The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using ab290

1

ChIP Protocol with DTBP and Formaldehyde

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as described earlier2 (link), 73 (link) with the modification that cells were fixed first with 5mM DTBP (Pierce-Thermo scientific) and then with 1% formaldehyde. Immuno precipitation was performed using anti-GFP antibody (Abcam ab290) or mock IgG (Santacruz). Promoter segment enrichment was analyzed by qPCR using primers P49-56 (Suppl. Table 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular proteins were extracted as described (Sabbir et al., 2010 (link)). The cell lysate was pre-cleared and immunoprecipitated using anti-Dlc1 and anti-Myh9 antibodies as described (Sabbir et al., 2012 (link)). The western blots were immunoblotted with anti-GFP (ab-290), anti-Myh9 (Sc-98978, Santa Cruz Biotechnology (SCBT) Dallas, TX; ARP48072_P050, Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA), anti-phospho-Myh9-Ser-1943 (CST-5026, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), anti-Plectin (sc-33649, SCBT) and anti-Spectrin, antibodies (Sc-32931,SCBT) and visualized. Immuno-blots were scanned using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager scanner and quantified by densitometry using ImageQuant software (version 1.2; both from Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transfection of Hippocampal Neurons for Shank3 Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hippocampal neurons were prepared from postnatal day 1 mice of C57BL/6 J background, and cultured as described previously [36 (link)]. At 7 days in vitro (DIV 7), neurons on each coverslip in 24-well plates were transfected with 200 ng of pEGFP-C1 (Clontech), 30 pmol of miRNA duplex, and 200 ng of pcDNA3.1 (as filler, Invitrogen) or HA-Shank3 (with or without 3′UTR) plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000. For inhibition of endogenous miRNAs, neurons were transfected with 200 ng of pEGFP-C1, and 50 pmol of LNA-inhibitor (miRCURY EXIQON) or 800 ng of ciRS-7-ir/ciRS-7 plasmids. 30 pmol of Shank3 siRNA (Ambion, s81603) was co-transfected for the rescue experiments. At DIV 14, transfected neurons were fixed with 4 % formaldehyde/4 % sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and permeabilized with 0.2 % Tx-100 in PBS. PBS with 0.1 % BSA and 3 % horse serum was used for blocking and antibody incubation. Rabbit GFP (1:500, Abcam, ab290) and mouse HA (1:300, Santa Cruz) antibodies were used for immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ChIP Protocol with DTBP and Formaldehyde

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as described earlier2 (link), 73 (link) with the modification that cells were fixed first with 5mM DTBP (Pierce-Thermo scientific) and then with 1% formaldehyde. Immuno precipitation was performed using anti-GFP antibody (Abcam ab290) or mock IgG (Santacruz). Promoter segment enrichment was analyzed by qPCR using primers P49-56 (Suppl. Table 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibody Panel for Synaptic Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used for this study: rabbit anti‐VAPA (homemade #1006‐04; Teuling et al, 2007) and anti‐VAPB (homemade #1006‐00; Teuling et al, 2007); mouse anti‐synaptotagmin (SySy, 105311, clone 604.2); rabbit anti‐SCRN1 (SySy, 289003; used in Fig 1E), rabbit anti‐SCRN1 (Abcam, ab105355; used in Fig EV1D), and rabbit anti‐SCRN1 (Sigma, HPA024517, RRID:AB_2184811; used for all other experiments; validation SCRN1 antibodies in Fig EV1G–J); guinea pig anti‐vGlut (Millipore, ab5095); rat anti‐HA (Roche, 1867423; used for immunostainings); mouse anti‐HA (BioLegend, mms‐101p, clone 16B12; used for immunoblots); mouse anti‐actin (Chemicon, MAB1501R, clone C4); rabbit anti‐GFP (Abcam, ab290); mouse anti‐Myc (Santa Cruz, SC40, clone 9E10); and mouse α‐Tubulin (Sigma, T5168, clone B‐5‐1‐2, RRID:AB_477579). The following secondary antibodies were used for this study: anti‐rabbit Alexa 488 (Life Technologies, A11034), anti‐rabbit Alexa 568 (Life Technologies, A11036), anti‐rat Alexa 568 (Life Technologies, A11077), anti‐guinea pig Alexa 568 (Life Technologies, A11075), anti‐mouse Alexa 647 (Life Technologies, A21236), anti‐mouse anti‐HRP (Dako, P0260), anti‐rabbit anti‐HRP (Dako, P0399), anti‐mouse IRDye 680LT (Li‐Cor, 926‐68020), and anti‐rabbit IRDye 800CW (Li‐Cor, 926‐32211).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemistry of Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed using primary antibodies against desmin (rabbit, Lab Vision Cat.No RB-9014-P, Thermo Fisher Scientific), αSMA (mouse, FITC-conjugated, Sigma-Aldrich F3777), keratin (rabbit, DAKO Z0622), keratin 19 (rat, Troma-IIIc, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa), osteopontin (goat, R&D AF808), F4/80 (rat, AbD serotec MCA497A64), pSMAD2 (rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology, m3108, goat), pSMAD3 (rabbit, Abcam ab52903), GFP (rabbit, Abcam ab290) and HNF4α (goat, Santa Cruz Biotechnology SC-6556), and matching secondary anti-rabbit (donkey, A21207), anti-rat (chicken, A21472), anti-FITC (rabbit, A11090) and anti-goat (chicken, A21468) with various fluorescent conjugates (all Invitrogen), Confocal microscopy was performed on a Nikon A1 confocal laser microscope (Nikon Instruments) using a 20x lens or 40x and 60x oil immersion lenses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

C. elegans Strains and Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. elegans strains were cultured as previously described by Brenner [11 (link)]. Strain VS20 hjIs67[Patgl-1::atgl-1::GFP] [12 (link)] was obtained from CGC and subsequently crossed into CB1370 daf-2(e1370) and MR1000 daf-2(e1370); aak-1(tm1944); aak-2(ok524) strains. Strains MR1348 daf-2(e1370); rrEx226[sur-5p::GFP::ATGL-1::HA; rol-6(gf)] and MR1413 daf-2(e1370); rrEx239[syr-5p::GFP::ATGL-1(S303A)::HA; rol-6(gf)] are described in [9 (link)]. The strain atgl-1(tm3116) harbors a 423bp deletion of the atgl-1 gene and was obtained from National BioResource Project, Tokyo, Japan. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against ATGL-1 was raised using a synthetic peptide CTKRKVPDEPTTSKR (GenScript). Anti-PAR-5 antibody was a gift from Dr. Andy Golden. Anti-GFP (abcam ab290), anti-ubiquitin (Santa Cruz SC8017) and anti-P-14-3-3 (Cell Signaling #2981S) antibodies are available commercially.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein (50 μg) or histone (5 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane(GE Healthcare). The membrane was blocked with 5% milk and probed with specific primary antibodies and secondary antibodies. The blots were developed with ECL Advance Western Blotting Detection Kit (Amersham, #34080). The antibodies used in this study include Anti-Nanog antibody (Bethyl, A300-397A), anti-Rad51 antibody (Abcam, Ab63801), anti-HA antibody (Bethyl, A190-108A), anti-γH2AX antibody (Bethyl, A300-081A), anti-H3 antibody (Abcam, ab1791), anti-GST antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-138), anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290), anti-β-tubulin (Santa Cruz, sc-166729) and anti-GAPDH antibody (Bethyl, A300-641A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Induction and Analysis of Polyglutamine Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
16Q-TBP and 59Q-TBP cells were induced using 6 µg/ml doxycycline (Clonetech) and 5 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma). Cells were harvested 48 h after treatment using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) for RNA isolation. RNA was isolated as per the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA synthesis was performed using M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (NEB) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using KAPA SYBR Master Mix. Primers used in the study have been listed in Supplementary Table 1. For protein extraction, induced cells were harvested 48 hr after treatment using RIPA buffer (Sigma). Protein was quantitated using BCA method and Immunoblotting was performed. Primary antibodies for STAT1 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 9172), pSTAT1 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 7649), TBK1 (Abcam, ab40676) and IRF3 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 4302) were used at 1:1000 dilution. Anti-polyglutamine-expansion specific antibody (Millipore, MAB1574), Anti-GFP (Abcam, ab290) and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc32233) were used at 1:5000 dilution. was used a housekeeping control at 1:5000 dilution. Secondary antibodies used was conjugated with Horseradish Peroxidase or by infrared dye and hence, blots were developed using chemiluminescence or scanned in infrared LI-COR Odyssey scanner, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cardiac Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were embedded with optimum cutting temperature compound after fixation and were sectioned at 10–14 μm increments. After washing with PBS and 1 h of preincubation with 1% BSA in PBS for blocking, sections were incubated with 500 × diluted primary antibodies (anti-GFP: Nakalai GF090R or Abcam ab290; anti-Tbx1: Santa Cruz sc-17874; anti-Tbx18: Santa Cruz SC17869; anti-Wt1: Abcam ab10670; anti-Nkx2-5: Abcam ab35842; anti-TnT: Thermo MS-295-P0; anti-Hcn4: Alomone Labs APC052; anti-RFP: MBL PM005; anti-β-catenin: Millipore 05-665; anti-Ki67: Abcam ab15580) at 4 °C overnight. The sections were then incubated with 500 × diluted secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 or 555 (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. For LacZ-staining, frozen sections were incubated with X-gal solution at room temperature overnight after washing with PBS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!