The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using labram hr evolution spectrometer

1

Strain Sensing Characterization of Smart Yarns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SEM characterization was accomplished using a JEOL JSM-7001F FE-SEM. Raman spectra were recorded on a HORIBA LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer. XRD characterization was performed on Rigaku D/max 2550 with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54°). In addition, the yarn was sputter coated with platinum before being examined by FE-FEM.
To facilitate measurement and reduce contact resistance, two copper pieces were pasted onto each end of the yarn using conductive silver paste before strain sensing tests. The electric properties of the smart yarns were measured by a Keithley 2510 source meter. The sensing performances were evaluated by a mechanical-electric coupling test including a universal testing machine (MTS E44.104 with 500 N load cell) and the source meter. The tension was controlled by the universal testing machine with the fixed deformation rate of 20 mm/min and real-time changes of the sensor resistance were recorded by the source meter programmed by LabVIEW. The sensing performance under other deformation rates was summarized in Supplementary Fig. S6, showing no frequency dependence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD was carried out with
a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray platform using Cu Kα radiation
in θ–2θ geometry and an angular range from 2 to
70° in 0.02° steps. The sample was kept in a glass capillary
under ambient conditions.
Raman spectroscopy characterization
was carried out using a Horiba LabRam HR Evolution spectrometer, employing
a HeNe laser (632.8 nm). The laser was focused using a 100× objective
(0.8 NA), thus leading to a laser spot with a diameter of ca. 1 μm. An EMCCD camera was employed to collect
the backscattered light that was dispersed by an 1800 grooves per
mm grating providing a spectral resolution of ∼1 cm–1. The corresponding Raman spectra were then constructed by processing
the data using Lab Spec 6 software.
For XPS measurements, a
TFS K-Alpha X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer
(K-Alpha compact XPS) was employed. The powdered sample was glued
to a sample holder using carbon tape. The primary radiation source
was monochromatized Al Kα (1486.6 eV) using a spot size of either
200 or 400 μm. The base pressure for the measurement was 4 ×
10–9 mbar. For survey spectra, the analyzer energy
and spectral resolution were set to 150 and 1 eV, respectively. High-resolution
spectra were acquired using an analyzer energy of 50 eV and a spectral
resolution of 0.1 eV.
Etching of the surface was carried out
with an Ar ion beam (2 kV,
7.8 μA) for 30 s, effectively removing the functionalized surface
layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surface Characterization via XPS and Raman

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electronic environment of the samples were investigated through XPS (Phi5000 VersaProbe, Ulvac-Phi) with Al Kα radiation. All samples were sealed in a vacuum transfer chamber in the glove box and then transferred into the XPS equipment for measurement. Raman was conducted through the Horiba Scientific LabRAM HR Evolution Spectrometer. The wavelength of laser is 532 nm and the power is 5 mW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra were recorded on a LabRAM
HR Evolution spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin Yvon, France) using the 633
nm line as the excitation source at room temperature. XRD patterns
were recorded on a D/MAX 2500 XRD diffractometer (Rigaku) with a Cu
Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). XPS spectra were performed
on an ESCALAB 250xi spectroscope (Thermo Scientific Ltd., England)
using an Al Kα (1486.6 eV) radiation source. The SEM and TEM
images were recorded by SEM (JSM-7001F JEOL, Japan) and TEM (Tecnai
G2 F20 S-TWIN, FEI, USA). The specific surface areas were tested on
an ASAP 2460 (Micromeritics, USA) machine at a liquid nitrogen temperature
of −196 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Raman Spectra Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Raman spectra were collected in a backscattering configuration using a LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba Jobin‐Yvon), and the spectrometer was equipped with a liquid‐nitrogen‐cooled charge‐coupled device (CCD) and volume Bragg gratings. The wavelength of the incident laser was kept at 532 nm, and the spot size was kept at around 1 × 1 µm2. The scattered light was collected using an objective with 50× focus‐length, and it was dispersed with an 1800 grooves mm−1 grating. The laser power was kept at ≈150 µW, and the focus time was kept at ≈90 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of CO2 Adsorbent Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XRD pattern was collected on a Rigaku Smartlab SE X-ray diffractometer from Japan, with a Cu target, a Kα radiation source, λ = 1.5418 nm, a tube voltage of 40 kV, and a tube current of 40 mA. The weight loss process of the material was recorded on a German Netzsch STA 449 F3 thermogravimetric analyzer under a N2 atmosphere (20 mL min−1) and a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The sorbent was analyzed using a high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM), Zeiss sigma300 surface topography and structure, the acceleration voltage was 3 kV. The Raman analysis was done on a HORIBA Scientific LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer. At room temperature, the laser wavelength of 514 nm was used with the wavenumber range of 800–2000 cm−1. The adsorption and desorption isotherms of CO2 and N2 were measured using an adsorption instrument (ASAP 2460, Micromeritics Instrument Co., Ltd., USA). T the specific surface area was calculated according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (B–E–T) method. The pore volume (Vpore) and pore size (Dpore) distribution were calculated according to the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (B–J–H) formula. The number and strength of basic sites on the surface of the adsorbent were CO2 determined through temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD) on a chemisorption instrument (AutoChem II 2920, Micromeritics Instruments, Inc., USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Raman Spectroscopy of Charge Density Wave Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra were recorded on ScV6Sn6 samples with TCDW = 92 K using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 532 nm and a resolution of 1 cm−1 over the full range. The laser light was focused on a 2-μm spot using a window-corrected 63× objective. Samples were glued on the copper plate of a He flow cryostat (Konti Micro from CryoVac GMBH) using silver paint. Stokes and anti-stokes were simultaneously recorded and real temperature were check by fitting stokes and anti-stokes ratio using reffit software50 (https://reffit.ch/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Raman Spectroscopy Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra were measured using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Palaiseau, France). The collection parameters were as follows: excitation wavelength, 532 nm; laser power, 300 mW; range, 300–1800 cm−1; acquisition time, 60 s; and accumulation, 20 times. Background noise was removed and the baseline was adjusted using Labspec Spectrum 6 software (Horiba Jobin Yvon, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterizing Silicate Glass Structure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RAMAN spectrum was produced to assess information about the silicate structures of the material [23 (link)], with it being possible to observe the formation of non-bridged bonds (NBOs), confirm if the structure of the glass silicate formed in the material was similar to the expected structure for 58S BG, and verify if the incorporation of Sr ions was successful in the material’s network. The spectrum was collected using the LabRam HR Evolution spectrometer (HORIBA Scientific, Kyoto, Japan) grouped to an optical microscope with an Nd: Yag laser at 532 nm (laser power 100%), in a spectrum range of 200–1200 cm−1; three scans were taken with an acquisition time of 30 s and resolution of 600 µm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

UV-Vis and Photoluminescence Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Agilent CARY 5000 spectrophotometer was used to conduct the Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) absorption spectroscopy of the synthesized films. Steady-state PL spectra were gathered using a ~ 532 nm LASER source equipped with LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer from HORIBA Scientific.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!