The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

80 protocols using mc1000

1

Characterizing Morphology of Carbon Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scanning electron microscopy (EVO 18, Zeiss, Germany) was utilized to observe and assess the morphology of the CNFs. The accelerating voltage of SEM was 10 kV. And the detector was secondary electron. The samples were dropped onto the mica plate after dilution. And it was coated with a layer of gold in vacuum atmosphere using an ion sputter (Hitachi, MC1000) after drying at room temperature overnight to ensure its electrical conductivity before testing. Thickness of the gold on the samples was around 30 nm. The SEM images were applied to measure the lengths and diameters of the CNFs by using Nano-Measurer 1.2 software. For each CNF sample, one thousand and five hundred fibers from different SEM pictures were used to evaluate their lengths and widths. Lengths and widths of the fibers were measured manually. Lines were carried out along the actual shape of the CNFs to measure their lengths with the utilization of Nano-Measurer 1.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Freeze-Drying and SEM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ApoV-HS and PBS-HS were compressed and injected into DI (1 mL) in an Eppendorf tube. After 10 min, ApoV-HS and PBS-HS were hydrated, frozen at − 80 °C overnight, and then subjected to lyophilization for 30 h using a − 80 °C freeze drier. The freeze-dried PBS-HS and apoV-HS were sprayed with gold by Sputter Coater (MC1000, Hitachi, Japan) for electric conduction, and observed by Scanning electron microscope (SEM, Quanta200, Thermo Fisher, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized SEM Imaging of Deposited Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), deposited glass slides (Lab-Tek and Shell-vial 12 mm) were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M of sodium cacodylate buffer for 60 min. Slides were rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and distilled water for 1 minute each. Slides were dehydrated with increasing ethanol solutions (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%) for 2 minutes and with 100% ethanol for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with 100% ethanol/100% hexamethyldisilazane (HDMS) in a 1:2 ratio for 5 minutes. Slides were incubated with 100% of HDMS for 5 minutes and air-dried for 30 min. We checked that no particles had been lost after this virus preparation (dehydration and drying) for SEM (not shown). Finally, the slides were platinum sputter-coated for 20 s at 10 mA (Hitachi MC1000). The observation was made using a SU5000 (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) SEM with an SE detector in high-vacuum mode at 1 kV acceleration voltage, observation mode (spot size 30). The working distance ranged between 1 mm and 5 mm. For quantification, automatic 6 × 6 mosaic tiled images at ×5k magnification were acquired at a random position with auto contrast/brightness using the microscope zig-zag function after manual adjustment of the focus and no further auto-focus. Pixel size was 3.96 nm. Images were 1280 × 960 pixels corresponding to 5078 × 3808 nm fields of view.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation of Nanomembrane Samples for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strips of BP membranes were cut using a laser cutter. The strips were first immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 5 hours to fix the structure. The strips were then immersed in water-ethanol solutions of ascending fractions of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90, 95, and 100 volume % twice) to replace water in the strips with ethanol. The ethanol-soaked strips were dried in a freeze-dryer (Autosamdri-815A, Tousimis). The dried samples were coated with platinum using a sputter coater (Hitachi MC1000) and observed in a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi SU3500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy Preparation of Water Spinach Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM preparation: fresh leaves of water spinach were cut into squares of about 1cm2 and immediately put into the electron microscope fixing solution for 2h. The fixed samples were rinsed with 0.1M PB (pH 7.4) for 3 times, 15 min each. The tissue blocks were transferred to 1% OsO4 and placed at 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 1-2 hours. After that, the tissue blocks were washed three times at 0.1M PB (pH 7.4) for 15 min each. The dehydration was performed using a graded series of alcohol-isoamyl acetate concentrations for 15 minutes each. The samples were put into the critical point dryer (Quorum K850) for drying and sputter-coated with gold for 30s by lon sputtering apparatus (Hitachi MC1000). Finally, the images were observed under the scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, SU8100) (Pathan et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Leukocyte Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leukocytes (1×106 cells mL-1) from the head kidney on circular coverslips were stimulated with PMA (100 ng mL-1), E. coli, E.tarda, or S. aureus (1×108 CFU mL-1) for 3 h respectively, and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Hushi, Shanghai, China) at 4 °C in the dark for 2 h. Next, the samples were dehydrated by adding ethanol (Hushi, Shanghai, China) by a graded series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%) for 15 min of each at room temperature. Samples were treated with isoamyl acetate (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo, USA) for 20 min, subjected to critical point drying for 3 h (Hitachi-HCP, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), coated with gold (MC1000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and viewed under SEM (S-3400N, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Grapefruit Peel Microscopy Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We referenced Casado et al.’s method [49 (link)] for sample preparation and made improvements. At the equator of the grapefruit, we used a blade to trim the waxy peel to about 2 mm × 2 mm × 1 mm, and fixed the peel in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. The samples were dried with a critical point dryer (Autosamdri-815A, Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA) and attached by a conductive tape to a sampling table. A gold particle was coated with Hitachi MC1000 and examined with a Hitachi SU8020 field emission scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Morphological Analysis of L. leichtlinii Petals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological characteristics of L. leichtlinii var. maximowiczii petals were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Samples were handled according to Salehi et al. [52 (link)] with minor modifications. The fresh petals and spots from the four stages were dissected at approximately 5 mm, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature for 2 h, and then washed five times for 10 min each in phosphate buffer (0.1 M), pH 7.4. Afterward, the samples were dehydrated by washing in a series of ethanol solutions [2 × 50% (30 min), 75% (30 min), 90% (30 min), 95% (30 min), and 2 × 100% ethanol (30 min)]. Then, the samples were put in isoamyl acetate for 20 min and critical point dried in an HCP-2 Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan) equipment, wherein they were placed first in a 50–80% liquid carbon dioxide (L-CO2) at 10 °C for 20 min, and then at 40 °C for 5 min. For coating with 10 nm of gold, the dried samples were placed in metal stubs and placed in an ion sputter (MC1000, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). A scanning electron microscope (SU8100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used for observations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scaffold Pore Size Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scaffolds were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8100, HITACHI, Hitachi, Japan) after lyophilization (K850, Quorum, East Sussex, UK) and gold/palladium sputter-coating (MC1000, HITACHI, Hitachi, Japan). The pore size of the printed scaffolds was calculated using the ImageJ software (V1.8.0, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA); three images were selected for each sample, and five pores were measured for each image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ectomycorrhizal Fungi Mediate Pb Transformation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to assess the Pb transformation by ectomycorrhizal fungi, co-culture of Pb shots (4 mm in diameter) and ectomycorrhizal fungi was carried out in Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) containing MMN solid medium. The Pb shots were autoclaved and evenly placed on the MMN solid medium, while a block of ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelia taken from the edge of a growing colony was placed on the surface of the MMN solid medium. Dishes that received only Pb shots were used as controls. The Petri dishes were incubated at 25°C in darkness for 2 months.
The elemental composition of secondary minerals formed on the Pb shot surface was analyzed with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, AMETEK, United States). Images of secondary minerals on the Pb shot surface were obtained after the Pb shots were sprayed with gold/palladium using an ion sputter (MC1000, Hitachi, Japan) and then used for SEM analysis by a field emission scanning electron microscope (S-4800, Hitachi, Japan).
The composition of secondary minerals generated on the Pb shot surface was determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Zhao et al., 2020 (link)). Mineral phases were identified according to International Centre for Diffraction Data Powder Diffraction File (PDF-4 release 2010).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!