The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using mms 101r

1

Clonogenic Survival and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clonogenic cell survival assays after mitomycin C (MMC; Sigma) were performed, as described (Maranon et al., 2020 (link)). To assess cellular sensitivity to olaparib (AZD2281; Selleck Chemicals), cells were chronically exposed to 0.5–4 μM olaparib in regular growth medium for 12–14 days, as described (Spies et al., 2016 (link)). Cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet to determine the fraction of cells surviving.
Western blot analyses were performed according to our standard protocols (Wiese et al., 2006 (link)). The following primary antibodies were used: α-RAD51AP1 (Dray et al., 2010 (link); 1:6,000), α-RAD54L (F-11; sc-374598; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000); α-RAD51 (Ab-1; EMD Millipore; 1:3,000), α-PARP1 (ab6079; Abcam; 1:2,000), α-β-Actin (ab8226; Abcam; 1:1,000), α-Tubulin (DM1A; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:3,000), α-HA.11 (MMS-101R; BioLegend; 1:1,000), α-Histone H3 (ab1791; Abcam; 1:10,000) and α-RAD54B (Wesoly et al., 2006 (link); 1:1,000). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch; 1:10,000) were used as secondaries. Western blot signals were acquired using a Chemidoc XRS+ gel imaging system and ImageLab software version 5.2.1 (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation of Polyribosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoprecipitation of polyribosomes was performed as described before (Sanz et al, 2009). Tissue samples were lysed in homogenization buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P‐40, 1 mM DTT, 100 U/ml RNase Out, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, and Sigma protease inhibitor mixture) followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 g. Anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibody (1:150; MMS‐101R; BioLegend) was added into collected supernatant, and tubes were kept under constant rotation for 4 h at 4°C. Protein G magnetic beads (Life Technologies) were washed three times with homogenization buffer, then added into the mixture, and kept for constant rotation overnight at 4°C. The following day magnetic beads were washed three times with high salt buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 300 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P‐40, 1 mM DTT, 100 U/ml RNase Out, 100 μg/ml cycloheximide, and Sigma protease inhibitor mixture). RNA was extracted by adding TRI reagent (Zymo research) to magnetic beads pellet followed by Direct‐zol RNA Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Zymo Research). The RNA concentration was quantified using ND‐1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying SUMO Dynamics in Ischemia-Reperfusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the global SUMOylation status of LVs during ischemia and reperfusion, 40 μg of 1% SDS lysates of LVs was used containing also NEM (10 mM) to block the activity of SUMO proteases. Standard SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions was carried out followed by wet transfer onto 0.2 μm nitrocellulose membrane. SUMO-protein conjugates were analyzed by applying SUMO1 (1:20–1:40 diluted supernatant of 21C7 mouse hybridoma cells) or SUMO2 antibodies (1:2000 mouse, M114-3, MBL) in 5% milk powder in PBS-T. The protein amount of SENP3 (1:5000, rabbit, D20A10, Cell Signaling) was also measured from the same lysates.
To follow the SUMO protease activities, 40 μg LV SEM lysates incubated with either HA-SUMO1-VS or HA-SUMO2-VS probes were loaded on the gel followed by the same procedure as for SDS lysates. The HA-SUMO1/2-VS bound adducts of SUMO proteases were then visualized by anti-HA antibody (1:2000, mouse, MMS-101R, Covance/Biolegend) or by anti-SENP3. In all Western blots vinculin was used as loading control (1:80,000, V9131, Sigma Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Visualizing Protein Biotinylation in HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC, CCL-2) were transfected with vectors containing MAC-tagged gene of interest and cultured either with or without supplemental biotin. Bait proteins were detected with anti-HA antibody (Biolegend, MMS-101R, dilution 1:500), followed by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A-11001, 1:800). Biotinylated proteins were detected with Alexa Fluor 594 streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific; S11227, 1:800). DAPI staining was used to determine the nuclei. Selected endogenous proteins were detected with specific antibodies (Supplementary Data 1a) and subsequently with Alexa Fluor 594 -conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, A11012, dilution 1:800). Wide-field fluoresce microscope (Leica, Leica DM6000, Welzlar, Germany) with HCXPL APO 63×/1.40–0.60 oil objective was used to image the samples. For imaging sub-mitochondrial proteins, confocal microscopy (Leica TCS SP8 STED, Leica) with HC PL APO 93×/1.30 motCORR glycerol object was used. The image files were processed with LAS X (Leica), and ImageJ softwares.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Clonogenic Assay and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clonogenic cell survival assays after mitomycin C (MMC; Sigma) were performed as described (Maranon et al. 2020) . To assess cellular sensitivity to olaparib (AZD2281; KU-0059436; Selleck Chemicals), cells were chronically exposed to 0.5-2.5 μM olaparib in regular growth medium for 12 days, as described (Spies et al. 2016) . Cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet to determine the fraction of cells surviving.
Western blot analyses were performed according to our standard protocols (Wiese et al. 2006 ). The following primary antibodies were used: a-RAD51AP1 ( (Dray et al. 2010 ); 1:6,000), a-RAD54 (F-11; sc-374598; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000); a-RAD51 (Ab-1; EMD Millipore; 1:3,000), a-PARP1 (ab6079; Abcam; 1:2,000), α-β-Actin (ab8226;Abcam; 1:1,000), a-HA.11 (MMS-101R; BioLegend; 1:1,000) and α-RAD54B ( (Wesoly et al. 2006 ); 1:1,000). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch; 1:10,000) were used as secondaries. Western blot signals were acquired using a Chemidoc XRS+ gel imaging system and Image Lab software version 5.2.1 (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generating A20 Mutant Plasmids and Stable Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

A20 mutant plasmids were created using QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) to wt TNFAIP3 obtained from the human Orfeome collection (Horizon Discovery). TNFAIP3 constructs were further subcloned into N-terminal MAC-tag Gateway destination vector.24 (link) All generated constructs were confirmed with direct sequencing. The MAC-tagged expression constructs were transfected into Flp-In 293 T-REx cells (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) with FuGENE HD (Promega). The cells were grown according to manufacturer’s instructions under selection with Hygromycin B (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to create stable cell lines. Expression of stable transgenes was confirmed by western blotting using anti-hemagglutin (HA) primary (Biolegend, MMS-101R) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Carbonate Extraction Protocol with Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbonate extraction was carried out as described previously (Yim et al., 2018 (link)), with the following modifications. Five OD600 units of cells were harvested by centrifugation (2170 g, 5 min, 4°C), washed with distilled H2O and subjected to lysis. The final lysate was subjected to centrifugation (20,000 g, 30 s, 4°C) to remove cell debris and transferred to a new pre-chilled tube. Centrifugation (20,000 g, 20 min, 4°C) followed after incubation with 0.1 M Na2CO3 (pH 11.5). Trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-precipitated ‘total’, ‘supernatant’ and ‘pellet’ fractions were centrifuged (20,000 g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed with acetone. Samples were resuspended in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS–PAGE and western blotting. Mouse anti-HA primary antibody (1:10,000 dilution; MMS-101R, Biolegend) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:30,000 dilution; NCI1430KR, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for immunodetection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoprecipitation and Endoglycosidase H Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radiolabeled cell pellets were resuspended in 100 μl of lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% SDS, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, and 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Quartett)] and mixed with 100 μl of ice-cold glass beads. Cell suspensions were vortexed for 2 min twice, keeping the samples on ice for 1 min in between. Subsequently, the samples were incubated at 60°C for 15 min and centrifuged (6000 g, 1 min, 4°C). Supernatant fractions were mixed with 500 μl of immunoprecipitation buffer [15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, and 150 mM NaCl], 1 μl of anti-HA antibody (MMS-101R; Biolegend) and 20 μl of prewashed protein G–agarose beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pierce) and rotated at room temperature for 3 h. The agarose beads were washed twice with immunoprecipitation buffer, once with ConA buffer [500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 1% Triton X-100], and once with buffer C [50 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)]. The beads were incubated with 50 μl of SDS sample buffer [50 mM DTT, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5% SDS, 5% glycerol, 50 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Quartett) and Bromophenol Blue] at 60°C for 15 min, followed by Endo H (Promega) treatment at 37°C for 1 h. Protein samples were then loaded onto SDS–PAGE gels and separated by electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Affinity Purification of USP11 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
293T cells were transiently transfected with either HA or Flag-tagged USP11, and lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM Na3VO4, 1 μg/ml leupeptin and 1 μg/ml aprotinin) or in 0.1% NP40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 100 mM PMSF, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 10 μg/ml aprotinin). Cell extracts were sonicated twice times followed by centrifugation to clarify lysate and incubated overnight with either anti-HA antibody (BioLegend MMS-101R) followed by capture with Protein G sepharose for 2 h, or Flag-M2-agarose affinity beads (Sigma; A2220). After ×4 washes with RIPA buffer, denatured proteins extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE (NuPAGE Bis–Tris: ThermoFisher), left unfixed and stained with a MeOH-free ProtoBlue Safe Coomassie (S6-0044; Gene flow). Bands corresponding to the molecular weight of USP11 were excised and processed as below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Visualization of Astrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice were transcardially perfused with 0.9% saline (w/v), followed by perfusion with fresh fixative composed of 4% paraformaldehyde in a phosphate buffer (PB, 0.1 M, pH 7.4). The brains were collected and post-fixed overnight before coronal sections (50 μm thickness) were prepared using a vibratome (5100 mz Campden Instruments, Leicestershire, UK). After washing in PB several times, the sections were pre-incubated with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PB for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and incubated overnight with rabbit anti-GFAP antibody (1:1000 dilution, ab7260, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or mouse anti-HA antibody (1:1000; MMS-101R, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) at RT. Immunofluorescence was performed with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-mouse antibody, 1:500; A11001, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA or Alexa Fluor 594-labeled anti-rabbit antibody, 1:500; A21209, Invitrogen) for 2 h at RT. The sections were mounted onto glass slides and covered with coverslips using a drop of mounting medium (Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The coverslips were sealed with nail polish to prevent the desiccation and movement of the samples under the microscope. Images were obtained using fluorescence microscopy (Axioplan2 Imaging, Carl Zeiss Microimaging, Oberkochen, Germany) and then subjected to analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!