The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axs d8 advance

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany, United States

The AXS D8 Advance is a versatile X-ray diffractometer designed for a wide range of applications. It features a high-intensity X-ray source and advanced optics to deliver precise and reliable data for materials analysis. The instrument is capable of performing a variety of measurements, including phase identification, crystal structure determination, and quantitative analysis. The AXS D8 Advance is a reliable and flexible tool for researchers and scientists working in materials science, geology, and other related fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

316 protocols using axs d8 advance

1

Structural and Elemental Analysis of LNMO Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elemental content in the prepared LNMO materials was confirmed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) using an iCAP7000 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Analyses of the phase structures of LNMO materials and electrodes were conducted by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a micro-diffractometer (AXS D8 Advance; Bruker) and the corresponding lattice parameters were obtained by using the supporting software. The order of crystal structures was confirmed by applying Fourier-transformation infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (V80; Bruker) and KBr pellets with a controlled range (400–700 cm−1). The morphologies and microstructures of the prepared samples and cycled lithium anode were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) on a S-4800 system (Hitachi) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on a Tecnai G2 F20 system (FEI) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multifaceted Characterization of Novel Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with a Cu Ka radiation target (λ = 0.154178 nm). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted on Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope at 5 kV. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping profiles and selected area electron diffraction results were collected on a JEOL-2100F system. Atomic-level high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images and the corresponding STEM-EDS elemental mapping profiles were taken on an FEI Titan Themis Z 3.1 equipped with a SCOR spherical aberration corrector and a monochromator. Measurements of time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (TOF-SIMS) were conducted on a TOF-SIMS 5–100 instrument (ION-TOF GmbH). UV-vis-IR diffuse reflectance spectra were measured by a Shimadzu SolidSpec-3700 spectrophotometer in the spectral region of 200–2500 nm. A JEOL JES-FA200 electron spin resonance spectrometer was used to collect the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra at room temperature (9.062 GHz)53 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanostructure Characterization: Microscopy and Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for FE-SEM and EDX were prepared by drop-casting the suspensions containing the nanostructures onto cleaned silicon substrates, with subsequent drying in oven at 120 °C for 30 min.
Morphology and cell interaction investigations were carried out using a Zeiss Auriga FE-SEM available at SNN-Lab, operated at different accelerating voltages (varying between 2 and 5 keV) depending on the sample type.
The chemical elemental composition was investigated by EDX analysis equipped together with FE-SEM (Auriga, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and operated at 17 keV.
The crystalline structure and phase purity analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction using a Bruker (AXS D8-Advance) X-ray powder diffractometer equipped with incident-beam focusing X-ray mirrors and a position sensitive detector (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Data were measured at room temperature, in transmission mode, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å, 40 kV at 40 mA), in a 2θ angular range ranging from 20° to 140° with a step size of 0.022° and 1 s of counting time. Samples were prepared as capillary mounts. Data were evaluated by the Rietveld method using Topas software [54 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Metal-Organic Framework Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization by X-ray powder diffraction was carried out using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance (Bruker, Germany) diffractometer in the range 1–30° 2Θ using CuKα (λ = 0.154178 nm) radiation.
Infrared (IR) spectra were measured in transmission mode using Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) equipped with an MCT (Mercury-Cadmium-Telluride) detector at spectral resolution of 2 cm−1. Before measurement a sample was deposited on an IR-transparent silicon wafer (pure for electronic purposes) by placing its ethanol solution directly on the disc and evaporating the solvent. The wafer was placed in an IR cell with KBr windows and slowly heated under constant pumping (10−3 Torr) to 50°C (with the drug present) or 100°C (pure MOF).
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed using Nova Nano SEM 200 (FEI Europe B.V.) cooperating with the Element Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analyzer (EDAX Inc., U.S.A.) using secondary electrons in low vacuum conditions (60 Pa). Samples of MOF without treatment, MOF after milling and MOF after milling and sonication were analyzed.
The particle size distribution of the powder samples was measured in terms of particle diameter at 50% in the cumulative distribution (Dx (38 (link))) using laser diffraction particle size analyzer Mastersizer 3000 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural and Optical Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder diffractograms were recorded on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer in the Bragg-Brentano geometry, with Cu Kα1 radiation λ = 1.5406 Å, in the 2θ range from 6 to 60°. The reference data was taken from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). The composition of prepared materials was analysed by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer Varian ICP-OES VISTA-MPX and EA Vario EL III. Transmission-electron-microscopy (TEM) images were recorded on an FEI Tecnai G2 20 X-TWIN transmission electron microscope, which used an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were recorded using a JASCO 4200 FT-IR spectrophotometer. DLS and zeta potential measurements were performed by using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument.
The luminescence characteristics (excitation, emission spectra, luminescence decays) of the prepared samples were measured on a QuantaMasterTM 40 spectrophotometer equipped with an Opolette 355LD UVDM tunable laser, with a repetition rate of 20 Hz and a Hamamatsu R928 photomultiplier used as a detector for emission/excitation spectra and decay time measurements. A continuous Dragon Lasers DPSS 980 nm laser was used as the excitation source, coupled to a 200 µm optical fibre and collimator to determine dependencies between emission intensity and laser power.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Variable Temperature PXRD Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variable Temperature PXRD experiments are conducted with a commercial diffractometer (Bruker AXS D8 Advance) equipped with a Cu radiation source, operating with an X-ray tube voltage and amperage of 40kV and 40mA, respectively. Data is collected from 3.0 to 40.0 degrees 2θ , in 0.03 2θ increments at a scan speed of 0.5 seconds per step. Samples are prepared by placing about 15-30 mg of sample in a silicon, low-background sample holder. Samples are heated from RT to the desired temperatures with a ramp rate of 1 °C/min and are held at each temperature for 30 minutes to allow for equilibration before x-ray analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Temperature XRD Analysis of Ti3O5 Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The static powder XRD as a function of temperature was measured in Debye-Scherrer geometry on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance (Mo-Kα radiation selected with a focusing Göbel mirror) equipped with a MRI high temperature capillary furnace and a high-energy LynxEye detector. The flake form Ti3O5 powder sample14 (link) was sealed in a quartz capillary of 0.3 mm in diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Low temperature N2 adsorption/desorption measurements were performed using the Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument (Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to the analysis, the sample (ca. 100 mg) was outgassed at 373 K under vacuum (<1.3 Pa) for 20 h. The surface area of samples was calculated using the BET method, with a measurement error of less than 2 m2 g1. Pore volume and diameter were determined by DFT method.
XRD measurements were performed using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) at a step of 0.05° s1.
Elemental analyses of the solids were carried out with Elementar Analyser Vario EL III (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany).
UV-VIS spectra were recorded using a Varian-Cary 300 Scan UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (Candela, Warszawa, Poland)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD analysis of the films were conducted using an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS D8 Advance, Germany), equipped with Cu Kα radiation source (wavelength 0.154 nm) operating at 40 kV and 30 mA. The XRD patterns were recorded over the angular range 2θ = 0–50º with a step interval of 0.02º.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, pore volume, pore size, and the adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured by using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples were recorded on a Bruker AXS D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu (Kα) radiation with 0.02° step in the 2θ range from 10 to 80°. Diffuse-reflectance UV-vis spectra (UV-vis DRS) were obtained in the range of 200–700 nm with a Shimadzu UV-3600 Plus Spectrometer, using BaSO4 as reference. The Raman spectra of the samples were recorded on a Renishaw Micro Raman Spectrometer in the range from 200 to 1200 cm−1 (excitation line: 785 nm of diode solid-state laser). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the catalysts were taken in a Tecnai G2 F30 S-Twin TEM operating at 200 kV. The XPS data were collected using X-ray photoelectron spectrometer Thermo SCIENTIFIC ESCALAB 250xi with an Al-Kα (1486.8 eV) X-ray source. ICP-OES were performed on an Agilent 5100 inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!