The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using α amylase

1

Chromatographic Separation and Enzymatic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Column chromatography was carried out using Merck Kieselgel PF254 silica gel, Art. No. 1.07734.1000. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was done using Merck DC-Plasticfolie TLC plastic sheet pre-coated with Kieselgel 60 PF (Darmstadt, Germany). Dimethylsulfoxide, hexane, chloroform, acetone, methanol, water, acetonitrile, formic acid, acarbose were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). All solvents used for LC-MS/MS analysis were HPLC grade; others were analytical grade. The DPP-4 inhibitory screening kit was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). α-Amylase was purchased from Megazyme (County Wicklow, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromatographic Separation and Bioactivity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Column chromatography (CC) was carried out using silica gel Merck Kieselgel PF254 Art. No. 1.07734.1000 and silica gel Merck Kieselgel PF254 Art. No. 9385.1000. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using Merck DC-Plasticfolie TLC plastic sheet pre-coated with Kiecelgel 60 PF (Merck, Kenilworth, NJ). Acarbose, dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), ascorbic acid, α-tocopherol, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), hexane, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), chloroform (CHCl3), methanol (MeOH), and deuterated solvents (chloroform and acetone) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). α-Amylase was purchased from Megazyme (Co. Wicklow, Ireland). DPP-4 inhibitory screening kit was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phenolic Standards Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenolic standards chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, isoferulic acid, rutin, protocatechuic acid, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and p-coumaric acid, all other chemicals and HPLC-grade organic reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Wicklow, Ireland).
The enzymes α-amylase, protease and amyloglucosidase were purchased from Megazyme (Wicklow, Ireland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Nutrient Analysis of Dairy Rations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dry matter content of each ration was detected after drying at 135°C for 3 h, and the ash content was detected following combustion at 550°C for 6 h according to the protocols of the AOAC [26 ]. The Kjeldahl method [27 (link)] was used to determine the levels of crude protein (CP, 6.25×N) using an automated nitrogen analyzer (FOSS, DK-3400 Hillerød, Denmark). The total starch content in the TMR was determined via an enzymatic method (α-amylase and amyloglucosidase) using a commercial kit (Megazyme, Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Bray, Ireland). To analyze the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, heat-stable α-amylase (Sigma A3306; Sigma–Aldrich, Shanghai, China) and sodium sulfite were used according to the methods previously established by Van Soest et al. [27 (link)]. The total calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) levels were determined according to the National Measurement Principles of China (GB/T 5009.92–2003 and GB/T 5009.87–2003, respectively). The dietary lysine to methionine ratio (Lys: Met) and the net energy for lactation (NEL) of each ration were estimated based on the included ingredients using the Cornell-Penn-Miner Dairy (CPM-Dairy, version 3.0.8.1) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chokeberry Pomace Powder Extrusion Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extrusion trials were performed using commercial chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) pomace powder (CPP) (Aronia Original Naturprodukte GmbH, Dresden, Germany) [20 (link)]. Chemicals and reagents of analytical purity grade were obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), unless stated otherwise. Amyloglucosidase (E-AMGDFPD, from Aspergillus niger, 36,000 U/g), α-amylase (E-PANAA, from pig pancreas 100,000 U/g), protease (E-BSPRPD from Bacillus licheniformis 9000 U/g), Celite 545 and endo-arabinanase (EC 3.2.1.99, from A. niger, 9 U/mg) were from Megazyme (Bray, Ireland) and Amberlite FPA53 and Ambersep 200 from Rohm and Haas Europe (Frankfurt, Germany). Thermostable α-amylase (Thermamyl 120 L, EC 3.2.1.1, from B. licheniformis, 120 KNU/g), protease (Alcalase 2.5 L, EC 3.4.21.62, from B. licheniformis, 2.5 AU/g), and Amyloglucosidase (AMG 300 L, EC 3.2.1.3, from A. niger, 300 AGU/g) were a gift from Novozymes, (Bagsværd, Denmark). Rotihydroquant C5 and D used for Karl Fischer titration as well as cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (≥96%), cyanidin chloride (≥97%), 5-caffeoylquinic acid (≥97%), quercetin-3-O-glucoside (≥99%), and quercetin dihydrate (≥99%) used as PP standards were obtained from Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany). Ultrapure water was used for all experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Alcohol Insoluble Residue Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alcohol insoluble residue (AIR) was prepared as described by Fry (1988) with modifications. A total of 100 mg of ground stem material was incubated in phenol for 30 min at room temperature while shaking, followed by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was washed with the following solutions: twice with chloroform: methanol (1 : 1, v/v), twice with 80% (v/v) methanol, and once with 100% methanol. The pellets were left to dry overnight at room temperature. The samples were destarched by amylase treatment and 20 mg were suspended in 2 ml of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), 1 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% NaN3. This suspension was heated at 95°C and the starch was allowed to gelatinize for 30 s before 1 U ml−1 thermostable α‐amylase (Megazyme, Leinster, Ireland). The suspension was incubated at 85°C for 15 min then cooled to 25°C before 10 U ml−1 amyloglucosidase and 1 U ml−1 pullulanase (Megazyme) were added. This solution was incubated for 16 h at 25°C with continuous shaking at 500 rpm. The suspension was centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 g and the supernatant was removed. The pellet was washed with 2 ml 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.5), 1 mM CaCl2, 0.05% NaN3, centrifuged at 6000 g and the supernatant was discarded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Starch Quantification via Enzymatic Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Starch was measured according to do Amaral et al. (2007) and Arenque et al. (2014) (link). AIR was treated with 120 U⋅ mL–1 of α-amylase (E.C. 3.2.1.1) of Bacillus licheniformis (Megazyme® Inc., Australia) diluted in 10 mM MOPS buffer pH 6.5 at 75°C for 1 h. Incubation was followed by the addition of 30 U⋅ mL–1 of amyloglucosidase (E.C. 3.2.1.3) of Aspergillus niger (Megazyme® Inc., Australia) diluted in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.5 at 50°C for 1 h. For starch determination, 50 μL of each sample was added to a 250 μL of a mixture containing glucose oxidase (1,100 U⋅ mL–1), peroxidase (700 U⋅ mL–1), 4-aminoantipirin (290 μmol⋅ L–1), and 50 mM phenol at pH 7.5. The plates were incubated for 15 min at 30°C, and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm. The standard curve was performed with commercial glucose (Sigma®).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Starch Analysis of Water Caltrops

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water caltrops (Trapa taiwanensis Nakai) were cultivated and harvested in Tainan, Taiwan. The α-amylase, amyloglucosidase, amylose kit, and damaged starch kit were purchased from Megazyme (Megazyme International Ireland, Co. Wicklow, Ireland). All chemical substances applied in this study were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Determination of Total Starch Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total starch content was determined according to AACC approved method 76−13.01 [54 ] using a kit purchased from Megazyme International (Bray, Wicklow, Ireland) (100/100 tests per kit). Each of the wheat flour samples (~100 mg, accurately weighed), over which 0.2 mL of 80% (v/v) ethanol aqueous solution was added in order to moisten the samples and to help upon dispersal, were transferred to culture tubes. The tubes were agitated using a vortex mixer. Immediately, the samples were treated with sodium acetate buffer solution (100 mM, pH 5.0) and 3 mL each of thermostable α-amylase from Megazyme. The tubes were incubated in boiling water for 6 min, and then vigorously shaken after 2, 4 and 6 min to ensure complete homogeneity of the suspensions. Tubes containing 0.1 mL of amyloglucosidase (20 U) from the Megazyme kit were incubated in a water bath at 50 °C for 30 min. The transferred samples were diluted to 100 mL with distilled water and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, and then the supernatant (clear, undiluted filtrate) was retained for analysis. To determine D-glucose, samples were treated with a glucose oxidase assay kit (GOPOD) from Megazyme and the absorbance was recorded at 340 nm on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 3600, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Thai Rice Cultivars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two white rice cultivars, Jasmin rice grains (KDML105 cultivar with 16.9 % amylose content) and Chai-Nat1 rice grains (CN1 cultivar with 29.35% amylose content), were obtained from Upon Ratchathani province, Thailand. The crude protein, fat, and total starch of KDML105 rice were 7.29, 0.89, and 73.76% (w/w), respectively, while CN1 has a corresponding crude protein, fat, and total starch of 7.39, 1.25, and 71.44% (w/w). α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1., 3,000 U/g), amyl glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.3., 3,300 U/mL) and glucose oxidase peroxidase (GOPOD) kit were obtained from Megazyme International, Ireland Ltd. Other chemicals used were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!