The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

76 protocols using sas version 9

1

Investigating Obesity's Impact on Brain BP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were summarized descriptively and assessed for normality prior to analyses employing normality probability plots and Kolmogorov test statistics. Linear mixed models were used to examine the independent and joint effects of obesity (between-group factor) and ROIs (within-group) on BPND values. Between-group differences within each region were estimated to explain significant interactions. Within-group associations were accounted for by fitting three variance–covariance structures to the data (unstructured, compound symmetry, and heterogeneous compound symmetry) with an unstructured form fitting the data best according to the Bayesian Information Criterion. Secondary correlation analyses were not adjusted for multiple tests given the exploratory nature. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.3 (Cary, NC) or SPSS version 22 (Armonk, NY) and considered significant at the two-tailed α = 0.05 threshold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of IEI-EMF Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We evaluated the differences in categorical variables between individuals with IEI-EMF and controls by using the χ2 test and those in continuous variables by using the two-sample t test. The consistency between the participants’ perception of exposure and their true exposure status was assessed using Cohen’s kappa test [32 , 33 (link)]. We used McNemar’s test to evaluate the differences in self-reported symptoms between provocation and sham sessions. We applied linear mixed-effects models to analyze the data of physiological parameters recorded at 5-min intervals by using the LME command of the nlme package of R [34 ]. To minimize the effects of extreme values obtained as a result of measurement errors, we removed outliers by using the generalized extreme studentized deviate method [35 ].
All data analyses were conducted using R Version 3.3.2, SAS Version 9.3 and SPSS Version 17.0. All statistical tests were performed at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Marijuana Use Prevalence and Incidence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prevalence was measured through the questions: “Have you used marijuana in your lifetime?”, “Have you used marijuana in the past year?”, and “Have you used marijuana in the past month?” Prevalence variables were calculated dividing the number of people who used marijuana in a given time, over the total number of students surveyed.
A proxy for incidence is included in the questionnaire, “When was the first time you tried marijuana?” permitting an estimate of the proportion of new users during three time frames: past month, past year, and over a year. Incidence variables were defined as the proportion of students who used marijuana for the first time in the period chosen, among those who had never used marijuana until then.

Marijuana use prevalence were calculated for subgroups of the study population. Significant differences between users in 2009 and 2012 were reported based on p-values of 0.01 when appropriate. Sampling weights were used to produce national estimates. All results were considered significant based on 95% confidence intervals. SAS version 9.3 and SPSS 20 were the statistical software used for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data provided in this study is the average of three replicates. ANOVA was used to analyze all data for randomized block design. The significance of each source is determined by F-test. Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) Significant Difference was used as a post hoc mean separation test (P < 0.05) using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). The treatment was compared based on the significant difference and the least significant difference (LSD P < 0.05). Before evaluating ANOVA, a Shapiro-Wilk test is performed to evaluate the normality of variance. Use Microsoft Excel 2013 for data calculations. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 and SAS version 9.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Incidence of Clostridium Difficile Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rate of CDI in a population group was defined as the number of CDI episodes divided by the person-years of observation (pyo, defined from 1/1/2009 up to the next CDI event, death, or 12/31/2009, whichever came first). For the SID the population of adults aged 18–64 and the elderly in the seven states was obtained from the 2010 census (www.census.gov). Person-years in the SID data were calculated taking into account death (using the midpoint of the death discharge quarter to define the date of death). SAS version 9.3 and SPSS 20.0 were used for data management and analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Eurolight Questionnaire Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We applied the standard computerized algorithm to analyse data derived from the Eurolight questionnaire [22 (link)]. We used numbers and percentages for descriptive statistics and calculated Chi2 tests for comparing patients with EH and CH. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. For evaluating the concordance between clinical diagnoses and Eurolight diagnoses we defined moderate, good and excellent concordance as agreement of diagnoses in 40–60 %, 61–80 %, and ≥ 81 % respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 and SPSS 20.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

NASH Scores: Metreleptin Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8 (La Jolla, CA), SAS version 9.2 (Cary, NC), and SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The primary outcome variable of the open-label RLD clinical trial was the change in global NASH scores. Two-tailed P value of < 0.05 was considered significant as was decided a priori. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. The independent samples t-test was used to compare independent groups. The repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare variables that were based on repeated observations. Differences in each collected parameter were evaluated using a paired test (compared to baseline). P values are marked if they are significant after multiplicity correction. Paired t-test was used to compare month-12 values to baseline (without multiplicity correction) as the change at 12 months vs. baseline was a prespecified endpoint. Different components of the NASH score before and after metreleptin treatment were compared by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Log transformation was applied if needed. If data were skewed, nonparametric tests were used as needed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transgenic Mouse Exercise and Chow Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.2 and SPSS version 21. In all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The following variables were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with genotype (transgenic vs. non-transgenic), exercise (runner vs. sedentary), and chow (valganciclovir vs. control) as the three factors, with all interactions entered in the model: chow intake (grams/day), valganciclovir dose (mg/kg/day) and duration (s) in the target quadrant of the MWM during the probe trial. In Experiment 1, the following dependent variables were transformed to improve assumptions of normality: total number of BrdU-positive cells (square root) in the dentate gyrus, and average distance run on wheels (log). In some cases, where stated, data were also analyzed by two-way ANOVA to determine genotype contributions to certain effects (e.g. within transgenic and non-transgenic groups for running levels, etc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Automated Corpus Callosum Segmentation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mid-sagittal plane of the CC and regions-of-interest were obtained from raw 3D MR images using the Yuki module within the Automated Registration Toolbox (ART) for CC segmentation (Ardekani, 2013 ). Briefly, identification of the mid-sagittal plane was performed for all subjects using a reliable algorithm (Ardekani et al., 1997 (link)), which was followed by automated identification of the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) (Ardekani & Bachman, 2009). Individual voxels belonging to the CC were identified through automated comparisons between each voxel of the mid-sagittal slice and 49 brain atlases that were registered to the image based on AC-PC alignment (Ardekani et al., 2012 ). All voxels identified as belonging to the CC were labeled as one contiguous structure, extracted and saved in NIFTI image format. The NIFTI image of each midsagittal CC area was visually inspected and manually edited when necessary by an investigator (DP) blind to participant characteristics using ITK-Snap (Yuskevich et al., 2006 (link)). The NIFTI images conformed to the CC borders of the original mid-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging cross section. Following editing, measurement parameters of the CC were extracted using ART (Ardekani, 2013 ). Output data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21.0, SAS version 9.2, and SPSS AMOS version 16.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Residual Disease Prognostic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were summarized using proportions, and continuous variables were expressed as the mean (± standard deviation) and median (range). Characteristics of patients with residual and no-residual disease were compared using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous variables. Survival curves were constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. A univariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used in all patients treated with complete resection (N=116) to identify factors individually predictive of residual disease and to determine prognostic factors associated with DFS and DSS. All variables that were significant at the 10% level on univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate model using logistic regression, with two exceptions to avoid problems of collinearity: (1) any RD, RD in the liver, bile duct, lymph nodes, or at other sites, and the number of sites affected for RD were highly correlated and only any RD was considered in the Cox model; (2) T, N, and M stages and the overall TNM stage were highly correlated and only TNM stage was considered in the Cox model. All tests were two-sided and statistical significance was defined as p <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS version 9.2 and S.P.S.S version 19.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!