The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using empower3 software suite

1

Quantifying Amino Acids and Polyamines in Yeast Conditioned Media

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Additional amino acids and polyamines quantification in yeast conditioned medium was done by fluorescent labeling using AccQ-TagTM (Waters) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting derivatives were on Acquity BEH C18 column (150 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) connected to an Acquity H-class UPLC system and quantified by fluorescence detection (Acquity FLR detector, Waters, excitation: 250 nm, emission: 395 nm) using ultrapure standards (Sigma-Aldrich). The column was heated to 42°C and equilibrated with 5 column volumes of buffer A (140 mM sodium acetate pH 6.3, 7 mM triethanolamine) at a flow rate of 0.45 ml per minute. Gradual increase of acetonitrile (B) in buffer A was set up as follows: 1 min 8% B, 16 min 18% B, 23 min 40% B, 26.3 min 80% B, hold for 5 min, and return to 8% B in 3 min. Data acquisition and processing were performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC-UV Analysis of Fenofibrate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters HPLC-UV system (Waters Corp, Milford, MA), equipped with a Luna 5um C18 100Å column (Phenomenex, US), was used to detect fenofibrate at a wavelength of 286 nm. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and phosphoric acid in water (pH=2.5) at a ratio of 85:15 (v/v). The flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 μL. The observed retention time of fenofibrate was 6 min. The data was acquired and processed using Waters Empower 3 software suite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Free Amino Acids and Nucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free amino acids were extracted from 1 × 106 cells with 0.2 ml of 0.1 M HCl in an ultrasonic ice-bath for 10 min. The resulting extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C and 16.400 g to remove cell debris. Amino acids were derivatized with AccQ-Tag reagent (Waters) and determined as described in [44 (link)]. For determination of nucleotide concentrations, the extracts were derivatized with chloroacetaldehyde as described in [45 (link)] and separated by reversed phase chromatography on an Acquity HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) connected to an Acquity H-class UPLC system. Prior separation, the column was heated to 43°C and equilibrated with 5 column volumes of buffer A (5.7 mM TBAS, 30.5 mM KH2PO4 pH 5.8) at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min-1. Separation of adenosine derivates was achieved by increasing the concentration of buffer B (2/3 acetonitrile in 1/3 buffer A) in buffer A as follows: 1 min 1% B, 2 min 8% B, 3.2 min 14% B, 9.5 min 50% B, and return to 1% B in 1.5 min. The separated derivates were detected by fluorescence (Acquity FLR detector, Waters, excitation: 280 nm, emission: 410 nm) and quantified using ultrapure standards (Sigma). Data acquisition and processing was performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Ketoconazole Powder Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters 600 binary pump, Waters 2489 UV/detector, and Waters 717 plus autosampler (Waters Technologies Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) were the components of the HPLC system. The stationary phase of the column was a Waters Symmetry shield C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, reversed phase). The mobile phase was acetonitrile: 20 mmol phosphate buffer (pH 4.0) (55:45, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min [33 (link)]. KPR was analyzed at a wavelength of 256 nm and retention time was 5.2 min. Linearity was determined from 1 to 100 μg/ml and the regression coefficient obtained is ≥ 0.998. The powder of the physical mixtures was analyzed (n=5) by dissolving weighed samples in 20 mL of acetonitrile. The contents of the mini-tablets were analyzed by dissolving the tablets (n=10) in the mobile phase and pre-filtering the samples through a 0.45-μm membrane to extract the drug prior to HPLC injection. Similarly, the samples obtained from the dissolution studies were filtered and injected at a volume of 20 μL. The data were acquired and processed using the Waters Empower 3 software suite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Weight Estimation of HA and SAgAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relative molecular weight of the HA and of the SAgAs was estimated using a Waters (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) 2695 Separation Module with column heater set at 25 °C, and samples were detected using Waters 2414 refractive index detector and Waters 2489 UV/Vis and injection volume of 50 μl. A tandem column setup of two Agilent (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) Aquagel-OH 40 columns (Agilent) was used at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/minute with isocratic elution in 0.1 mol/l ammonium acetate buffer pH 5.0 with 0.25 mol/l NaCl for 45 minutes. Analysis was completed using Empower 3 software suite (Waters Corp., Milford, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Quantification of Drug Dissolution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SC content in dissolution samples was analyzed using a Waters (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system equipped with an autosampler, UV detector and a Phenomenex® Luna 5μ C18 (150 × 4.6 mm) column. An isocratic mode of elution with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and water (60:40) at a flow rate of 1.0ml/min. was employed to quantify the drug at a wavelength of 273 nm. The data was acquired and processed using Waters Empower 3 software suite.19
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Amino Acid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non‐thiol‐containing amino acids were quantified after specific labeling with the fluorescence dye AccQ‐TagTM (Waters) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The resulting derivatives were separated by reversed phase chromatography on an Acquity BEH C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) connected to an Acquity H‐class UPLC system and quantified by fluorescence detection (Acquity FLR detector, Waters). The column was heated to 42°C and equilibrated with 5 column volumes of buffer A (140 mM sodium acetate pH 6.3, 7 mM triethanolamine) at a flow rate of 0.45 ml min−1. Baseline separation of amino acid derivates was achieved by increasing the concentration of acetonitrile (B) in buffer A as follows: 1 min 8% B, 7 min 9% B, 7.3 min 15% B, 12.2 min 18% B, 13.1 min 41% B, 15.1 min 80% B, hold for 2.2 min, and return to 8% B in 1.7 min. Data acquisition and processing was performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters). Cys was determined after labeling with monobromobimane (Calbiochem) as described before (Wirtz et al., 2004).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Malate Shuttle Metabolite Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the malate shuttle-associated metabolites, we adapted a previously published method52 (link). In brief, 106 cells were extracted in 100 µl ice-cold methanol with sonication on ice. For derivatization, 50 µl extract was mixed with 25 µl 140 mM 3-nitrophenylhydrazine hydrochloride, 25 µl methanol and 100 µl 50 mM ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride, and incubated for 20 min at 60 °C. Samples were separated by reversed-phase chromatography on an Acquity H-class UPLC system coupled to a QDa mass detector (Waters) with an Acquity HSS T3 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 µm, Waters), which was heated to 40 °C. Separation of derivatives was achieved by increasing the concentration of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) in 0.1% formic acid in water (A) at 550 µl min−1 as follows: 2 min 15% B, 2.01 min 31% B, 5 min 54% B, 5.01 min 90% B, hold for 2 min and return to 15% B in 2 min. Mass signals for the following compounds were detected in single ion record mode by using negative detector polarity and 0.8 kV capillary voltage: malate (403.3 m/z; 25 V CV), succinate (387.3 m/z; 25 CV), fumarate (385.3 m/z; 30 V), citrate (443.3 m/z; 10 V), pyruvate (357.3 m/z; 15 V) and α-ketoglutarate (550.2 m/z; 25 CV). Data acquisition and processing were performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of Branched-Chain Keto-Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the content of branched-chain α-ketoacids, 100 μl of yeast conditioned medium was mixed with 200 μl cold 1M perchloric acid. Insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation, 150 μl of the resulting supernatant were mixed with an equal volume of 25 mM o-phenylendiamine solution and derivatized by incubation at 50°C for 30 min. After centrifugation the derivatized keto-acids were separated by reversed phase chromatography on an Acquity HSS T3 column (100 mm x 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) connected to an Acquity H-class UPLC system. Prior to separation, the column was heated to 40°C and equilibrated with 5 column volumes of solvent A (0.1% formic acid in 10% acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 0.55 ml/min. Separation of ketoacid derivates was achieved by increasing the concentration of solvent B (acetonitrile) in solvent A as follows: 2 min 2% B, 5 min 18% B, 5.2 min 22% B, 9 min 40% B, 9.1min 80% B and hold for 2 min, then return to 2% B in 2 min. The separated derivatives were detected by fluorescence (Acquity FLR detector, Waters, excitation: 350 nm, emission: 410 nm). Data acquisition and processing were performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of TCA Cycle Intermediates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TCA cycle intermediates were quantified in MCEC treated with 2 mM acetoacetate or 2 mM D‐β‐hydroxybutyrate (Sigma‐Aldrich) or the respective controls for 24 h. Samples were extracted in methanol with sonication and the separation protocol was adapted from Uran et al (2007 (link)). In brief, samples were analyzed on an Acquity HSS T3 column (Waters) heated to 40°C connected to an Acquity H‐class UPLC system (Waters). The UPLC system was coupled to a QDa mass detector (Waters) in single ion record mode, using negative detector polarity and 0.8 kV capillary voltage. Data acquisition and processing was performed with the Empower3 software suite (Waters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!