The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using anti cd69 apc

1

BiTE-Mediated Jurkat Cell Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
If adherent target cells were used, target cells were first treated with accutase (Cat#A1110501, Thermo Fisher, USA) to create a single cell suspension. Jurkat cells and target cells were then resuspended in complete RPMI and placed in 96-well plates at varying ratios of Jurkat and target cells as shown in the text. Unless otherwise stated in the text, 50ul of BiTE containing HEK supernatant were added to appropriate wells. Complete media was then added to equalize plating volume. Plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for either 16 or 40 hours, followed by staining with anti-CD69 APC (Cat#340560, BD Bioscience, USA) at 0.25ul per well in no-wash format. Plates were incubated in the dark at RT for 15 minutes and analyzed via flow cytometry using BC Fortessa device (BD Bioscience, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

T-cell activation and proliferation assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human T cells were incubated with 1 × 105 PA-1/luc cells in an E:T ratio of 5:1 in the presence of 6PHU3 in a six-well plate (Nunc) for 48 h. Effector cell-containing supernatant was collected and re-suspended in FACS-buffer supplemented with fluorescent-conjugated anti-human antibodies anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD25-PE, anti-CD69-APC (BD Biosciences) and 7-AAD to measure T-cell activation of live cells.
Proliferation was measured with the Cell Trace CFSE reagent (Molecular Probes). In a 96-well plate, 2 × 104 target cells were seeded together with 2 × 105 CFSE-labeled human T cells and bi-(scFv)2 protein. After 72 h of incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2, T cells were harvested and stained with anti-CD45-APC (BD Biosciences) and the viability dye eFluor 506 (eBioscience) to gate live CD45+ T cells. Sample processing was performed on a FACSCantoII and with FlowJo 7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Co-cultures containing peptide-pulsed DCs and PBMCs at a ratio of 1:10 (final concentrations 2 × 105 DCs/ml and 2 × 106 PBMCs/ml) were harvested after 1 week. Cultures with DCs that had not been peptide-pulsed served as controls. T cells specific for the MelanA peptide were detected with HLA-A0201-PE ELAGIGILTV tetramer (produced in house according to Rodenko et al.34 (link)). Harvested cells were stained with the tetramer for 15 min, then anti-CD3-APC-H7, anti-CD4-AlexaFluor700, anti-CD8-PE-Cy7, anti-CD56-BV421, anti-CD16-FITC, anti-CD69-APC, and anti-CD27-BUV395 (all from BD Bioscience) were added and incubated for another 20 min. After washing twice with phosphate buffered saline, cells were acquired on a FACS Fortessa (BD Bioscience). CD8+ T cells and NK cells were distinguished and characterized via expression of CD3, CD56, CD8, and CD69. The gating strategy is depicted in Supplemental Figure S8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was undertaken according to our previously published methods (33 (link)). The method utilized whole blood analysis with red cell lysis using Easylyse (BD Biosciences) and with anti-CD56 PE, anti-CD16 FITC, anti-CD3 PE Cy5 and anti-CD69 APC (all supplied by BD Pharmingen). Flow cytometric analysis was undertaken on a Facscalibur (BD Biosciences), and using Cellquest Pro software. A minimum number of 10,000 cells were counted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Mucosal and Splenic Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small intestinal mucosal cells were isolated, and the epithelial layer cells were purified separately using 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (1.5 mg/mL collagenase type II (Gibco) in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free Hank’s balanced salt solution, respectively, as described by Hurasato et al. [34 (link)]. These cells were stained with anti- major histocompatibility complex MHC II PE (phycoerythrin) (BD Pharmingen, clone AF6-120.1), anti-CD11b FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (BD Pharmingen, clone M1/70), anti-CD11c (BD Pharmingen, clone HL3), and anti-CD103 APC (allophycocyanin) (BD Pharmingen, clone M290).
The spleens were removed from all the experimental mice at day 1 after the last immunization. The spleens were perfused with PBS-1x, and then the cell suspension was centrifuged at 300× g and resuspended in RPMI-1640 + 10% FBS for 5 min. The pellets were washed, counted in a hematologic chamber, and stained with anti-CD45 FITC (BD Pharmingen, clone 30-F11), anti-CD4 PE (BD Pharmingen, clone RM4-5), and anti-CD69 APC (BD Pharmingen, clone H1.2F3). Data were acquired using a FACSVerse flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the software FlowJo 7.6.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Profiling of NK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare the surface expression of CD16, CD69, and CD161 on NK cells at the whole range and single-cell level, PBMCs of healthy donors were pre-incubated with cytokines for 12 h and then washed with PBS. All samples were stained with anti-CD3 eFluor 450 (ebioscience, clone UCHT1), anti-CD16 APC-Cy7 (BD, clone 3G8), anti-CD56 PE-Cy7 (BD, clone B159), anti-CD69 APC (BD, clone FN50), and anti-CD161 PE-Cy5 (BD, clone DX12). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA, USA) except anti-CD3 from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA, USA). NK cells were defined as phenotype of CD3CD56+ and the frequencies of CD16, CD69 and CD161+ NK cells were analyzed. CD16/CD69/CD161 expressions on NK cells were acquired on BD FACS Fortessa (BD Biosciences, USA) and then analyzed by FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
The prepared samples were also run on ImageStream χ MarkII system (Amnis Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA) to acquire the data of CD16/CD69/CD161 expressions on single-cell. Twenty thousand events were collected for each sample and single-color control was used to create a compensation matrix to correct for spectral overlap. Collected data were analyzed using IDEAS 3.0 software (Amnis Corporation, Seattle, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Surface Marker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze cell surface expression levels of the various markers, the cell suspensions (1 × 106) were incubated with following mAbs: anti-CD3-APC, anti-B220-FITC, anti-CD4-PE, anti-CD4-FITC, anti-CD8-FITC, anti-NK1.1-PerCP.Cy5.5, anti-PLZF-PE, anti-CD44-FITC, anti-CD69-APC, anti-CD62L-PE, anti-CD62L-PErCP, anti-CD25-APC, anti-CD122-PE, and anti-CD127-PE (all BD Pharmingen) acquired in a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Jurkat Cell Electroporation and Immune Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Healthy cultures of Jurkat cells with cell density between 0.25 and 1×106 cells/mL were maintained in culture for several weeks. Prior to electroporation, a recovery plate was prepared using pre-warmed RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum and 100 ug/ml of L-glutamate. Jurkat cells were pelleted via centrifugation, then resuspended in 100ul of 1SM buffer (as per [19 (link)]) and 2ug of plasmid and brought to room temperature. Cells were then placed into a 0.2cm electroporation cuvette (Cat#1652086, Bio-Rad, USA) and electroporated using a Lonza Nuceleofactor Electroporator using X4 settings. Cells were then immediately transferred to the recovery plate. Cells were allowed to recover for 4 hours prior to analysis or use in an assay. Post-recovery Jurkat cells and target cells were then resuspended in complete RPMI and placed in 96-well plates at varying ratios of Jurkat and target cells as shown in the text. If adherent target cells were used, cells were first treated with Accutase (Cat#A1110501, Thermo Fisher, USA) to create a single cell suspension. Plates were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for either 16 to 40 hours. Plates was then stained with anti-CD69 APC (Cat#340560, BD Bioscience, USA) at 0.25ul per well in no-wash format. Plates were then incubated in the dark at RT for 15 minutes and analyzed via flow cytometry using a BD Fortessa device (BD Bioscience, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Immune Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-CD25-APC-Cy5, anti-CD127-Alexa-Fluor700, anti-CD4-FITC or Pacific blue, anti- CD45RA-FITC or PE-Cy5, anti-CCR7-PE, or PE-Cy7, anti-CD8-PerCP, anti-CD3-AmCyan, anti-IFN-gamma-FITC or APC-Cy7, anti-CD69-APC, anti-PD-1-PE and anti-PD-L1-PECy7, anti-FoxP3-PE were all products of BD Biosciences. Cells were analysed by FACSCanto II, and LSR II (BD Immunocytometry systems). At least 20 000 CD4 or CD8-gated events, and at least 100000 CD4 or CD8-gated events were collected for cell surface and intracellular studies, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotypic Analysis of T-cells by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry analysis of T-cell phenotype was performed according to the protocols as previously described. [21] [22] [23] Monoclonal antibodies used in this study including anti-CD3-BV605, anti-CD45-PE, anti-CD4-BV421, anti-CD8-APC-R700 anti-CD95-DX2, anti-CD28-CD28.2, anti-HLA-DR-PE-Cy7, anti-CD69-APC and anti-CCR5-PE, were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). Anti-CD38-FITC was obtained from StemCell Technologies (Vancouver, BC, Canada). Anti-CD25-APC was from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA), and anti-CD127-PE was a product of Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). CD4 + T cell differentiation was identi ed in terms of CD28 and CD95 expression, as CD28 + CD95 + CD4 + T cell de ned as central memory CD4 + T cell (CD4 + Tcm) and CD28 + CD95 -CD4 + T cell as effector memory CD4+ T cell (CD4 + T EM ). CD28 + CD95 + CD8 + T cell was de ned as CD8 + T CM cell whereas CD28 + CD95 -CD8 + T cell was CD8 + T EM cell. In addition, expression of CD25 and CD127 were measured to evaluate regulatory T Cells (Tregs). Activation markers HLA-DR, CD38 and CD69 were measured on CD4 + and CD8 + T cells, and CD4 + CCR5 + T cells were de ned as SIV-infected cells. All dates were acquired and analyzed on a ow cytometer (FACSCanto; Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!