The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Advance neo

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Switzerland

The Advance Neo is a high-performance nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer designed for advanced research and development applications. It delivers superior spectral resolution and sensitivity to facilitate detailed structural elucidation and analysis of complex samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using advance neo

1

NMR Analysis of EPSKar1 and Iron Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H analysis was carried out using an NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Switzerland, Model: Advance- NEO). Briefly, 5 mg/mL of EPSKar1 and EPSKar1-iron (II) complex were dissolved separately in deuterium oxide (D2O) (99.96%). The spectra were recorded at 293.5K (20.35 °C) with an operating frequency of 500 MHz. 1H chemical shifts were expressed in parts per million (ppm) relative to the solvent shift (D2O) as the chemical standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents, starting materials and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received. Thin-layer chromatography was performed on silica gel, spots were visualised with UV light (254 and 365 nm). Melting points were determined on an OptiMelt automated melting point system. IR spectra were recorded on Shimadzu FTIR IR Prestige-21 spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Advance Neo (400 MHz) spectrometer with chemical shifts values (δ) in ppm relative to TMS using the residual DMSO-d6 signal (1H 2.50; 13 C 39.52) or CDCl3 signal (1H 7.26; 13 C 77.16) as an internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a mass spectrometer with a Q-TOF micro mass analyser using the ESI technique. Elemental analyses were measured using Carlo Erba (EA1108) apparatus (Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Solid-state NMR Analysis of Cuticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
15N solid-state NMR experiments were carried out on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer operating at 9.4 T (Larmor frequency of 40.5 MHz) using a 4 mm magic-angle spinning (MAS) double resonance probe head. Around 10 mg of cuticle per treatment (five individuals) was packed in a 50 µL HRMAS rotor to ensure a proper centering of the sample. 1H–15N cross-polarization (CP-MAS) experiments were performed at a MAS frequency of 14,286 Hz with a contact time of 1 ms (1H and 15N radiofrequency fields during CP of ca. 55 and 40 kHz, respectively), and with a recycling delay of 1 s. The experimental time was about 2–2.5 days for each spectrum. The 15N spectra were referenced using L-tyrosine (δ = 40.4 ppm). The 1H–15N–13C double CP-MAS experiment was carried out on a Bruker Advance Neo spectrometer operating at 14.1 T (13C Larmor frequency of 150.9 MHz) using a 3.2 mm Bruker CP-MAS CryoProbeTM32 (link). The MAS frequency was 11 kHz, and the 1H–15N and 15N–13C contact times were 1.5 and 7 ms, respectively. The recycle delay was 3.5 s, and the 65,536 scans were accumulated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

NMR Spectroscopic Analysis of Pharmaceutical Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra (1D and 2D) were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz (400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR) NMR Spectrometer instrument (Model: Advance Neo, Magnet System: Ascend and Magnet Operation Field: 9.4 Tesla). The analytical data of the 1H NMR and 13C NMR are reported in parts per million (ppm). The data were measured relative to residual chloroform (7.26 ppm for 1H NMR and 77.00 ppm for 13C NMR) in the deuterated solvent (CDCl3) for the pure drug. The analytical data of the 13C NMR spectra were obtained with 1H decoupling. Since maleic acid and the mixture of pure drug and maleic acid were sparingly soluble in CDCl3, DMSO-D6 was used as the solvent and the analytical data were measured relative to residual DMSO (2.5 ppm for 1H NMR). Coupling constants were reported in Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Physicochemical Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The melting point test was conducted by differential scanning calorimetry (TAQ2000, NETZSCH) at a scan rate of 5°C min−1, while the decomposition temperature was recorded on a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA5500, NETZSCH) with the same scan rate. HRMS-ESI spectroscopy was conducted on an Agilent 6540TOF with a Brooke solanX 70 FT-MS and Thermo QE ORBITRAP equipped with ESI. 1H, 13C, and 11B NMR spectroscopy were performed on a Bruker Advance NEO with DMSO-d6 as the solvent. When 11B NMR spectra were recorded, a blank sample was run to determine the influence of the 11B signal arising from the borosilicate glass. Infrared spectra were obtained using tableting with potassium bromide on a Fourier-transform IR (FT-IR) spectrometer (WQF-510A). Density and viscosity measurements were recorded at 25 °C on an Anton Parr, equipped with DMA5000M and Lovis2000ME.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

NMR and GPC Characterization of Polymers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 H-NMR spectra were recorded on either a Bruker Advance III (600 MHz) or Bruker Advance Neo (700 MHz) NMR spectrometer at room temperature with CDCl 3 as solvent. GPC was conducted at room temperature, using 5 μm PSS SDV medium combination columns (300 mm × 9 mm) with THF as solvent.
Measurements were performed at a flow rate of 1 mL min -1 with a differential refractometer RI and a multi-angle light scattering detector (Brookhaven Instruments Bi-MwA). The elution times were converted into molecular weights via a calibration curve based on low dispersity polystyrene standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!