The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using β gal staining kit

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Bioactive Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) was supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and dichlorodimethylsilane were from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany); N-(3-aminopropyl) methacrylamide hydrochloride (APMA) was from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, PA, USA); D(+)-sucrose (99.7%) and 2,2′-azo-bis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) from Acros (Geel, Belgium). The Cy3 Ab Labeling Kit was supplied from Amersham/GE Healthcare (Munich, Germany). The AAV Titration ELISA was from Progen (Heidelberg, Germany) and the IGF-1 ELISA kit (Insuline like Growth Factor 1) from R&D Systems (Nordenstadt, Germany); the Beta-Glo® Assay System was from Promega (Mannheim, Germany); the β-gal staining kit and cell proliferation reagent WST-1 were obtained from Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany). Vectastain ABC HRP kit (Peroxidase, Standard) and Biotynilated Dolichos Biflorus Agglutinin (DBA) were from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). The antibody anti-IGF-I (AF-291-NA) was from R&D Systems (Nordenstadt, Germany). Ultra-pure water (resistivity > 18.2 MΩ·cm) was obtained by reverse osmosis (MilliQ®, Millipore Ibérica, Madrid, Spain) and water for cell culture was from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). All other reagents were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chondrogenic Differentiation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were from Sigma (Munich, Germany) unless otherwise indicated. Recombinant TGF-β3 was from R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany). The anti-SOX9 (C-20) antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany), the anti-type-II collagen (II-II6B3) antibody from the NIH Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa, Ames, USA), and the anti-type-X collagen (COL-10) antibody from Sigma. Biotinylated secondary antibodies and the ABC kit were from Vector Laboratories (Grünberg, Germany). The β-gal Staining Kit and the Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1 were from Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany). The Beta-Glo® Assay System was from Promega (Mannheim, Germany). The type-II collagen ELISA (Human COL2A1) was purchased at Cusabio (College Park, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chondrocyte Differentiation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were purchased at Sigma (Munich, Germany) unless otherwise indicated. The anti-SOX9 (C-20) and anti-TGF-β (V) antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany), the anti-type-II collagen (II-II6B3) from the NIH Hybridome Bank (University of Iowa, Ames, IA, USA), the anti-type-I collagen (AF-5610) antibody from Acris (Hiddenhausen, Germany), and the anti-type-X collagen (COL-10) antibody from Sigma. The biotinylated secondary antibodies and ABC reagent were from Vector Laboratories (Alexis Deutschland GmbH, Grünberg, Germany). The AAVanced Concentration Reagent was from System Bioscience (Heidelberg, Germany) and the Cy3 Ab Labeling Kit from Amersham/GE Healthcare (Munich, Germany). The AAV titration ELISA was from Progen (Heidelberg, Germany). The β-gal staining kit and the Cell Proliferation Reagent WST-1 were purchased at Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany), the Beta-Glo® Assay System at Promega (Mannheim, Germany), and the TGF-β Quantikine ELISA at R&D Systems (Wiesbaden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tumor Tissue Analysis via Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were euthanized at the appropriate endpoint after imaging, considering tumor stage and size. The mice were visually inspected and macroscopically-detectable tumors were collected for further analysis. The skin of the mouse was also compared with the fluorescence image obtained with Maestro, and regions of the skin presenting fluorescence are considered as possible microscopic tumor sites while regions of skin not presenting any fluorescence signal under a certain threshold were considered as possible negative controls.
After removal of tissue, samples were immersed in a 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS solution for at least one hour. The fixative was aspirated and sample washed with PBS twice (PBS aspirated after each washing). The sample was stained using a β-gal staining kit (Roche, cat #: 11828673001) overnight. The staining solution was then removed and the sample washed with a 3% DMSO in PBS solution two times (solution aspirated after each washing), washed with 70% ethanol three times (ethanol aspirated after each washing), and left in 70% ethanol. Samples were processed for paraffin block embedding, sectioning, and hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (Redwood Dermatopathology, Santa Rosa, CA) [22] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!