The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultimate 3000 pump

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Japan, Germany

The UltiMate 3000 pump is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump designed for reliable and precise solvent delivery. It features a dual-piston design and advanced electronic control for accurate flow rates across a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

47 protocols using ultimate 3000 pump

1

Analytical Techniques for Chemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were measured on a JASCO P-2000 polarimeter, UV/Vis data were obtained using a Beckman DU800 spectrophotometer, and IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 100 FT-IR spectrometer. NMR data were obtained on a JEOL ECZ 500 NMR spectrometer equipped with a 3 mm inverse probe (H3X), the 1,1-ADEQUATE experiment was performed on a Bruker AVANCE III 600 MHz NMR with a 1.7 mm dual tune TCI cryoprobe. NMR data were recorded in either DMSO-d6 or methanol-d4 and adjusted to the residual solvent peak (DMSO-d6 δH 2.50, δC 39.52; methanol-d4 δH 3.31, δC 49.00). For HPLC-MS analysis, a Thermo Finnigan Surveyor HPLC system with a Phenomenex Kinetex 5 μm C18 100 × 4.6 mm column coupled to a Thermo-Finnigan LCQ Advantage Max Mass Spectrometer was used. Samples were analyzed using a linear gradient with (A) H2O + 0.1% FA to (B) CH3CN + 0.1% FA at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min and UV detection at 220 nm, 254 nm and 280 nm. For HR-ESI-MS analysis, an Agilent 6530 Accurate Mass QTOF mass spectrometer was used in the positive ion mode. Semi-preparative HPLC was performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific HPLC system with a Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000 pump, RS autosampler, RS diode array detector, and automated fraction collector. All solvents were HPLC grade except for H2O, which was purified by a Millipore Milli-Q system before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Untargeted Metabolomics in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water-soluble metabolites were extracted from 10–20 mg tissue samples with 0.1 M formic acid in 4:4:2 acetonitrile:water:methanol, as previously described [22 (link)]. Metabolites were analyzed with a previously established untargeted metabolomics method using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-HRMS) (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA)[23 (link)]. The chromatographic separations were performed using a Synergi Hydro RP column (100mm × 2.1mm, 2.6 μm, 100 Å) and an UltiMate 3000 pump (Thermo Fischer). The mass analysis was performed using an Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS (Thermo Fischer). After the full scan analysis an open source metabolomics software package, Metabolomic Analysis and Visualization Engine (MAVEN) [24 (link), 25 ], was used to identify metabolites using exact mass and retention time. Area under the curve was integrated and used for further statistical analyses. Solvents used were HPLC grade (Fischer Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Orbitrap Fusion Lumos NanoLC-MS/MS analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NanoLC/MS/MS analyses were performed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos (Thermo Fisher Scientific), connected to an Ultimate 3000 pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an HTC-PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics). Peptides were separated on a self-pulled needle column (150 mm length × 100 μm ID, 6 μm opening) packed with Reprosil-C18 AQ 3 μm reversed-phase material (Dr Maisch). The flow rate was set to 500 nl/min. The mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.5% acetic acid and (B) 0.5% acetic acid in 80% acetonitrile. Three-step linear gradients of 5 to 10% B in 5 min, 10 to 40% B in 60 min, and 40 to 100% B in 5 min were employed. For TMT-labeled samples, synchronous precursor selection-MS3 (SPS-MS3) (86 (link)) was performed. The MS scan range was m/z 375 to 1500. MS scans were performed by the Orbitrap with r = 120,000, MS/MS scans were performed by the Ion Trap in Turbo mode, and MS3 scans were performed by the Orbitrap with r = 15,000. Auto gain control was set to 4.00 × 105, 1.00 × 104, 5.00 × 104 for MS, MS/MS, and MS3, respectively. The normalized CID collision energy was set to 35.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Identification and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digested samples were applied to MS analyses. The liquid chromatography with tandem MS (LC-MS) system comprised a PAL HTC-xt autosampler (AMR Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and Ultimate 3000 pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific) connected to a C18 tip column (10 cm length and 75 μm inner diameter, Nikkyo Technos Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan), and Orbitrap LTQ-Velos (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Raw data were processed with the Proteome Discoverer version 1.4.1.14 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the standard workflow. A database search was performed using the Mascot search engine (version 2.6.0, Matrix Science, London, UK) against SwissProt. Quantitative evaluations were conducted using an emPAI index [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of LSW-ET Chemical Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical components of LSW-ET were detected by HPLC DionexTM Ultimate 3000 system (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Inc., USA) equipped with an Ultimate 3000 pump, an Ultimate 3000 autosampler, and an Ultimate 3000 column compartment. Separation was performed using a C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Kromasil) and an optimized mobile phase composed of acetonitrile (solvent A) and 0.2% formic acid water solution (solvent B, v/v). For the combinative elution, elution was achieved using the following conditions: 0-3 min, 9% solvent A; 3-13 min, 9-12% solvent A; 13-15 min, 12-20% solvent A; 15-25 min, 20-30% solvent A; 25-30 min, 30-51% solvent A; 30-50 min, 51% solvent A (total run time 50 min). The detection wavelength was set at 296 nm and the flow rate was 0.8 mL/min. The column temperature was set at 30°C and the injection volume was 10 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nano-LC/MS/MS for Proteome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nano-LC/MS/MS was conducted using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an Ultimate 3000 pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and an HTC-PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics). Peptides were separated by a self-pulled analytical column (150 mm length by 100 μm internal diameter) packed with ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ materials (3 μm, Dr. Maisch, Germany). The injection volume was set to 5 μl, and the flow rate was 500 nl/min. The mobile phases consisted of (A) 0.5% acetic acid and (B) 0.5% acetic acid in 80% acetonitrile. Two-step linear gradient programs ranging from 5 to 99% B over 50 to 90 min were used. An MS1 survey scan followed by MS2 scans were performed according to the data-dependent acquisition mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

UHPLC-ESI-Orbitrap MS Analysis of Additives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An UHPLC-ESI-Orbitrap MS system consisted of an UltiMate 3,000 pump, a Q Exactive mass spectrometer and a accucore aQ C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.6 μm particle size, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, US) were utilized. The column was maintained at 35 °C and the flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min. A gradient elution containing 0.1% formic acid with 20 mM ammonium acetate (A), and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B) was applied. The gradient was hold on 1% (B) for first 1 min and then increased from 1 to 99% (B) over the next 8 min. The eluent was remained for the next 7 min, and then mobile phase (B) was retained to 1% over the next 0.1 min, and this was followed by a 2.9 min re-equilibration period at 1% (B) prior to the next injection. The injection volume was 5 μL. The mass spectrometer was operated at ESI positive (3.5 kV) and negative (2.5 kV) mode. Resolution was set at 70,000 (defined at m/z = 200 and was set at full width at half maximum, FWHM). The precursor list was built by direct infusion mass spectrometry of each individual additive standard at concentration of 1 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Neurotransmitter Quantification in Brain Regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were sacrificed by decapitation 3 h after cessation of treatment with drugs. Brains were separated, and several brain regions (striatum, frontal cortex) were dissected in anatomical borders. The tissue levels of DA, 5-HT, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) were measured using a HPLC with electrochemical detection. Briefly, tissue samples of brain structures were homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 M HClO4 and were centrifuged at 10000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (3–5 μl) was injected into the HPLC system. The chromatography system consisted of an LC-4C amperometric detector with a cross-flow detector cell (BAS, IN, USA), an Ultimate 3000 pump (Thermo Scientific, USA), and a Hypersil Gold analytical column (3 μm, 100 × 3 mm, Thermo Scientific, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1 M KH2PO4, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA, 80 mg/l sodium 1-octanesulfonate, and a 4% methanol, adjusted to pH 3.7 with an 85% H3PO4. The flow rate was 1 ml/min. The potential of a 3-mm glassy carbon electrode was set at 0.7 V with sensitivity of 5 nA/V. The temperature of the column was maintained at 30 °C. The Chromax 2007 program (Pol-Lab, Warszawa, Poland) was used for data collection and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Brain Neurochemical Analysis by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were sacrificed by decapitation 3 h after intraperitoneal drugs administration. Brains were separated and several brain regions (striatum, nucleus accumbens septi, frontal cortex) were dissected in anatomical borders. The tissue levels of DA, 5-HT, DOPAC, HVA, and 5-HIAA were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. Briefly, tissue samples of brain structures were homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 M HClO4 and were centrifuged at 10,000g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (3–5 µL) was injected into the HPLC system. The chromatography system consisted of an LC-4C amperometric detector with a cross-flow detector cell (BAS, IN, USA), a Ultimate 3000 pump (Thermo Scientific, USA), and a Hypersil Gold analytical column (3 μm, 100 × 3 mm, Thermo Scientific, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 0.1 M KH2PO4, 0.5 mM Na2EDTA, 80 mg/L sodium 1-octanesulfonate, and a 4 % methanol, adjusted to pH 3.7 with an 85 % H3PO4. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. The potential of a 3-mm glassy carbon electrode was set at 0.7 V with sensitivity of 5 nA/V. The temperature of the column was maintained at 30 °C. The Chromax 2007 program (Pol-Lab, Warszawa, Poland) was used for data collection and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard stock solutions of ten different substances—quinic acid, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, catechin, quercetin, kaempferol, rutin, apingenin, and apingenin glycoside—were prepared in 50% acetonitrile (2 mg/mL). All solutions were filtered prior to analysis through a 0.45 μm syringe filter and injected three times into the HPLC. The phenolic compounds were identified by analyzing the same extracts with no added standard compounds and with added standard compounds. LC analysis was performed on a DIONEX UltiMate 3000 UHPLC+ focused system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which consists of an UltiMate 3000 pump, UltiMate 3000 autosampler, UltiMate 3000 column compartment, UltiMate 3000 variable wavelength detector, and Chromeleon software. As a stationary phase, an Ascentis Express 90 Å AQ-C18 column (15 cm × 3.0 mm, 2.7 μm, Supelco, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% aqueous trichloroacetic acid (v/v) (A) and acetonitrile (B) with the following gradient elution: 0 min—95% A, 10 min—75% A, 25 min—20% A, and 30 min—95% A. Before each sample analysis, a 4 min equilibration with 5% B was performed. The flow rate was set at 0.425 mL/min, the column temperature was 40 °C, the injection volume was 1 μL, and the time of analysis was 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!