The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

43 protocols using ap4 porometer

1

Leaf Water Conductance Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf water conductance (LWC) was measured using an AP4 Porometer (Delta T Devices, Cambridge, UK). Measurements were taken c. 3 hours after the start of the light period on the adaxial side of the top-most fully expanded leaf of 5 separate shoots from each of three replicates per genotype. The values reported for each time point are averages of the 15 measurements on each genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Leaf Stomatal Conductance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The measurement of leaf stomatal conductance (gs) [(H2O) mmol·m-2·s-1] was performed using an AP4 porometer (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK). Stomatal conductance was measured in the middle part of the flag leaf by placing it inside the measuring head of the device. The measurement was based on a comparison of the precisely measured humidity changes inside the measuring head with the readings obtained using the calibration plate. Measurements were made in five replicates for each treatment (drought and control) within a line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Water Use Efficiency in Crops

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following Blum (2009 (link)), water use efficiency was dissected into biomass and water use, i.e., water use efficiency for biomass (WUEb) equals BM/WUET. Investigated traits related to WUEb were photosynthetic capacity and stomata conductance. Photosynthetic capacity was approximated by leaf chlorophyll content measured at heading (BBCH 50) using a SPAD-502 Plus chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc., Tokyo). Ten plants were randomly selected in each plot and SPAD values of the flag and/or penultimate leaf of the main stem were recorded at 5 points along the proximal-distal axis of the leaf. Stomatal conductance was measured using an AP4 porometer (Delta-T Devices Ltd., Burwell, Cambridge, UK) in parallel with SPAD measurements at BBCH 50.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Stomatal and Photosynthetic Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal conductance and chlorophyll fluorescence in-field measurements were performed early in the morning. Stomatal conductance was determined by measuring the dynamic diffusion conductance of leaves using the portable AP4 porometer (DeltaT Devices Ltd., Cambridge, UK), in 5 replicates. Chlorophyll fluorescence was determined with the PAM2500 portable chlorophyll fluorometer (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) equipped with LEDs for saturation pulses and blue and red actinic lights, a Leaf-Clip Holder 2030-B with an integrated micro-quantum sensor for recording the photosynthetic active radiation (PAR, in units of flux density μmol quanta/(m2·s)) and also temperature with a NiCr-Ni thermocouple. Hence, the measured PAR parameter is identical to PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density). The effective photochemical quantum yield (Φ) of photosystem II was determined using the following equation: ΦPSII = (F′′m—Ft)/F′′m, where F′′m represents the maximal chlorophyll fluorescence yield when photosystem II reaction centers are closed by a strong light pulse, and Ft represents the continuously recorded fluorescence, according to the manufacturer. In photochemistry, the symbol Φ is reserved for quantum yield, according to IUPAC Recommendations [182 (link)], and represents the number of defined events which occur per absorbed photon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stomatal Conductance and Dry Weights Under NaCl Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal conductance and dry weights were determined in six plants after 1, 6 and 9 days of NaCl treatment (n = 6). Stomatal conductance was measured in fully grown mature leaves with a portable AP4 Porometer (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge) four hours after the lights were on within the growth chamber.
Leaf water potential was determined with a pressure chamber (SF-PRES-35, SolFranc Tecnologías SL, Tarragona) on six mature leaves after 1, 6 and 9 days of NaCl treatment (n = 6). Mature fully developed leaves were excised from the main shoot after the gs measurements and introduced into the pressure chamber. Pressure was applied until xylem sap was visible at the cut surface.
Plant shoot, root and total dry weights were determined in 6 plants (n = 6) per NaCl treatment at day 1, 6 and 9, after oven-dry of the plants tissues at 65°C for 48 hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stomatal Conductance and Photosystem II

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assessment of stomatal conductance was accomplished between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., whereby the measurements were taken in millimoles per square meter per second (mmol m−2 s−1) from fully expanded leaves. This was performed through the use of an AP4 porometer, manufactured by Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, UK. Similarly, the maximum quantum yields of the photosystem II were evaluated by means of the Opti-Sciences 30P+ fluorimeter, with measurements being recorded 30 min post-application of the leaf clips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stomatal Conductance Measurement in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All stomatal conductance measurements were performed on 5–6-week-old Arabidopsis plants. The stomatal conductance determined by the AP4 Porometer (Delta-T Devices) was calculated based on the mean value from 2–3 leaf recordings per plant (Figs. 3b, 4c, 5c, 6c, d and 9; Supplementary Fig. 10d, 11d, g and 14c). The time-dependent stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthetic rate was recorded using LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Biosciences) equipped with an Arabidopsis leaf chamber fluorometer (under 150  µmol m−2 s−1 light with 10% blue light, 150 mmol s−1 flow rate, 400 ppm CO2 mixer, ~50 % relative humidity at 22 °C) as indicated (Fig. 4d; Supplementary Fig. 8g, h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Leaf Stomatal Conductance Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal conductance was estimated on a fully expanded leaf randomly taken from the upper part of the plant using a steady-state porometer (AP4 Porometer; Delta-T Devices). Stomatal conductance (gs) was measured between 900 and 1100 h on sunny days at 8, 15, and 45 dai.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stomatal Conductance Measurement in Wheat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An AP4 Porometer (Delta-T Devices, Cambridge) was used to measure stomatal conductance (gs4, mmol m−2 s−1) from 60 to 70 DAS in WW21 (three times) and IWD21 (five times) coinciding with the pre-heading period. The porometer measured the gs4 of the abaxial side of the youngest fully expanded leaf by clipping the sensor head onto a leaf on clear sunny days between 10:00 and 12:00. On each measurement occasion, the mean of two plants was used to determine gs4 for each plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Root Hydraulic Conductivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal conductance was determined after 24 hours of the application of the treatments in eight plants (n=8) per treatment combination. Stomatal conductance was measured in the last fully developed mature leaves with a portable AP4 Porometer (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge) three hours after the lights were turned on within the growth chamber at around 400 µmol m -2 s -1 light intensity.
Root hydraulic conductivity (Lp o ) was determined in eight detached roots per treatment combination (n=8), 24 h after the application of the different treatments, just after the gs measurements. Plant shoots were cut 2 cm above the root collar, just below the cotyledons, and the exudates collected with a silicone tube after one hour. The exudates collected for the fifteen first minutes were discarded to avoid phloem contamination. A cryoscopic osmometer (Osmomat 030, GonotecGmbh, Berlin) was used to determine the osmolarity of the exuded sap and the nutrient solution. Osmotic root hydraulic conductivity was calculated as Lp o =J v /∆Ψ s , were J v is the exuded sap flow rate per root volume and ∆Ψ s the osmotic potential difference between the nutrient solution and the exuded sap (Aroca et al. 2006) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!