The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Powerplant pro dna isolation kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in United States

The PowerPlant Pro DNA Isolation Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed to extract and purify DNA from a variety of plant materials. It provides a standardized and reliable method for isolating high-quality DNA samples suitable for downstream applications such as PCR, sequencing, and other molecular biology techniques.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using powerplant pro dna isolation kit

1

DNA Extraction from Powder Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from ∼0.25 g of powder using the PowerPlant® Pro DNA Isolation Kit according to the user’s manual (Qiagen, Arcore, Italy). Extracted DNA was stored at –20°C. DNA concentration was evaluated via fluorimetry using the PicoGreen quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Extraction from Zanthoxylum Spices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table 2 lists the Z. schinifolium and Z. piperitum collections from the National Institute of Biological Resources used in this study. Thirteen spice and powdered herbal materials (ten sancho and six chopi samples) were purchased from verified local market sources in Korea and China (Table 3). Species identification was performed by the National Institute of Biological Resources, Korea. Prior to total genomic DNA extraction, 50mg (dry weight) of each sample was added to a tube filled with stainless steel beads (2.38 mm in diameter) from a PowerPlantPro DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), and the mixture was homogenized in a Precellys® Evolution homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-le-Breonneux, France). Genomic DNA was extracted from the collected samples using the PowerPlantPro DNA Isolation Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Identification and Analysis of Ergot Sclerotia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analyzed sclerotia (n = 111) covers material from four continents. All 13 agriculturally and environmentally important ergot species producing ergochromes, were collected from the wild as well as cultivated grasses and cereals; i.e., C. purpurea s.s. (collections from Europe, North America, New Zealand), C. humidiphila (Europe), C. arundinis (Europe), C. nigricans (Europe), C. spartinae (Europe), C. cyperi, C. fimbristylidis, C. macroura, C. monticola, C. pazoutovae, (all from South Africa), and two undescribed Claviceps sp. (USA, New Zealand). Materials originated from previous studies [2 (link),34 (link),63 (link)] or were collected during the course of this study (Table 1, Table S1). Sclerotia were identified using the ITS rDNA sequence barcode. DNA from sclerotia was isolated using the fast NaOH protocol [64 (link)] for European samples or using the PowerPlant Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio/Qiagen) for US/NZ samples. PCR and sequencing of the ITS barcode was performed according to Pažoutova et al. [2 (link)]. DNA and chemical analyses were done from the same sclerotium in the case of larger sclerotia. In cases of very small sclerotia, chemical analysis was performed from the whole sclerotium and DNA based identification was completed using a sclerotium collected from the same or adjacent grass spiclet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fungal Community DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from all roots using a PowerPlant Pro DNA isolation kit as per the manufacturer's protocol (now DNeasyPowerPlant Pro Kit from Qiagen). Amplicon library preparation was performed according to recommended protocols (Illumina Demonstrated Protocol: 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation) with exceptions. eDNA was amplified using the fungal specific primer fITS7 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Baulkham Hills, New South Wales, 2153) and eukaryotic primer ITS4 as the reverse primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Baulkham Hills, New South Wales, 2153) which amplified the ITS2 region (universal genetic barcode for fungi) (Ihrmark et al., 2012) (link). Twelve extraction controls (i.e., no root sample included in the extraction) and 11 PCR controls (i.e., water used in place of DNA) were negative. PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels, and pooled based on DNA concentrations determined using the Qubit Flourometric Quantification (ThermoFisher). Some glasshouse controls only produced faint bands, but this was equalized at the pooling stage. Uniquely indexed libraries (265) were pooled for the sequencing run, which was performed on an Illumina MiSeq using 600cycle V3 chemistry (300 bp paired-end reads) following the manufacturer's recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA Extraction from Barley Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from excised embryos of five germinated seeds of WT Bowman, WT Steptoe, nec3- γ1 (Bowman background), nec3.l (Steptoe background), and nec3.m (Steptoe background) mutants. DNA extractions were performed on mechanically lysed samples using the PowerPlant Pro DNA isolation kit (Qiagen, CA), following the protocol described by Solanki et al. [57 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative DNA Extraction Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An SDS-based method (modified from Tai and Tanksley [20 (link)]) and a CTAB-based method (modified from Chee et al. [41 ]) conventionally used for sugarcane and citrus (3.0 g of tissue), respectively, were tested in parallel with the TENS-CO method (0.15 g of tissue) for DNA extraction. Two commercial kits, PowerPlant Pro DNA Isolation Kit (SDS-based; MO BIO Laboratories; for rice, potato and tomato) (0.15 g of tissue) and Synergy Plant DNA Extraction Kit (CTAB-based; OPS Diagnostics, Lebanon, NJ, USA; for potato and tomato) (0.05 g of tissue) were also tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Soil DNA Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA for the enriched and unenriched rhizosphere samples was extracted using the PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) using the provided protocol. DNA for the enriched and unenriched endosphere samples was extracted using the PowerPlant Pro DNA isolation kit with phenolic removal protocol (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) using the provided protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Endophytic and Rhizosphere DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total endophytic community DNA was extracted from surface disinfected root samples using the PowerPlant®Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the rhizosphere soil community DNA was extracted using the MoBio PowerSoil® extraction kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA exactions were conducted following the manufacture’s protocols. The DNA yield was quantified using Qubit®Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen) and in a SYBR Safe (Invitrogen) 1% agarose gel by comparison with a high DNA mass ladder (Invitrogen) using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Identification of Strawberry Crown Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from two duplicate 0.5 g crown tissue samples of each plant using the Power Plant Pro DNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Strawberry crown infection was determined by qPCR for M. phaseolina using previously described methods [30 (link)]. F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae infection was assessed by qPCR using the specific primer pair FofraF (5′-CAG ACT GGG GTG CTT AAA GTT-3′)/FofraR (5′-AAC CGC TAG GGT CGT AAC AAA-3′) [35 (link)]. Plants were also processed for pathogen detection and isolation from plant tissue using the protocol modified from [36 (link)]. Surface disinfested crown tissue was finely cross-sectioned with a sterile razor blade, and tissues were used for DNA extraction, and fungal isolation on 1/10th-strength PDA amended with rifampicin (100 μg mL−1, GoldBio, St Louis, MO, USA) and kanamycin (75 µg mL−1). Plates were incubated at room temperature, and crown tissue was examined daily for the emergence of hyphal growth using a light microscope (100×). F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae infection was assessed by qPCR or the crown plating method. Morphological features including M. phaseolina sclerotia and F. oxysporum f. sp. fragariae conidia, developing from fungal growth emanating from crowns plated on culture media, were used to document the recovery of the pathogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Soil and Root Microbiome DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total DNA was extracted from 250 mg of bulk or rhizosphere soil with MoBio’s PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc, Carlsbad, CA). Three grams of root material were pulverized with the Geno Grinder (HORIBA Canada Inc., London, Ontario) and 50 mg were extracted using the PowerPlant Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc.). DNA samples were quantified by fluorescence detection using the Life Technologies Qubit® dsDNA HS quantitation kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). Libraries for sequencing were prepared according to Illumina’s “16 S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation” guide (Part#15044223Rev.B). Amplicon libraries for the bacterial 16 S rRNA gene were prepared using primers F343 and R803 [42 (link)] whereas for the fungal ITS1 region the primers ITS1F and 58A2R [43 (link)] were used. We also used the gene coding for the group I chaperonins (CPN60, also known as GroEL or hsp60) to have an independent confirmation of the 16 S rRNA gene results. The cpn60 UT was amplified using the type I chaperonin universal primer cocktail containing a 1:3 ratio of H279/H280:H1612/H1613 as previously described [44 (link), 45 ]. The three pools were then loaded on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer and sequenced in-house using a 600-cycles MiSeq Reagent Kit v3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!