing 10 mM HEPES. Inoculated eggs were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, followed by refrigeration overnight at 4°C. Allantoic fluid was harvested under aseptic conditions, centrifuged, and frozen at −80°C. The titer of the allantoic fluid was determined by hemagglutination of avian erythrocytes (35 ). Mice were anesthetized by i.p. injection of avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and infected intranasally (i.n.) with a sublethal dose (120 HAU virus in 25 μL) diluted in endotoxin-tested PBS (15 (link), 25 (link)). Infections were performed in the morning (between 8:00 and 10:00 AM). All work with infectious agents was conducted with prior approval of the Institutional Biosafety Committee of the University of Rochester, following guidelines of the NIH/CDC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

H1N1 Pandemic Strain Amplification in Eggs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H1N1 isolate A/California/07/2009 (H1N1pdm09) pandemic strain (Influenza Reagent Resource; Manassas, VA) virus was amplified in fertilized chicken eggs (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). Eggs were incubated at 37 °C with humidity and 0% CO2 for 48 h, before transfer to 4 °C for an additional 24 h. Allantoic fluid was then collected, spun down to remove debris, and titered with turkey red blood cells (Lampire Biological Laboratories; Pipersville, PA) to determine hemagglutination units (HAU)/50 μL − an HAU/50 μL of 512 was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chicken Egg Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken eggs were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA) and placed in an incubator at 37°C, 40% humidity. On day 3, up to 8 mL of albumin was aspirated from a small hole made at the bottom of the egg and the hole was sealed with candle wax. Then an approximately 2 cm large window was cracked into the rounded part of the upright egg using Dumont tweezers (6) and the egg membrane was completely removed. The window was covered with a cap of sterilized aluminium foil. The eggs were then incubated in a cell culture incubator at 37°C, 40% humidity, 3% CO2. On day 7, up to 2 mm filter paper patches were punched out of sterilized Whatman-filter papers (Sigma Aldrich) and placed on a sterile surface. Five microlitres of treatment solution, control medium or ovarian cancer cell conditioned medium from OVCAR-3, OVCAR-5 or COV-362 cells, as indicated, were dropped on each filter paper allowing it to dry for 15 min and carefully placed on the developing CAM. Blood vessel development was observed daily and pictures were taken 3 days (day 10 of egg development) after treatment with a stereo microscope. Vessels crossing the outline of the filter paper were analysed using ImageJ (NIH). Six to nine independent experiments per group were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Influenza Virus Amplification and Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A/California/07/2009 (H1N1pdm09), A/Texas/50/2012 (H3N2), and B/Massachusetts/2/2012 viruses (International Reagent Resource; Manassas, VA) were amplified on fertilized chicken eggs (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA). Eggs were incubated at 37 °C with humidity and 0% CO2 for 48 h, before transfer to 4 °C for an additional 24 h. Allantoic fluid was then collected, spun down to remove debris, and initially titered with turkey red blood cells (Lampire Biological Laboratories; Pipersville, PA). Of note, B/Massachusetts/2/2012 was not ether split prior to conducting serological assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!