The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using kromasil

1

HPLC Analysis of VA_DE Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The VA_DE was analyzed as described in VA monograph with modifications [29 ]. For this purpose, a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Dionex Ultimate 3000 equipped with ultraviolet detection (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used in a reverse phase column (C-18, 250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5.0 µm; Kromasil, Akzo Nobel, Nashville, TN, USA). The sample was prepared as described on (Section 2.3.3) [29 ,31 (link)].
The flow rate used was 1.0 mL/min and the injected volume of 100 µL. The chromatographic peaks were determined at 325 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of MPA and MPAG in Plasma and Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma and tissue MPA and MPAG were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection [30 (link)]. Briefly, plasma and tissue homogenates were precipitated with acetonitrile, spiked with propafenone hydrochloride as an internal standard (50 μg/ml in sample). MPA and MPAG were determined using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). The HPLC conditions included a C18 column (150*4.6 mm; Kromasil, AkzoNobel, Sweden), isocratic mobile phase [46% methanol: 54% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (0.1%; pH 2.5)]. Analysis was performed under a 20 μl injection, solvent flow of 1.5 ml/min, total run time of 15 min per injection, and UV detection at 295 nm. The appropriate standard curves for MPA and MPAG were linear over the range of 0.5-100 μg/ml and 2.5-100 μg/ml, respectively.
Non-compartmental model (linear trapezoidal model) was used to calculate pre-dose concentration (C0), maximum concentration (Cmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 240 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Fruit Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A sample of 0.5 g of fruit from each treatment was ground in a pre-cooled mortar with 1 mL of precooling reagent that comprised petroleum ether; the sample was then transferred to a new tube for ultrasound extraction for 40 min and centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min. Supernatant was extracted, and residues were treated with 0.5 mL petroleum ether, before ultrasound extraction for 20 min and centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min. Two supernatants were combined and dried using N2, diluted to fixed volume (0.5 mL) with methanol, and then the solution was filtered into a sample bottle. The HPLC (L-3000, Rigol, Beijing, China) liquid phase used a chromatographic column C18 (4.6 nm × 250 mm × 5 μm, Kromasil, AKZO NOBEL, Västra Götaland, Sweden), and the mobile phase conditions comprised 80:20 ratio of acetonitrile to 0.1% phosphoric acid, 204 nm wave length, and a column temperature of 30 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Quantification of Rap and DiI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative determination of Rap was performed by using an HPLC system consisting of separations modules (Waters® e2695), a UV detector (Waters® e2489), and a data station (Empower® 3), which were purchased from Waters® Corporation (Milford, MA, USA). Rap was separated by using a C18 Column (Kromasil®, 5 μm, 4.6×250 mm; Akzo Nobel, Bohus, Sweden) with acetonitrile and water (75:25, v/v) as a mobile phase delivered at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column temperature was set to 40 °C.31 (link) Rap was detected at 277 nm, with an injection volume of 50 μL. The amount of DiI was separately quantified by using the same HPLC system with a fluorescence detector (Waters® W2475). Chromatography was carried out on a C18 Column (Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) with 0.05 M dimethyl sulfate and methanol (2:98, v/v) as a mobile phase. The excitation and emission wavelengths were set at 549 and 565 nm, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Purification of Chiral Stationary Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographically pure eremomycin amide and (adamantyl-2) eremomycin amide were provided by the Gause Institute of New Antibiotics (Moscow, Russia). Chloreremomycin was isolated from the cultural liquid provided by JSC «Biohimik» (Saransk, Russia) and purified using preparative reversed-phase HPLC.
5 µm silica (Kromasil, Akzo Nobel, Sweden) with a specific surface area of 313 m2/g and pore diameter of 11 nm was used as a matrix for CSPs synthesis. Pure 3-glycidoxypropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA) was used to activate silica with epoxy-functional groups.
An amino acid standard kit was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Chromatographically pure methanol and acetonitriles were obtained from Panreac (Spain). Glacial acetic acid (pure for chemical analysis, Vekton, Moscow, Russia), ultrapure phosphotic acid, pure 25% ammonium hydroxide (both from Khimmed, Moscow, Russia), triethylamine (pure, Sigma-Aldrich, CIIIA), ultrapure perchloric acid (Reakhim, Moscow, Russia), and pure for analysis sodium dihydrophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, CIIIA) were used as buffers and additives to eluents. Deionized water was purified by the Werner system (Leverkusen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phytochemical Analysis of Viscum album

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were conducted using an HPLC Dionex Ultimate 3000, equipped with a photodiode array (PAD) detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) connected with LCQ Fleet Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The sample was prepared according to V. album monograph from French Pharmacopoeia (ANSM, 2010 ): in a 20.0 mL volumetric flask, 8.0 g of each tincture was diluted to 20.0 mL of a mixture of 10 volumes of acetonitrile and 90 volumes of trifluoroacetic acid (0.05 per cent v/v).
Separations were performed on a reverse-phase column (C-18, 250 mm × 4, 6 mm × 5.0 μm; Kromasil, Akzo Nobel). Water-formic acid 0.1% v/v (A) and acetonitrile (B) were used as mobile phases, as follows: (i) 0–20 min, 10% B, (ii) 20–25 min, 10–15% B, (iii) 25–45 min, 15% B, (iv) 45–50 min, 15–100% B, (v) 50–55 min 100% B, (vi) 55–57 min 100–10%, and (vii) 57–70 min 10% B. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the injection volume was 20 µL. Absorption UV–VIS spectra were recorded on PDA-detector (with a total spectral range between 100 nm and 400 nm), set at detection wavelength 220 nm, simultaneously. Mass spectra were recorded in positive ion mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Chlorogenic Acid by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of chlorogenic acid from the permeation studies was evaluated by HPLC-DAD. The separation was performed in a reverse phase column (C-18, 250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5.0 µm; Kromasil, Akzo Nobel, Nashville, TN, USA) in an HPLC-equipped with: ultimate 3000 pump LPG; auto sampler WPS-3000 TSL; columns compartment TCC-3000 SD and diode array detector (DAD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, São Paulo, Brazil). Water-formic acid 0.1% v/v (A) and acetonitrile-formic acid 0.1% v/v (B) were used as mobile phases in the gradient mode: (i) 0–20 min, 10% B; (ii) 21–26 min, 100% B; (iii) 27–37 min, 10% B. The flow rate used was 1.0 mL/min and the injected volume of 70 µL. The detection was performed at 325 nm [29 ,31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative HPLC Analysis of Milk Fat Hydrolysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Milk fat hydrolysis was monitored by determination of lipid classes following a procedure adapted from Tan and Brzuskiewicz [43 (link)] in a HPLC (Pump LC-20at, Degasser DGU-20A5 and communicator module CBM-20A; Shimadzu®, Japan) (Figure S1). Samples were dissolved in an injection solution, composed of acetonitrile:isopropanol:hexane (2:2:1, v/v/v) and a reversed-phase HPLC column (C18, 5 µm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, Kromasil®; AkzoNobel®, Sweden) was used. The lipid analytes were eluted with a mobile phase gradient of acetonitrile (A) and isopropanol (B), at 1.0 mL/min, from 0 to 69% B from 0 to 60 min, followed by re-equilibration until 0% B, from 60 to 76 min (Table S1). The eluate was monitored with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD-LT II; Shimadzu®, Japan), using N2 as nebulizer gas at 0.65 mL/min, and drift tube temperature at 40 °C. Lipid classes of TAGs-DAGs and FFAs-MAGs were identified comparing with commercial standards and quantified by internal normalization. Results were expressed in g/100 g of total lipids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), diethylether, dichloromethane (DCM) and Fmoc-PEG1-OH were purchased from Merck. Fmoc-protected D-amino acids (Fmoc-AAs) were purchased from GL Biochem Ltd (Shanghai, China). TentaGel S amino resin was purchased from Rapp Polymere. α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) was purchased from Bruker. EZ-Link NHS-Biotin reagent was purchased from Thermo Scientific. hCAII (Aldrich), hCAI (Aldrich), hCAVB, hCAIX and hCAXII (Sinobiological Inc.) were purchased from commercial sources. Unless otherwise specified, chemicals were purchased from Aldrich. MALDI-MS and MS/MS spectra were obtained using ultrafleXtreme™ TOF/TOF (Bruker). Microwave-assisted CNBr-based cleavage reactions were performed by a household microwave oven (model R-248J, 800 W, 2450 MHz) from Sharp Inc. The PEAKS software was purchased from Bioinformatics Solutions Inc. The purification of bulk peptides was done by a preparative HPLC system from Gilson on a C18 reversed phase preparative column (Kromasil® from AkzoNobel, 5 μm, 250 × 30 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!