The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genechip wt terminal labeling kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Canada

The GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling Kit is a laboratory tool designed for the labeling and amplification of RNA samples prior to hybridization on microarray platforms. The kit provides reagents and protocols for the conversion of total RNA into labeled cDNA targets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

105 protocols using genechip wt terminal labeling kit

1

Microarray-based gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Ambion WT Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to generate a cDNA strand that was fragmented using the GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The obtained fragments were then hybridized onto an Affymetrix Human Gene 2.1 ST Array Strip. Subsequent fluidization and scanning steps were performed with the Affymetrix GeneAtlas System, with designated software (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Bioinformatics analysis was performed in the statistical programming language R using BioConductor software. The robust multiarray average (RMA) normalization algorithm in the “Affy” library was used for the normalization, background correction, and calculation of the expression level of all tested genes. A detailed description of the mRNA microarray was described in our previous articles [14 (link),26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptome profiling of brain regions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the tissue was homogenized, total RNA was extracted from the hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus and prefrontal cortex of each subject using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Germany) as previously described18 (link). Genomic DNA was removed using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen, Germany). Prior to sample preprocessing, RNA integrity was assessed with the RNA 6000 nano kit using the Bioanalyzer 2100 instrument (Agilent, Germany). RNA integrity numbers ranged between 6.5 and 8.2. 200 ng of each sample were processed with the whole transcript (WT) expression kit (Ambion, Germany), i.e., subjected to RNA amplification via reverse transcription to double-stranded cDNA and subsequent in vitro transcription; this was followed by another round of reverse transcription yielding single-stranded DNA in sense orientation. Hybridisation cocktails were produced after fragmentation and biotin labeling of target DNAs following the protocol of the GeneChip WT terminal labeling kit (Affymetrix, Canada). Microarray hybridisation to GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix, Canada) was performed individually according to the manufacturer's protocol using the Fluidics Station 450 with the program FS450_0007. CEL files from scanned microarrays were produced with the expression console (Affymetrix, Canada). The hybridization experiment was repeated twice19 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microarray Analysis of Purified Thy1+ LSK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA for microarray was extracted from FACS purified Thy1+LSK cells using the RNeasy Micro kit (QIAGEN). RNA quantity and quality was assessed using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). For global gene expression analysis, isolated RNA was amplified using the WT Ovation Pico RNA amplification system (Nugen). After labeling with the GeneChip WT terminal labeling kit (Affymetrix), labeled cRNA of each individual sample was hybridized to an Affymetrix Mouse Gene 2.0ST microarray (Affymetrix), stained and scanned by GeneChip Scanner 3000 7 G system (Affymetrix) according to standard protocols. Raw data were normalized using Expression Console Software (Affymetrix) and analyzed using Transcriptome Analysis Console Software (Affymetrix). Unannotated and sex-specific genes varying among samples were removed for analysis. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed using the gene set enrichment analysis tool (GSEA; Broad Institute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptome Analysis of Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transcriptome analysis was performed with GeneChip Rat Gene 2.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Total RNA samples
were reverse-transcribed, amplified, biotinylated, and fragmented using GeneChip WT terminal labeling kit (Affymetrix).
Hybridization and scanning were performed at the Microarray core facility, the University of California, Davis. Scanned images
were analyzed by GeneChip Command Console software and expression values of each probe set were compared with dChip software
(Li & Wong 2001 (link)). Two independent RNA samples in each experimental group were
analyzed. Genes showing a significant difference (p < 0.05) between FB and SC OPCs at 2 times or higher by t-test with
dChip software were subjected to the gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis using DAVID online tool (Huang da et al. 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microarray Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microarray gene expression profiling was performed by the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Genomics Shared Resource (GSR) on Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 Sense Target (ST) Arrays (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Biotinylated sense strand DNA targets were prepared from total RNA (100 ng) using the Ambion WT Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Affymetrix GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling Kit. Briefly, double-stranded cDNA was prepared followed by in vitro transcription to generate antisense cRNA (aRNA), which was used as template for a second cycle cDNA synthesis in a dUTP-containing reaction mixture. The dUTP-containing cDNA was fragmented by treatment with uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1). DNA was then end-labeled with biotin using the DNA Labeling Reagent and deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). All microarray processing procedures, including target hybridization, washing, staining, and array scanning were performe according to Affymetrix’s standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Zebrafish Transcriptome Analysis via Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microarray analysis was performed using the Affymetrix GeneAtlas WT Expression platform. 100ng of total RNA was used to synthesize double stranded cDNA (Ambion, WT expression Kit). Fragmentation of 5.5ug of single stranded cDNA and subsequent labeling was performed using the GeneChip WT terminal labeling Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, Ca). Labeled samples were hybridized (GeneAtlas Hybridization, Wash, and Stain Kit for WT Array Strips) to a Zebrafish Gene 1.1 ST array strip and were read using the Gene Atlas imaging station after washing (Affymetrix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microarray-based Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hybridization targets for the GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST array were prepared using the GeneChip WT cDNA Synthesis and Amplification Kit, GeneChip Sample Cleanup Module and GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Briefly, the cells were harvested in the logarithmic growth phase and total RNA was extracted. Total RNA (100 ng) was converted into double-stranded cDNA (1st-cycle), and the complementary RNA (cRNA) was synthesized by in vitro transcription. After purification and measurement of cRNA, 10 μg was converted into single-stranded DNA (ssDNA, 2nd cycle), of which 5.5 μg was fragmented and labeled. The ssDNA was hybridized to the array described above for 16 hours at 45°C. Following hybridization, the array was automatically washed and stained with the GeneChip Hybridization, Wash and Stain Kit. The Probe Array was scanned using the GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G. Microarray analysis was performed three times using three independent cell cultures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gene Expression Profiling by Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression profiles were determined using Whole-transcript Expression Analysis on GeneChip® Human Gene 2.0 ST Arrays (Affymetrix). Total RNA was extracted 48hours after lentiviral infection using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was generated using the WT Expression Kit (Ambion) and labeled using the GeneChip WT Terminal Labeling Kit (Affymetrix). The hybridisation protocols were performed on GeneChip Fluidics Station 450, and scanned using the Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner. Expression data was pre-processed and normalised using ‘affy’ and the RMA algorithm [32 (link)] and differential expression determined using ‘limma’ [33 ]. Unless otherwise stated, significant difference of expression is taken as q < 0.05 (false discovery rate adjusted) and fold-change greater than +/- 1.5.
For qRT-PCR, RNA was reverse transcribed using Protoscript M-MuLV First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (New England BIolabs) and analysed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) with SYBR green fluorescence. Data were normalized to Actin and GAPDH expression as indicated. See supplementary experimental procedures for primer sequences.
Microarray data has been deposited in GEO as GSE53501 and ChIP-seq. data in EMBL-EBI as SRP035339.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptome Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cells and tissues was isolated using Trizol extractions (Invitrogen). The RNA quantity was assessed by NanoDrop®ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Agilent, Palo Alto, USA). 100 ng of total RNA was amplified using the Ambion® WT Expression Kit (4411973, Life Technologies). Then 5.5 μg of the cDNA was fragmented and labeled with the GeneChip® WT Terminal Labeling kit (901525, Affymetrix). Libraries were sequenced either on Illumina HiSeq 2000 or HiSeq 2500 using v3 chemistry.
Followed by background deletion, quantile normalization, and probe assembly. Different expression genes (DEGs) between normal vs. tumor tissues were detected by the empirical Bayes method [27 (link)]. The p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [28 (link)]. Genes with adjusted p-value < 0.05 and |log FC| ≥ 1.0 were considered as differentially expressed. Enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed with DAVID [29 (link)] and ClueGO [30 (link)]. The enriched GO (BP: biological process; CC: cellular component; MF: molecular function) and pathway terms were listed with participant genes [31 (link)]. Some other databases used are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Affymetrix Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots (100 ng) of total RNA obtained from 3 animals per group on week 9 (cohort 1) and 4 animals per group on weeks 17 (cohort 2) and 22 (cohort 3) were individually converted to cRNA and labeled with a Gene ChIP® Poly-A RNA Control Kit, WT Amplification Kit, and Gene ChIP® WT Terminal Labeling Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Hybridization, washing, and staining were performed using Affymetrix® MoGene2.1 ST Array Strips and a GeneAtlas® Hybridization Wash and Stain Kit for WT Assay Strips (Affymetrix), according to the manufacturer’s protocols. After washing, MoGene2.1 Array Strips were analyzed using a GeneAtlas Imaging Station (Affymetrix). Data analyses were performed using Expression Console (Affymetrix) and Transcriptome Analysis Console (Affymetrix). The cut-off point: ≤−2 or ≥2 of a linear fold change and ANOVA P values were used as described in our previous studies45 (link),46 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!