The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clarus 600 c

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Clarus 600 C is a gas chromatograph (GC) instrument designed for analytical chemistry applications. It is capable of separating and analyzing complex mixtures of volatile organic compounds. The Clarus 600 C features automated sample injection, temperature-controlled oven, and high-performance detectors to provide accurate and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using clarus 600 c

1

GC-MS Analysis of HSEO

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical composition of HSEO was revealed by GC–MS analysis using PerkinElmer Clarus 600 C (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, USA) equipped with DB-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness) as per our previous reported methodology (Kalagatur et al., 2015 (link)). The chemical constituents of HSEO were identified by comparing their mass spectra (MS) with NIST/Wiley library and retention indices (RI) literature of Adams (2007 ). The quantification (%) of chemical constituents was obtained from the GC peak areas devoid of correction factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Fecal Short-Chain Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCFA levels (i.e., acetate, propionate, and butyrate) in the feces were measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), as previously described by Guard et al. [16 (link)] with some modifications. Briefly, fecal samples were weighed, lyophilized (cryodos-50; Telstar, Barcelona, Spain), and diluted 1:5 in extraction solution, ethyl acetate. After homogenization for 30 minutes at room temperature, the fecal suspensions were centrifuged (5810 R; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 20 minutes at 2,100×g and 4°C. Supernatants were collected using sterile syringe filters (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). A gas chromatograph (Clarus 600; Perkin-Elmer) coupled to a mass spectrometer (Clarus 600 C; Perkin-Elmer) was used for chromatographic separation and detection of SCFAs in the samples. The GC temperature program was as follows: 40°C for 0.1 minute, increased to 70°C at 5°C/min, 70°C for 3.5 minute, increased to 160°C at 20°C/min, and finally increased to 280°C for 3 minute at 35°C/min. The total run time was 20.53 minute, with a solvent delay of 5 minute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chemical Profiling of PPCS by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical profiling of PPCS was carried out by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis on PerkinElmer Clarus 600°C equipped with DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness) combined silica capillary column and flame-ionization detector (FID). The PPCS was diluted with ethyl acetate (10 μL/mL) and 1 μL solution was used for analysis in split-mode of 1:30. Helium was the carrier gas with a flow of 1 mL/min, and temperature for injector and sensor were set at 250°C and 280°C, respectively. The column temperature was linearly programmed from 40 to 280°C at 4°C/min and documentation of mass spectra was recorded in EI mode (70 eV) with a range of m/z 40–450 amu. The Turbo Mass software application was adopted to operate and acquire data from GC-MS. The individual components of PPCS were determined based on the MS spectra of accessible reference libraries (NIST/Wiley). The concentration (%) of constituent components were obtained from GC peak area with devoid of FID response factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Rhynchophorol via GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of rhynchophorol recovered was determine using a gas chromatograph (Clarus 680), coupled to a mass spectrometer detector (Clarus 600C), with an ELITE-5MS capillary column (Perkin Elmer/USA). Samples (1 µL) were injected through a CTC Combipal automatic injector (Pal System/Switzerland). The run conditions were: helium carrier gas with 1 mL min−1 flow, 50 mL split, and injector temperature of 150 °C. The initial temperature of the oven was 50 °C for 3 min with a heat ramp of 10 °C min−1 up to 200 °C, held for 1 min. The mass spectrometry detector was configured to operate with ionization of 70 eV in scanning mode (SCAN), in the mass range of 25–500 m/z. The temperatures were fixed at 200 °C for the ionization source and 180 °C for the quadrupole. The interface with the mass detector was kept at 200 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fatty Acid and Triglyceride Profiling of Mango and Cocoa Butter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acid composition of mango (M. indica and M. sylvatica) and cocoa butter (Deodorized and non-Deodorised) samples were done by GC (PerkinElmer Clarus 680)-MS (PerkinElmer Clarus 600 C). Five to seven mg of frozen butter dissolved in 1 ml of heptane and 0.05 ml of 1 N Methanolic NaOH were shaken at room temperature for two minutes. After 2 minutes when the two layers were separated the lower layer was discarded and the supernatant) used for GC-MS analysis. The analysis was done in triplicate. On the other hand, a direct infusion mass spectrometry method (API 150 EX MS System) used for the determination of Triglycerides. The nebulizer gas was N2. Scanning done for mass 100 to 1000 in an ESI Positive mode with a flow rate of 90 μl/min. Samples were run once for triglyceride profiling2 7 (link) and percentage of triglycerides were calculated based on the peak intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GC–MS analysis of OSEO was carried out on PerkinElmer Clarus 600 C (Waltham, MA, USA) analytical system equipped with DB-5MS (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness) merged silica capillary column and attached to flame-ionization detector (FID). OSEO was diluted in acetone (10 μL/mL) and 1 μL solution was injected in a split-mode (1:30). Working conditions were as follows: carrier gas was He (1 mL/min); temperatures were set as follows: injector at 250°C and sensor at 280°C, whilst the column temperature was linearly scheduled 40–280°C at 4°C/min. Mass spectra were documented in EI mode (70 eV) with a range of m/z 40–450. Turbo Mass software application was adapted to operate and acquire data from the GC–MS. The detection of the individual components was achieved by comparison of their mass spectra (MS) with those from accessible libraries (NIST/Wiley) and experimentally determined retention indices (RI) with data from the literature (Adams, 2007 ). The percentage of the constitution of the individual components was derived out from the peak areas, devoid of correction factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microwave-Assisted Catalytic Reactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The catalytic tests were performed under MW irradiation in a focused microwave Anton Paar Monowave 300 discover reactor (5–10 W) using a 10 mL capacity reaction tube with a 13 mm internal diameter, fitted with a rotational system and an IR (Infrared) temperature detector. Gas chromatography (GC) measurements were carried out using a FISONS Instruments GC 8000 series gas chromatograph with a DB-624 (J&W) capillary column (flame ionization detector or FID detector) and the Jasco-Borwin v.1.50 software. The temperature of injection was 240 ˚C. The initial temperature was maintained at 120 ˚C for 1 min then raised 10 ˚C/min to 200 ˚C and held at this temperature for 1 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas. GC-MS analyses were performed using a Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 C instrument (He as the carrier gas). The ionization voltage was 70 eV. Gas chromatography was conducted in the temperature-programming mode using a SGE BPX5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). Reaction products were identified by comparison of their retention times with known reference compounds and by comparing their mass spectra to fragmentation patterns obtained from the NIST spectral library stored in the computer software of the mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fatty Acid Analysis by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of FAMEs (Figure 2) was carried out on a “Clarus 600” system PerkinElmer, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a quadrupole analyzer “Clarus 600 C” mass-selective detector (Waltham, MA, USA). The conditions were adopted from Radenkovs et al. [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The constituents of EOs were determined by PerkinElmer Clarus 600 C GC–MS, which is connected with DB-5MS column (30 × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm) and analysis was done as per methodology of Kalagatur et al. and Adams [35 (link)36 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chemical Profiling of CMEO via GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical constituent of CMEO was revealed using GC-MS (PerkinElmer Clarus 600 C, Waltham, United States) attached with DB-5MS silica fused column (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness), flame-ionization detector (FID), and Turbo Mass software program. Briefly, CMEO was diluted with acetone (10 μL/mL) and 1 μL was injected in a split mode of 1:30. Helium (He) was carrier gas at a delivery rate of 1 mL/min. The mass spectra of compounds were determined at an m/z range of 40–450 and ionization energy of 70 eV under vacuum. Identification of the compounds was carried out matching the mass spectra and retention indices of n-alkanes (C-9 to C-24) with NIST05.LIB/Wiley 8th Edition and literature of Adams (2007) , respectively. The quantification of compounds was attained from GC peak areas with devoid of FID response correction factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!