The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

117 protocols using magnetom sonata

1

Cardiac MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrocardiography‐gated CMR imaging was performed in breath‐hold using a 1.5T Magnetom Siemens Sonata (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in line with the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations.14 Both cine and LGE short‐axis CMR images were prescribed every 10 mm (slice thickness, 6 mm) from base to apex. Cine CMR was performed using a steady‐state free precession sequence. LGE images were acquired on average 5 to 10 minutes after contrast administration, using segmented inversion recovery gradient echo sequence constantly adjusting inversion time.8 The contrast dose (gadodiamide or gadopentetate‐dimeglumine) was 0.15 mmol/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac MRI Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrocardiography-gated CMR imaging was performed in breath-hold using a 1.5T Magnetom Siemens Sonata (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) in line with the Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance recommendations.12 (link) Both cine and LGE short-axis CMR images were prescribed every 10 mm (slice thickness 6 mm) from base to apex. Cine CMR was performed using a steady-state free precession sequence. LGE images were acquired on average 5–10 min after contrast administration using segmented inversion recovery gradient echo sequence,13 (link) constantly adjusting inversion time.14 (link) The contrast dose (gadodiamide or gadopentetate-dimeglumine) was 0.15 mmol/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging Diagnostic for Ischemic Stroke

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI (3 T, Magnetom Trio or 1.5 T Siemens Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) or CT (Siemens, Sensation 64 or Somatom Definition AS+; Siemens Healthcare) was obtained in all patients. Patients who had a CT but no MRI were only included when a CT scan was available which was acquired more than 24 hours after stroke onset and clearly showed demarcation of the ischaemic infarct. In patients who had MRI only, the ischaemic lesion was delineated on diffusion-weighted imaging sequences on MRI performed <4 days after stroke onset and on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences on an MRI performed 4–7 days post stroke.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Protocol for Brain Scanning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Across all occasions the participants were scanned on the same 1.5T Siemens Magnetom Sonata scanner (Siemens Medical. Systems, Erlangen, Germany). DTI data were acquired in the axial plane using a single-shot echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with the following parameters: repetition time TR = 5400 ms, echo time TE = 97 ms; 6 gradient encoding directions with a b-value=1000 s/mm2, one image with no diffusion weighting (b = 0), 10 averages; voxel size = 1.8 × 1.8 × 3.0 mm3; distance factor = 0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal MRI Neuroimaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants underwent MRI scanning at the Core Facility MRI Neuroimaging, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, from 2005 to 2019, on three different scanners: 1.5T: 8-channel head coil; Siemens Magnetom Sonata (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) from 2005 to 2011; 3T General Electric (GE) Signa HDxt: 8-channel head coil from 2012 to 2014; 3T GE Discovery MR750: 32-channel head coil from 2015 to 2019. See Supplementary Note 1 for an overview of the T1-weighted MRI pulse sequences used for each dataset.
In Supplementary table 1, we have described each diagnostic group and their age and sex distributions for each scanner for the dataset used in the main analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaque Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracranial atherosclerotic plaque was analyzed using MR [17 (link)]. We used time-of-flight MRA to assess the intracranial vasculature of our patients. All imaging was performed using a 1.5 Tesla system (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens, Erlangen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Multimodal MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acquired MR sequences included MPRAGE, FLAIR, T1-weighted, T2-weigthed, diffusion weighted images (DWI), with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map reconstruction, and perfusion weighted images (PWI) with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) technique. MRI examinations were acquired on a 1.5 T (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and a 3 T scanner (Discovery MR750w; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, WI, USA). Patients underwent the following protocol: axial T1-weighted spin echo, axial T2-weighted fast spin echo, axial FLAIR; DWI acquired with three levels of diffusion sensitization (b-values 0, 500 and 1000); DSC acquired during contrast injection (DOTAREM.; dose 0.1 mmol/kg, injection rate 4 mL/s), followed by a 20-mL saline flush, based on T2*-weighted gradient-echo echo-planar; MPRAGE after administration of contrast. Perfusion parametric maps were obtained through a dedicated software package OleaSphere software version 3.0 (Olea Medical, La Ciotat, France). A rCBV map was generated by using an established tracer kinetic model applied to the first-pass data [20 (link)]. As previously described [21 (link)], the dynamic curves were mathematically corrected to reduce contrast agent leakage effects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive MRI Evaluation of Pancreatic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI was performed using a 1.5 T or 3.0 T clinical MR scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in one session. Axial T2-weighted as well as T1-weighted images with and without contrast agent (Magnevist, Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany) were acquired. In addition, MRCP images were acquired prior and after stimulation with secretin (Secrelux, Sanochemia, Neuss, Germany). All MRIs were independently reviewed by an experienced radiologist. Images were analysed for focal lesions in the morphological T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. The MRCP images were evaluated for filling defects, duct dilatation, stenoses or duct interruption. Lesions were classified as solid, cystic or indeterminate with or without connection to pancreatic ducts. They were measured in two dimensions and described according to shape, heterogeneity and location.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural MRI Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structural images of participants in cohort A were obtained from the ADNI database. Detailed information regarding the acquisition protocol is publicly available on the LONI website. The structural MRI data of participants from cohort B were acquired using a 3.0 T MRI scanner (Magnetom Sonata; Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany) or an integrated simultaneous 3.0 T time‐of‐flight PET/MR (SIGNA; GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). The structural MRI images (Siemens scanner) were obtained with a magnetisation‐prepared rapid gradient echo sequence: repetition time (TR) = 1900 ms, echo time (TE) = 2.2 ms, and number of slices = 176. The parameters for the structural images (GE scanner) were as follows: FOV = 256 × 256 mm2, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, gap = 0, number of slices = 192, TR = 6.9 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, inversion time (TI) = 450 ms, flip angle = 12°, and voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired with 1.5 Tesla scanners (Magnetom® Symphony, Magnetom® Avanto, and Magnetom® Sonata, all manufactured by Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) or 3 Tesla scanners (Ingenia®, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands; Magnetom® Skyra and Magnetom® Vida, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany). Since some MRI studies were acquired in external clinics, the scanners could not be traced for all included patients. Employed imaging protocols included non-enhanced axial T1-weighted (T1w NE) spin echo with flow compensation and non-contrast axial-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). After weight-adjusted injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (0.1 mmol/kg), contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted spin echo sequences with flow compensation or three-dimensional T1w gradient echo sequences were acquired (T1w CE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!