The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Standard conditioning chamber

Manufactured by Harvard Apparatus
Sourced in United States

The Standard Conditioning Chamber is a versatile piece of lab equipment designed for behavioral research. It provides a controlled environment for conducting various conditioning experiments. The chamber features a clear acrylic enclosure, allowing for observation of the subject's behavior during the experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using standard conditioning chamber

1

Auditory Fear Conditioning and Extinction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For auditory fear conditioning (day 1), mice were placed in a standard conditioning chamber (Coulbourn Instruments, USA). After a 3-min habituation, mice received six tones (3000 Hz, 80 dB, 30 s) at 2-min intervals that co-terminated with an electrical shock (0.5 mA, 1 s). On day 2, mice were positioned in an acrylic cylinder (diameter, 23 cm). After a 3-min acclimation period, mice received 20 tones at 40-s intervals to acquire fear extinction. Each tone was coupled with stimulation by blue laser (wavelength, 473 nm) illumination, delivered as 10-Hz, 20-ms pulses. Laser power (~1 mW for IL somata stimulation and ~4 mW for BLA projection stimulation) was measured at the tip of the fiberoptic cannula. For experiments employing stimulation without extinction training, optic stimulation was presented without tones. The next day, mice were placed in the same context as used for extinction training, and retrieval of extinction was tested. After 3 min, two tones were presented at 40-s intervals without optic stimulation. The behavior of mice throughout all procedures was recorded as a video file and analyzed for freezing behavior and locomotor activity using FreezeFrame 3 (Actimetrics, USA) and Ethovision XT (Noldus, Netherlands) software, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Contextual Fear Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 1, rats were habituated to the context A for 10 min, which consisted of a standard conditioning chamber with a metal grid floor (Coulbourn Instruments). On day 2, animals were placed in the conditioning chamber in context A for 10 min and received three signaled footshocks (0.5 mA, 1 s) preceded by a tone stimulus (80 dB, 30 s). Animals in the no shock group were placed in the conditioning chamber in context A for 10 min, heard the tone but did not receive shocks. On day 3, animals were placed in context B and received five tones (80 dB, 30 s). Context B contained a black Plexiglas floor washed with peppermint soap, different wall materials (clear plastic or metal) and different light placement. Total time spent freezing to the tone was manually scored offline for each animal by an observer blind to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pavlovian Fear Conditioning and Extinction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 1, rats were placed individually into a standard conditioning chamber (Coulbourn Instruments, Holliston, MA, United States) within a sound- and light-attenuating box illuminated by one 25 W bulb. The experimental contingencies were controlled by a computer via FreezeFrame software from Coulbourn. Rats were placed in the chamber for 3 min (baseline) before presenting a 20-s, 80-dB, and 3-kHz tone, conditioned stimulus (CS). During the last 2 s of the tone, an unconditioned stimulus (US) consisting of a 0.5 mA foot shock was delivered through the grid floor. The pairing of CS and US was repeated seven times at intervals of 2 min to strengthen the association between the tone and the shock. Memory was assessed 24 h later in a novel context that differed in scent, color/texture of walls and floor, and illumination, by measuring the amount of time rats exhibited freezing in response to the tone. Following this initial determination, extinction was tested by recording freezing behavior during the presentation of 10 tones (separated by 200 s) without a foot shock every 24 h after conditioning for 5 consecutive days.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Contextual Fear Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 1, rats were habituated to the context for 10 min which consisted of a standard conditioning chamber with a metal grid floor (Coulbourn Instruments). On day 2, animals were placed in the conditioning chamber for 10 min and received three unsignaled footshocks (0.5 mA, 1 s). Animals in the “no shock” group were placed in conditioning chambers for 10 min on day 2 but did not receive shocks. On day 3, animals were returned to the conditioning chamber for 10 min. Total time spent freezing after the shock during conditioning (30 s) and to the context during testing (freezing time per minute over 10 min) was manually scored offline for each animal by an observer blind to group assignment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Contextual Fear Conditioning Paradigm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animals were habituated to the context for 10 min which consisted of a standard conditioning chamber with a metal grid floor (Coulbourn Instruments). Preexposure to the context on Day 1 and a 5 min placement in the context before the first shock on Day 2 were used to reduce any potential behavioral differences between sexes (Wiltgen et al., 2001 (link)). The next day (Day 2), animals were placed in the conditioning chamber for 10 min and received 3 unsignaled footshocks (0.5mA, 1 sec). The first footshock was delivered after 5 min in the conditioning chamber. The timing of second and third footshocks was random with at least 45 seconds between each shock. Animals in the “no-shock” group were also habituated to the chamber on Day 1. On Day 2, they were placed in conditioning chambers for 10 minutes but did not receive shocks. 24 hours later (Day 3), animals were returned to the conditioning chamber for 10 min. Total time spent freezing to the context was manually scored offline for each animal by an observer blind to group assignment. 45 minutes after the completion of behavioral testing, animals were given an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (100mg/kg) and perfused transcardially with 0.1M PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M PB. Animals designated as “home-cage controls” were never exposed to the conditioning chambers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Contextual Fear Conditioning in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 1, rats were habituated to the context for 10 min which consisted of a standard conditioning chamber with a metal grid floor (Coulbourn Instruments). On day 2, animals in the “shock” group were placed in the conditioning chamber for 8 min and received 3 footshocks (0.5mA, 1 sec). Animals in the “no-shock” group were placed in conditioning chambers for the same 8 minutes on day 2 but did not receive shocks. On day 3, shock and no-shock animals were returned to the conditioning chamber for 10 min. Total time spent freezing before the shock (baseline, 30 seconds), after the shock (30 seconds, post shock) during conditioning and to the context during testing (freezing time per minute over 10 minutes) was manually scored offline for each animal by an observer blind to group assignment. Preexposure to the context on Day 1 and a 5 min placement in the context before the first shock on Day 2 were used to reduce any potential behavioral differences between sexes (Wiltgen et al., 2001 (link)). A third group of animals received no behavioral manipulation and were naïve “home cage” controls (n=5 males, n=5 females).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!