The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsm 710 nlo laser scanning confocal microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The LSM 710 NLO is a laser scanning confocal microscope manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed for high-resolution imaging of biological samples. The microscope utilizes a multi-photon excitation technique to enable deep tissue imaging with reduced phototoxicity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using lsm 710 nlo laser scanning confocal microscope

1

Immunofluorescent Staining of Differentiated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated cells were fixed for 30 min with 4% paraformaldehyde, and blocked with 5% normal goat serum and 1% BSA in 0.2% Triton X-100 for 45 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in 5% normal goat serum and incubated with the samples overnight at 4°C. The appropriate fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies were applied for 2 h at room temperature. The nuclei were counter stained with 4, 6-diamidinodiamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 10 mg/ml, Life Technologies). Negative control (omit primary antibody) was included in all immunofluorescent staining. Immuno labeled cells were viewed and counted using Zeiss LSM 710 NLO laser scanning confocal microscope (Jena, Germany). The percentage of MAP-2/TH/DAPI positive cells was calculated within 10 randomly selected visual fields. The following primary antibodies were used: 1:500 rabbit anti-TH (Millipore, AB5935), 1:500 mouse anti-MAP2 (Abcam, ab11267) 1:200 goat anti-GIRK2 (Abcam, ab65096). The secondary antibodies were as follows: Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (1:400, ab150113, Abcam), Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-goat (1:400, ab150129, Abcam) and Alexa fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit (1:400, ab150080, Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing MMP-14 in MDA-MB-231 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA‐MB‐231 cells (1.5 × 104) were seeded onto Matrigel‐coated glass coverslips and cultured for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS at 37 °C. After two washes with PBS, cells were cultured with or without κE (50 μg·mL−1) for 6 or 24 h in DMEM without FCS, then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in blocking solution (PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin). Cells were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with MMP‐14 primary antibody (rabbit anti‐human MMP‐14 antibody, clone EP1264Y, GeneTex), washed and stained for 30 min at room temperature with goat anti‐rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 568 and Hoescht reagent. Finally, they were mounted in FluorSave Reagent (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and examined using an LSM710 NLO laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Axio Observer). Emitted fluorescence was detected through the use of the appropriate filter set, and representative images from three separate experiments were treated and merged with imagej software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing RGLG3 and RGLG4 Localization in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full-length RGLG3 and RGLG4 were amplified by PCR, and each was cloned into pRTL-GFP, generating a construct expressing an N-terminal GFP fusion protein. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplast preparation, transfection and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 1mg/ml; Sigma, USA) staining were performed as described (He et al., 2011b (link)). Confocal imaging was performed with a Zeiss LSM 710 NLO laser scanning confocal microscope (excitation 488nm; emission 505–550nm). Expression of GFP alone (from the control pRTL-GFP), GFP-RGLG3 and GFP-RGLG4 was confirmed by western blotting using anti-GFP (Abcam, Germany) as the primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Promega, USA) as the secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Determination of Photosynthetic Pigments in Tomato Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 0.02 g fresh leaf samples collected from the 2nd leaf of six-leaf-stage tomato seedlings were immersed in 10 ml 80% (v/v) acetone in the dark for 24 h until leaves were completely bleached. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured, respectively, at 645, 663, and 470 nm, then chlorophyll a/b and carotenoids content were calculated. The photosynthetic pigment content was calculated as described (Arnon, 1949 (link)). Three biological replicates and three technical replicates for each leaf sample were measured. To determine chlorophyll auto-fluorescence, the 2nd leaf of six-leaf-stage tomato seedlings was examined with LSM710nlo laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein-Protein Interaction Imaging in Tobacco

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3103 was co-transformed with MORF8-eYNE and WTG1-eYCE, or MORF9-eYNE and WTG1-eYCE. The MORF2-eYNE and WTG1-eYCE combination was used as the negative control, whereas the MORF2-eYNE and MORF9-eYCE combination was used as the positive control. Each combination was introduced into A. tumefaciens strain GV3103 by electroporation. The transformants were then used to infiltrate Nicotiana benthamiana leaves as described previously (Waadt and Kudla, 2008 (link)). After 48 h, the infiltrated leaves were subjected to confocal imaging analysis using an LSM 710 NLO laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Intracellular Calcium Imaging Using Fluo-4 AM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fifty micrograms of fluo4-AM dye (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was dissolved in pluronic acid and 20% DMSO (Life Technologies) via sonication before being resuspended in M199-supplemented growth media. Cells were incubated with the dye for 1 hour and imaged using a LSM 710 NLO laser-scanning, confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmblt, Jena, Germany) at a 20× objective. All experiments were conducted at room temperature and in the absence of external electrical stimulation. Images were processed using ImageJ (v.1.49, NIH, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!