The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Macerozyme

Manufactured by Duchefa Biochemie
Sourced in Japan

Macerozyme is a cell wall-degrading enzyme derived from Rhizopus sp. It is commonly used to facilitate the isolation and purification of plant protoplasts from plant tissues.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using macerozyme

1

Chemical Treatments and Cell Wall Digestion of SOK-YFP Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used to treat SOK-YFP roots are shown in Extended Table 1. Concentration for each chemical was obtained from literature. Seedlings were placed on MS plates containing each chemicals for the durations mentioned in the text and were subsequently imaged by confocal microscopy. As controls for the chemical treatments, the same percentage of DMSO or ethanol used for each chemical treatment were used and no effect was observed. For most of the chemical treatments, final concentrations of DMSO were <0.5% (v/v) and ethanol were <0.1% (v/v).
Plasmolysis was performed either on MS medium with mannitol (Sigma, M9546) at final concentration 0.4 M or by dipping roots in 0.4 M mannitol solution in milliQ water, and stained by FM4-64 at least for 2 min. For cell wall digestion, either 1% Cellulose R10 (Yakult Honsha Co. L.T.D, Japan) and/or 0.2% Macerozyme (Duchefa) were used. Cellulose and/or Macerozyme was dissolved in a solution containing 0.4 M mannitol, 10mM CaCl2, 20 mM KCl and 20 mM MES (pH 5.7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chemical Treatments and Cell Wall Digestion of SOK-YFP Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals used to treat SOK-YFP roots are shown in Extended Table 1. Concentration for each chemical was obtained from literature. Seedlings were placed on MS plates containing each chemicals for the durations mentioned in the text and were subsequently imaged by confocal microscopy. As controls for the chemical treatments, the same percentage of DMSO or ethanol used for each chemical treatment were used and no effect was observed. For most of the chemical treatments, final concentrations of DMSO were <0.5% (v/v) and ethanol were <0.1% (v/v).
Plasmolysis was performed either on MS medium with mannitol (Sigma, M9546) at final concentration 0.4 M or by dipping roots in 0.4 M mannitol solution in milliQ water, and stained by FM4-64 at least for 2 min. For cell wall digestion, either 1% Cellulose R10 (Yakult Honsha Co. L.T.D, Japan) and/or 0.2% Macerozyme (Duchefa) were used. Cellulose and/or Macerozyme was dissolved in a solution containing 0.4 M mannitol, 10mM CaCl2, 20 mM KCl and 20 mM MES (pH 5.7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Pea Leaf Mesophyll Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pisum sativum plants were grown in a climatized chamber at 25 °C with a light/dark photoperiod of 16:8 hours. Intra-veining strips were cut out of leaves from 2-week-old plants (1.5 g) and incubated for 210 min at 30 °C with gentle shaking (70 rpm) in 10 mL of 1 M mannitol, 100 mM MES-KOH, pH 5.6, 0.37% w/v macerozyme, and 1.5 % w/v cellulase (Duchefa Biochemie, Haarlem, The Netherlands). The digestion reaction was stopped by adding 2 mL of 2 mM MES, 154 mM NaCl, 125 mM CaCl2, 5 mM KCl, pH 5.7, and the cell suspension was filtered through a polypropylene mesh (pore diameter: 105 µm; tissue thickness: 121 µm—polyester Woven filter, Spectrum Labs, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA). Digested cells were washed twice by resuspending them in 2 mL of 4 mM MES, 0.4 M mannitol, and 15 mM MgCl2, pH 5.7. Finally, they were pelleted by gentle centrifugation (3 min at 100× g), resuspended in 1 mL of the same buffer, counted, and stored at 4 °C after having confirmed their integrity at the microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mesophyll Protoplast Isolation and Cell Wall Regeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mesophyll protoplasts of the fully expanded leaves from the 4th node close to the apical buds of control and three T0 mutants were isolated using Cellulase Onozuka RS (CAS. No. 9012‐54‐8, Duchefa Biochemie, Netherlands) and Macerozyme (CAS. No. 9032‐75‐1, Duchefa Biochemie, Netherlands) as described by Guo et al. (2012 (link)). Immediately, the protoplasts were cultured on callus induction medium (CIM) (NH4NO3‐free modified liquid MS medium supplemented with TDZ (0.01 mg/L), IBA (0.2 mg/L), BSA 1 g/L, glucose monophosphate 3.4%, CaCl2 0.67 g/L, Casein Hydrolysate 0.5 g/L and pH 5.6) at a cell density of 1–5 × 105 cells/mL for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. The cell wall regeneration rate in leaf mesophyll protoplasts from WT and three T0 mutants were analyzed using Field Emission Scanning Electron microscopy (FE‐SEM) (Method S9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!