The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti glut4

1

Evaluation of Protein Expression in Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluation of protein expression was performed as previously described (11 (link), 28 (link)). Briefly, frozen muscle samples were homogenized in sucrose buffer pH 7.4 (10 mmol/L Tris–HCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA and 250 mmol/L sucrose), centrifuged at 760 g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was used as a total cellular protein fraction. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Equal amounts of protein (20–50 μg, according to the target protein) were electrophoresed, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti-GLUT4 (1:3500, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, #07-1404), anti-HK2 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA, #2867S), anti-NFKB1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA, #12540S) or anti-RELA (1:450, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, #7970). The membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary conjugated antibody, according to manufacturer's specifications, and signal was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence procedure. The optical density of the blots was quantified by densitometry (ImageScanner III, GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) and normalized by the densitometry of the respective lane measured in the Ponceau S stained membrane (29 (link)). Results were expressed as arbitrary units (AU) per μg of protein, and considering the mean of control values as 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Analysis of Cellular Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell lysates were prepared by lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycholate, and 1% Triton X-100). On the other hands, membrane fraction was obtained according to previous report22 (link). In brief, cells were harvested with buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol) containing 0.1% NP-40), and disrupted by passing through a 25-gauge needle 10 times. The homogenate centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the precipitate was suspended in NP-40-free buffer A and recentrifuged at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The precipitate was suspended again in buffer A containing 1.0% (v/v) NP-40 and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. After the incubation, each homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 2 0 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and stored as the plasma membrane fraction at -80 °C until use. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, then blotted onto PVDF membrane. Antibodies for the detection of specific protein were anti-AKT (#9272, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Phospho-AKT (Ser473) (#4058, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-GLUT4 (07–1404, Merck), and anti-Actin (A2066, Sigma-Aldorich). The bands visualized using LuminoGraph I (Atto Co., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblotting Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cellular proteins were collected with SDS-lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor
cocktail (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and benzonase digested. Tissue was
collected in RIPA buffer with PIC. Tissues were homogenated using a Dounce
homogenizer. After centrifugation (14,000 rpm; 15 min; 4°C) and removal of
eventual fat layers, protein concentrations were determined with the bicinchoninic
acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Primary antibodies used were
anti-APMAP mouse monoclonal 46F raised against full-length human APMAP (epitope
unknown; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, or Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA),
anti-GLUT4 (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-β-actin
(Sigma-Aldrich), anti-His (GE Healthcare), anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-LOXL3
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-GAPDH (Cell Signaling
Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti–α tubulin (Abcam), anti-phospho-Akt
(Ser473) XP (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-Akt (pan) (Cell Signaling
Technology). Secondary antibody signals were visualized by ECL SuperSignal West Pico
Chemiluminescence substrate (Pierce) or Amersham ECL prime substrate (GE Healthcare)
using the G:Box detection system (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cardiac Tissue Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The previously frozen tissues were sectioned at seven microns on a cryostat. Tissue samples for Picro Sirius Red were sectioned at 20 microns and processed by the UIC Research Resources Center (RRC) Histology Core. Heart sections from all four groups were placed on the same slide to minimize artifacts. ImageJ was utilized to quantify the percentage of red staining per image.
The slides for immunofluorescent staining were fixed for 20 min in −20 °C MetOH, washed 3 times in 4 °C PBS for 3 min, and blocked in 5 % FBS in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. The slides where incubated with anti-γ sarcoglycan (1:100, Novocastra Labs, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), anti-Glut4 (1:50, EMD Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) or anti-fibronectin (1:100, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS with 5 % fetal bovine serum for 1 h at room temperature, then aspirated and washed three times for 15 min in 4 °C PBS. The secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) at 1:500 in 5 % FBS in PBS were placed onto the slide for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. After another series of washes, the slides were mounted using Vectashield mounting solution, with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Heart sections from all four slides were affixed to a single slide to minimize artifacts. ImageJ was used to get the average intensity of staining across each section or along a line segment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!