The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

266 protocols using supelco 37 component fame mix

1

GC-FID Analysis of Fatty Acid Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The characterization of FAMEs was performed using Agilent 6890N (Network GC System, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) gas chromatography with FID detector (GC-FID). The separation was achieved on an Omegawax 320, 30 m × 0.32 mm, × 0.25 µm, on a capillary column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The temperature program was as follows: 50 °C (held 2 min) to 220 °C at 4 °C/min (held 20 min). The carrier gas was helium in constant flow mode (1 mL/min). The injector was set to 260 °C and the detector to 280 °C. The individual fatty acids were identified and quantified by comparing their retention times with those of a standard Supelco 37 component FAME Mix (Supelco) and expressed in weight percent of total fatty acids. Procedural blanks were analyzed with each set of samples. Standard Supelco 37 component FAME Mix was analyzed after every ten samples to verify the stability of the analytical system. Method precision based on measurements of replicate (n = 2) real samples was 5%. Results were expressed as the percentage of each fatty acid with respect to the total fatty acids [45 ]. This percentage was calculated using the peak area of the samples corrected with the respective correction factors, according to Christie and Han [46 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fatty Acid Profile Analysis of Steaks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid profile analysis was carried out in the steaks without simulated retail display. Lipid extraction was carried out following Bligh and Dyer [102 (link),103 (link)]. FA derivatization was obtained by saponification, methylation, and esterification [104 ]. FA were analysed by gas chromatography (Claurus 400 Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), with a polar column (100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20 μm; Sigma, Bellfonte, PA, USA). Peak identification was achieved by comparing the retention times of the unknowns with the standard SupelcoTM 37 Component FAME mix (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fatty Acid Profiling of Beef Burgers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fatty acid profile of raw beef burgers from days 1 and 6 was determined by gas chromatography. Fat from the test samples was extracted with a chloroform-methanol mixture as per the procedure by Folch et al. [12 (link)]. The resulting fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were analyzed using a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector (FID) equipped with a RT® 2560 silica column (100 m × 0.25 mm ID and 0.2 µm film thickness) (RESTEK, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Samples of 1 mL were analyzed in three repetitions. Compounds were identified by comparing the retention times obtained with those of fatty acid standards (SupelcoTM 37 Component FAME mix, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The results were averaged and expressed in grams per 100 g fat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GC Standards for Fatty Acid Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fatty acid methyl ester mix was used as GC standards (SupelcoTM 37 Component FAME Mix, Sigma-Aldrich). All solvents used for sample preparation were of analytical grade and the solvents used for GC analysis were of HPLC grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transesterification and GC-FID Analysis of Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted lipids were subjected to an acid-catalyzed transesterification process prior to analysis by gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID). Firstly, lipids were dissolved in 4 mL of n-hexane (99.0% Panreac AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany). For the transesterification step, 1 mL of the diluted sample, 100 μL of heptadecanoic acid (internal standard, 98.0% Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany), and 1 mL of the mixture 10% MeOH:H2SO4 (10:1 (v/v)) were added to glass capped test tubes with a screw cap and heated at 100 °C for 2 h. The organic phase was collected and after residual water removal with Na2SO4, fatty acid methyl esters were analyzed by GC-FID (CP-3800 Varian, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a Teknokroma® TR WAX 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm column. GC-FID operational conditions were as follows: carrier gas flow (He) 1 mL min−1; injector—250 °C; detector—280 °C; oven—40 °C with a ramp of 30 °C min−1 up to 150 °C followed by a ramp of 3 °C min−1 up to 250 °C. The volume of the injected sample was 1 µL and the split (1:10) injection technique was applied. For peak identification, a mixture containing saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated FAME ranging from C4:0 to C24:1 was used (SupelcoTM 37 Component FAME Mix, Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Results were expressed as percentages and as means of triplicates ± standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Procedures for Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals K-YBGL kit was from Megazyme International (Ireland). Sulfatase, diosmetin, caphtaric acid and coutaric acid were purchased from Fluka (Munich, Germany). Organic solvents used in this work were of HPLC grade, purchased from J.T. Baker (Deventer, Nederland). Other used chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Derivatization reagent for sterol determination was bis-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide and trimethylchlorosilane (99% BSTFA + 1% TMCS), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). The standard for fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) was Supelco TM 37 Component FAME Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fatty Acid Profiling of Nitrogen-Grown Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After an appropriate amount of time for consuming nitrogen, strain JSC4 cells were harvested from the culture medium by centrifugation (7,000 rpm for 2 min). The cells were washed twice with deionized water, lyophilized, and weighed. The lipid composition was determined as fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) following direct transesterification of lipids according to the method described in Ho et al. [7 (link)]. FAMEs were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) on a GCMS-QP2010 Plus instrument (Shimadzu). Samples were injected onto a DB-23 capillary column (60 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.15-μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 2.3 mL min−1. The injector, ion source, and interface source temperatures were set at 230°C, 230°C, and 250°C, respectively. The oven temperature was initially set at 50°C for 1 min, increased from 50°C to 175°C at a rate of 25°C/min, increased from 175°C to 230°C at a rate of 4°C/min, and held at 230°C for 5 min. Purified FAMEs were identified based on retention time and the pattern of fragmentation by electron impact analysis. Supelco 37 Component FAME Mix (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) was utilized as a quantitative standard, and pentadecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) was used as an internal standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GC-FID Analysis of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fatty acid methyl esters extracted were analyzed by a gas chromatography equipment with auto-sampler, a split/splitless injector, FID detector, and a hydrogen gas generator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Milan, Italy). The analysis was carried out on a BPX 70 capillary column (SGE Analytical Science, P/N SGE054623, 60 m × 0.25 mm ID—BPX70 0.25 µM, SGE Europe Ltd., Milton Keynes, UK). Hydrogen was used as carrier gas, 3.0 mL min−1, constant flow mode; the amount injected was 1 µL in splitless mode (split flow 50 mL min−1, splitless time 1 min). The temperature of the injector and the FID detector were 250 °C and 270 °C, respectively. The initial temperature of the oven was 40 °C, then it increased to 170 °C at 10 °C min−1 for 5 min, then to 200 °C at 4 °C min−1 for another 5 min, and finally the temperature increased to 255 °C at 50 °C min−1 and held for 4.5 min. The identification of each peak was obtained by comparing the retention times with those of a mixture of standards (Supelco 37-Component FAME Mix, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Data were expressed as percentage of each fatty acid calculated on the total amount of fatty acids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Free Fatty Acids in Aged Beef

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free fatty acid contents in dry- and wet-aged beef were assessed by the method of Lee et al. [3 (link)]. Briefly, 1 g of lipid was put into the test tube with 1 mL of chloroform and an internal standard (1 mg of triundecanoate/mL isooctane). After removing triglycerides from the samples, free fatty acids were extracted using 2% acetic acid in diethyl ether. The extract was evaporated with nitrogen gas and heated at 85 °C for 10 min. After that, 2 mL of 14% boron trifluoride–methanol was put into the test tube for methylation and heated at the same condition. Then, 2 mL of isooctane and 1 mL of saturated sodium chloride were added into the test tube and centrifuged at 1573× g for 3 min (Continent 512R, Hanil Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Korea). The upper layer containing fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) was dehydrated with anhydrous sodium sulfate. FAME was analyzed using gas chromatography (HP 7890, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DB-23 column (60 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm; length × diameter × thickness) (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Each FAME was identified by comparing the retention time of external standards (Supelco® 37 Component FAME mix, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fatty Acid Profiling of Freeze-Dried Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried and homogenized cell material (3 mg) was extracted and transesterfied as detailed in Mudimu et al. [40 ]. The extract was dissolved in DCM to a concentration of 0.5 mg ml-l and subjected to the analysis of FAMEs using an Agilent 7820A gas chromatograph equipped with a Phenomenex ZB-Wax column (30 m × 0.25 mm i.d.; 0.50 μm film thickness) and connected to a flame ionization detector (FID). Hydrogen was the carrier gas at 1 ml min-1. The oven temperature was programmed from 50°C (1 min) to 200°C at 25°C min-1, then to 230°C (held 18 min) at 3°C min-1. FAMEs were assigned by comparison of retention times with those of the “Supelco 37 Component FAME mix” (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany).
FAMEs not included in the standard mixture were assigned from their mass spectral characteristics using an Agilent 7820A gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5975 MSD mass spectrometer. Analytical conditions were as above. Assignment of FAMEs was accomplished by comparison of mass spectra with those in the “Lipid Library” of the American Oil Chemists’ Society (http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!